Skip to main content

1-20 of 976 results for subject:"Department for Science, Innovation and Technology"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, what steps the Department is taking to ensure that small businesses in each area can access practical support to adopt artificial intelligence safely and productively.

Asked by
Gordon McKee (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 August 2026
Reference
18842
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government how many (1) desks, and (2) civil servants, are assigned to the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology office at 22–26 Whitehall.

Asked by
Lord Houchen of High Leven (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 July 2026
Reference
HL2070
House
House of Lords

Lords private notice question on what assessment they have made of the abolition of the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology and the merging of its functions with other departments and; the implications of this on the future operation of (1) the AI Safety Institute, (2) the Sovereign AI Fund,...

Lead member
Lord Clement-Jones
Answering member
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Private notice questions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 cc1022-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, science and AI are having an increasingly large impact on all areas of government policy and economic growth. We should not see science and technology as an isolated issue. That is why the Prime Minister has announced a bold restructuring, including the elevation of AI to the Office...

Member
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1022
House
House of Lords

My Lords, many of us welcomed the creation of DSIT and the focus that it brought on science and technology, but with the very regrettable resignation of the noble Lord, Lord Vallance, who will be greatly missed, and the understandable concerns expressed by Sir Paul Nurse, the president of the...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1022
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord raises a series of very important issues. First, I put on record my absolute thanks for the work done by my noble friend Lord Vallance, who it has been a pleasure and privilege to work with. Noble Lords will appreciate—there have been many comments in your Lordships’...

Member
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1022
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the Minister agree that there is a real danger here of exactly the wrong signal being sent to the science community? First, there is the departure of one of the most successful Science Ministers of recent years—I say that as one of his predecessors from long ago—the...

Member
Lord Waldegrave of North Hill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1022
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord makes an interesting point, but it is also incredibly important that we talk about AI, and more broadly its impact on science and what is changing, as something that should be at the heart of government and central to every department. There has not been a subject...

Member
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1024
House
House of Lords

My Lords, any reorganisation like this will take of the order of 12 months, which is an eternity in AI. It is equivalent to three generations of frontier AI models. Can the Minister reassure the House that both the AI Security Institute and the sovereign AI fund will be able...

Member
Lord Tarassenko (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1024
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord raises a very important point. We are seeing technology move faster than at any point over the last 100 years, never mind in my lifetime. It is incredibly important that we keep up, which is why we will now have a dedicated Minister attending Cabinet to make...

Member
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1024
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if the House will allow me, I pay my own tribute to my noble friend Lord Vallance of Balham, whose record of public service, both as Government Chief Scientific Adviser and as Minister for Science, has been exemplary. As the noble Lord said, he will be missed. Does...

Member
Viscount Stansgate (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1024
House
House of Lords

My noble friend is absolutely right. The new Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade will focus on new and emerging sectors as part of our reindustrialisation agenda. This is about building on the foundations that we have already made so that we can move further and faster to deliver...

Member
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1025
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there is much scratching of heads about the detachment of science and technology. We hear about an AI Minister who will now be in a new office at the Cabinet Office and, some are also saying, at DCMS reporting into it, but we were talking about movement in...

Member
Lord Ranger of Northwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1025
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord raises a genuinely valid point, but this is about how we mainstream everything and put this at the heart. Everything we are talking about is AI-enhanced reindustrialisation. I appreciate that there are many times when we use “AI” as shorthand for tech or science, just because of...

Member
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1025
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there are five areas where a country or a company can lead in artificial intelligence: people, chips, models, infrastructure and deployment. The leading global companies are spending about £500 billion this year on it; our spending as a country will be roughly 0.3% of that. Given the scale...

Member
Lord Dixon of Jericho (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1025
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is right that we are talking about how technology and the advancements in it are going to fuel economic growth. That is a priority for the Government, as the Prime Minister has made clear. The prioritisation of that will come in the coming days, but our key...

Member
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1025
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Krebs (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1025
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Vaizey of Didcot (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1025
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1026
House
House of Lords

I am grateful. My Lords, for those of us in the scientific community there is concern about the erosion of funding for basic discovery science, which, of course, is the bedrock of all future applications of science. Can the Minister provide reassurance that, in this reorganisation, UKRI will not reduce...

Member
Lord Krebs (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
858 c1026
House
House of Lords