1-20 of 124 results for subject:"Debit cards"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.285 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.003 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Debit cards"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Debit cards" OR subject_ses:90830
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of whether allowing the use of debit cards and digital payment wallets in land-based gambling venues will prevent (1) their closure, (2) a decline in revenue, or (3) job losses.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of whether allowing the use of debit cards and digital payment wallets in land-based gambling venues will prevent (1) their closure, (2) a decline in revenue, or (3) job losses.
The use of debit cards and digital payment wallets is currently permitted for a range of gambling and non-gambling activities in land-based gambling venues in Great Britain. The Gaming Machines (Circumstances of Use) Regulations 2007 prohibit the direct use of debit cards on gaming machines. The full regulations can be seen here: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2007/2319/contents/made
In our manifesto, we set out our intention to reduce gambling-related harm, strengthen protections for those at risk, and work with the industry to ensure responsible gambling. We are in the early stages of the new Government and are still considering the full range of gambling policy. We will consider the best available evidence from a wide range of sources to inform decisions on how best to fulfil our manifesto commitments.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the number of adults in England and Wales who cannot acquire or deposit cash due to a lack of access to debit cards or the internet.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the number of adults in England and Wales who cannot acquire or deposit cash due to a lack of access to debit cards or the internet.
To ensure access to cash is protected, the government is currently taking legislation through Parliament as part of the Financial Services and Markets Bill. Following a public consultation, the Bill will establish the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) as the lead regulator for access to cash and provide it with appropriate powers to seek to ensure reasonable provision of withdrawal and deposit facilities. In exercising its powers, the FCA must have regard to any local deficiencies in the provision of cash access that it has identified and considers to be significant. The government’s view is that this will allow for consideration of local circumstances in all parts of the UK, and will help ensure the most vulnerable are protected. Further details about the Bill can be found on the Parliament website.
This Bill builds on the government’s longstanding commitment to safeguard financial inclusion across the UK, including via the provision of basic bank accounts. Existing legislation requires the nine largest personal current account providers in the UK to provide basic bank accounts, so customers are equipped with a bank card and can access banking and payment services.
The FCA has a considerable evidence base on cash provision and use across the UK. Analysis that was published by the FCA in February 2020 found that 5.4 million people are still reliant on cash. Meanwhile, the FCA’s analysis shows that, as of the end of 2021, over 95% of the population are within two kilometres of a free-to-use cash access point, such as a free-to-use ATM, bank branch or Post Office branch.
Finally, Treasury Ministers and officials have meetings with a wide variety of organisations in the public and private sectors as part of the process of policy development and delivery. Details of ministerial and permanent secretary meetings with external organisations on departmental business are published on a quarterly basis and are available on the gov.uk website.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Answer of 23 November 2021 to Question 77446 on Debit Cards, what rights consumers have to be informed of the amount of recurring payments being (a) debited and (b) changed.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Answer of 23 November 2021 to Question 77446 on Debit Cards, what rights consumers have to be informed of the amount of recurring payments being (a) debited and (b) changed.
Where a customer grants standing authority to a merchant, both parties agree to the terms under which recurring payments can be taken from the customer’s account. The FCA encourages merchants to ensure that the continuous payment authority agreement sets out clearly the amount that will be taken in each transaction, and encourages merchants to give the range within which the amount may vary. Under the Payment Services Regulations 2017, if the amount of a payment transaction exceeds the amount the customer could reasonably have expected in the circumstances, the customer is entitled to a refund of the full amount of the transaction from their Payment Service Provider.
As for recurring Direct Debit payments, the Direct Debit Guarantee provides for advance notice to be given to customers for any changes to the amount, date, or frequency of a Direct Debit as instructed by the customer. Notice periods can be agreed between individual customers and merchants. The Direct Debit Guarantee is not a statutory protection, but part of the Bacs Direct Debit scheme rules, operated by Pay.UK.
More broadly, the Government is committed to tackling so-called subscriptions traps and other business practices that harm consumers. In response to growing concerns on this matter, the Government published a consultation which closed on 1 October 2021. It sets out our commitment to tackling problems encountered by consumers when taking out a subscription contract, including making it easier for a consumer to cancel an unwanted subscription. For further information the proposals can be found at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/reforming-competition-and-consumer-policy
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what regulatory protections are in place for consumers who have automated payments taken from payment debit cards; and for what reason those payments do not fall under the jurisdiction of the Direct Debit Guarantee.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what regulatory protections are in place for consumers who have automated payments taken from payment debit cards; and for what reason those payments do not fall under the jurisdiction of the Direct Debit Guarantee.
A continuous payment authority (sometimes called a “recurring” or “automated” payment) is a regular payment, where a payer has given consent for a firm to take one or more payments from a customer’s payment account. These are often established to enable regular payments to be made for goods or services via a payment card – for example, for a magazine subscription – and are distinct from Direct Debits. A retailer or supplier is not permitted to take a recurring payment without authorisation from the cardholder.
The Payment Services Regulations 2017 provide for unauthorised transactions to be refunded immediately. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has published advice to consumers about continuous payment authorities and their rights to cancel them. In its published guidance on the regulations, the FCA states that consumers have the right to cancel recurring payments at any time before the end of the business day before a payment is due to be made, and to obtain an immediate refund from their payment service provider if any future payments are debited from their account after they have revoked their consent.
Different payment schemes may offer additional protections to customers. The Direct Debit Guarantee is an additional safeguard for customers who initiate Direct Debits, and applies to all banks and building societies taking part in the Bacs Direct Debit scheme, operated by Pay.UK.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, with reference to letters received by Santander customers advising that their debit cards will not be renewed due to not being used at a cash machine or physical point of sale, if he will will make representations to high street banks on the...
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, with reference to letters received by Santander customers advising that their debit cards will not be renewed due to not being used at a cash machine or physical point of sale, if he will will make representations to high street banks on the...
Sometimes banks will require customers to complete a certain transaction to activate a new card. If customers are unable to do this (e.g. if they are vulnerable or shielding) then they are encouraged to speak to their provider who can help find an alternative solution.
To ask the Senior Deputy Speaker whether catering and retail staff members of the House of Lords receive the full amount of any "tip" given to them when paid by debit card.
To ask the Senior Deputy Speaker whether catering and retail staff members of the House of Lords receive the full amount of any "tip" given to them when paid by debit card.
The Senior Deputy Speaker has asked me, as Chair of the Services Committee, to respond on his behalf. The full amount of any tip paid by debit card, or any other form of payment, is distributed amongst Catering and Retail staff, less a deduction for Employer’s National Insurance at the appropriate rate.
Gratuity payments are made to staff via the payroll, therefore a deduction for tax and Employee’s National Insurance is made at the relevant rate.
Any administration charges linked to payments via credit or debit cards are not deducted from the gratuity amount.
To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to review debit card charges for retailers such as vehicle retailers which deal in high value transactions.
To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to review debit card charges for retailers such as vehicle retailers which deal in high value transactions.
The Government set up the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to protect consumers from the harm that can be caused by bad conduct in the financial services industry. In 2015, it also set up the world’s only Payment Systems Regulator (PSR) with a statutory objective to ensure that payment systems are operated in a way that takes account of users’ needs.
The FCA is the UK’s competent authority for the Payment Services Regulations (PSRs) 2017. The PSRs aim to make payments safer and more secure and protect consumers. As set out in these regulations, if a payment transaction (be that a bank transfer or debit card payment) is not properly authorised by the customer, the customer’s bank or payment service provider must refund the amount of the transaction to the payer. For authorised payment scams, where the customer has authorised a bank transfer but the money has been paid to a fraudulent recipient, the PSR has brought together consumer representatives and banks to produce an industry code of conduct to address this issue. Launched in May 2019, the code sets out agreed principles for greater protection of consumers and the circumstances in which they will be reimbursed, marking a significant step in delivering improved protections for customers.
Regarding debit card charges, the UK implemented the EU’s Interchange Fee Regulation in 2015 which introduced a cap on one of the key fees applicable to card payments. The European Commission is in the process of reviewing the effectiveness of this regulation as part of its usual process. The PSR, who is the UK’s lead competent authority for the Interchange Fee Regulation, is also conducting a review into the supply of card-acquiring services. Amongst other things, this review will examine the fees merchants pay for these services.
The Government is open to hearing views on this issue, and digital payments more broadly, as evidenced by its Call for Evidence on Cash and Digital Payments in the New Economy.
I beg to move.
I beg to move.
My Lords, I wish to press the Minister further on these regulations, not in respect of the impact assessment, which in relation to these regulations was de minimis, but in respect of the fundamental issue of the interchange fees that will be charged as a result of these regulations to...
My Lords, I wish to press the Minister further on these regulations, not in respect of the impact assessment, which in relation to these regulations was de minimis, but in respect of the fundamental issue of the interchange fees that will be charged as a result of these regulations to...
I am grateful to the noble Lord for raising that point. It was a point of debate on a technical matter relating to whether you treat a country as a third country, which we believe we have no option but to do since we will no longer be in the...
I am grateful to the noble Lord for raising that point. It was a point of debate on a technical matter relating to whether you treat a country as a third country, which we believe we have no option but to do since we will no longer be in the...
My Lords, I am sorry to intervene again, but that response could not be more unsatisfactory. Noble Lords seeking to engage in the debate this afternoon on this fundamental issue are supposed to rely on a letter sent to two noble Lords this morning and placed in the Library of...
My Lords, I am sorry to intervene again, but that response could not be more unsatisfactory. Noble Lords seeking to engage in the debate this afternoon on this fundamental issue are supposed to rely on a letter sent to two noble Lords this morning and placed in the Library of...
My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Adonis, makes a very serious point. We have only just achieved the abolition of these charges on credit cards, for which the Government tried to claim credit when in fact it was an EU regulation that achieved it. We are effectively being told that,...
My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Adonis, makes a very serious point. We have only just achieved the abolition of these charges on credit cards, for which the Government tried to claim credit when in fact it was an EU regulation that achieved it. We are effectively being told that,...
Lords motion to approve. Agreed to on question.
Lords motion to approve. Agreed to on question.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment he has made of changes in the level of costs to (a) car auctions and (b) other industries for debit card transaction charges as a result of the Interchange Fee Regulation.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment he has made of changes in the level of costs to (a) car auctions and (b) other industries for debit card transaction charges as a result of the Interchange Fee Regulation.
The European Commission plans to review the effectiveness of the Interchange Fee Regulation in the coming years as part of its usual process. Government has therefore not made a formal assessment of the impact of the Interchange Fee Regulation.
The Government is open to hearing views on this issue, and digital payments more broadly, as evidenced by its recently closed call for evidence on cash and digital payments in the new economy. This sought information on how the shift from cash to digital payments impacts on different sectors, different regions and different demographics. The Government will formally respond to the call for evidence in due course.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether his Department has a role in tackling credit and debit card fraud; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether his Department has a role in tackling credit and debit card fraud; and if he will make a statement.
The Home Office has overall responsibility for economic crime including credit and debit card fraud. The Ministry of Justice supports this work and has responsibility for the criminal court system and criminal law reform.
Clauses 126 to 131, 137 to 143, 155 to 179 agreed to. Schedules 17 and 23 to 25 agreed to. Government new clause 7 (Receipts from intellectual property: diverted profits tax), agreed to. Government new clause 8 (Deduction of income tax at source: intellectual property), agreed to. Government new clause 9 (Receipts from intellectual property: territorial scope), agreed to. Government new clause 10 (Stamp duty: acquisition of target company's share capital), agreed to. Government new clause 11 (Corporation tax: territorial scope etc), discussed with Government new clauses 12 to 17, agreed to. Government new clause 12 (Corporation tax: transactions in UK land), agreed to. Government new clause 13 (Income tax: territorial scope etc), agreed to. Government new clause 14 (Income tax: transactions in UK land), agreed to. Government new clause 15 (Pre-trading expenses), agreed to. Government new clause 16 (Commencement and transitional provision: sections (Corporation tax: territorial scope etc), (Corporation tax: transactions in UK land) and (Pre-trading expenses)), agreed to. Government new clause 17 (Commencement and transitional provision: sections (Income tax: transactions in UK land) and (Income tax: territorial scope etc)), agreed to. New clause 1 (VAT treatment of the Scottish Police Authority and the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service), debated and withdrawn. New clause 2 (Review of the apprenticeship levy) withdrawn (debated during the committee's fourth sitting 5 July). New clause 3 (Corporation tax treatment of the oil and gas industry) withdrawn (debated during the committee's third sitting 5 July). New clause 4 (Fuel duty regulator regime), negatived on division (5 votes to 11). New clause 5 debated and withdrawn. New clause 6 (Oil and gas: decommissioning contracts), negatived on division (5 votes to 11). Written evidence reported to the House. Bill, as amended, to be reported (Bill 47).
Clauses 126 to 131, 137 to 143, 155 to 179 agreed to. Schedules 17 and 23 to 25 agreed to. Government new clause 7 (Receipts from intellectual property: diverted profits tax), agreed to. Government new clause 8 (Deduction of income tax at source: intellectual property), agreed to. Government new clause...
To ask the Chairman of Committees what proportion of gratuities paid by credit or debit card is distributed to staff in the House of Lords.
To ask the Chairman of Committees what proportion of gratuities paid by credit or debit card is distributed to staff in the House of Lords.
All Catering and Retail Services staff, with the exception of staff grade A and above, receive a share of gratuities and function service charges, including those paid on debit and credit cards. The formula for working out the share for each permanent member of staff is based on contracted hours and attendance. Gratuities are distributed three times a year through payroll after a 13.8% deduction for employer National Insurance, and individually-calculated deductions for employee National Insurance and income tax.
A proportion of gratuities and function service charges is paid to zero hour staff (none of whom has a contractual exclusivity clause) split on a pro-rata basis according to the number of hours they have worked. Since the review referred to in my predecessor’s answer of 26 March 2015 (HL5819), the House of Lords makes no deduction for card commission.
Clauses 219 to 232 agreed to, with clause 219, discussed with new clause 6 (Transfer pricing arrangements), agreed to as amended. Schedules 46 to 49 agreed to. New clause 4 (Contribution allowances: Plant and machinery), debated and agreed to. New clause 1 (Abolition of retrospective application of section 58(4) of the Finance Act 2008), debated and withdrawn. New clause 2 (Stamp duty and stamp duty reserve tax: Unit trusts), debated and negatived on division (9 votes to 15). New clause 3 (Employee shareholders), and new clause 5 (Rate of bingo duty) not called. Bill, as amended, to be reported (Bill 18).
Clauses 219 to 232 agreed to, with clause 219, discussed with new clause 6 (Transfer pricing arrangements), agreed to as amended. Schedules 46 to 49 agreed to. New clause 4 (Contribution allowances: Plant and machinery), debated and agreed to. New clause 1 (Abolition of retrospective application of section 58(4) of...
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what estimate they have made of the costs and benefits for (1) consumers, and (2) small businesses, of holding and using credit and debit cards as a result of the Europian Commission's green paper Towards an integrated European market for card, internet and mobile payments...
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what estimate they have made of the costs and benefits for (1) consumers, and (2) small businesses, of holding and using credit and debit cards as a result of the Europian Commission's green paper Towards an integrated European market for card, internet and mobile payments...
The European Commission is expected to publish its response to the Green Paper consultation Towards an Integrated European market for card, internet and mobile payments later this summer, together with a legislative proposal to regulate multilteral interchange fees on card payments. The proposals will be accompanied by an impact assessment.
The Government will make its own assessment of the legislative proposal once the proposal is published.