Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,332 results for subject:"Development plans"

Type

-
Early day motions (11)
+ Legislation (19) + Acts (3)
-
Public acts (3)
+ Bills (2) + Public bills (2)
-
Consolidation bills (1)
-
Government bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (14)
-
Statutory instruments (14)
+ Members' contributions (610)
-
Business questions (5)
-
Maiden speeches (2)
-
Oral answers to questions (34)
+ Oral questions (34)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Proceeding contributions (542)
+ Parliamentary committees (29) + Committee proceedings (24)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (1)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (9)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (9)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (3)
-
Select Committee reports (3)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (2)
+ Parliamentary papers (169)
-
Command papers (2)
-
Consultation papers (45)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (1)
-
Deposited papers (149)
-
House of Commons papers (8)
-
Impact assessments (12)
-
Unprinted papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (98) + Debates (58)
-
Adjournment debates (22)
+ Committee proceedings (24)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (1)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (9)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (9)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (3)
+ Legislative debates (30)
-
Debates on bills (29)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (1)
-
Questions for short debate (2)
+ Petitions and observations (4)
-
Observations on petitions (2)
-
Paper petitions (2)
-
Private notice questions (1)
+ Statements (34) + Oral statements (2)
-
Ministerial statements (2)
-
Written statements (32)
+ Parliamentary questions (460)
-
Business questions (5)
+ Oral questions (34)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Private notice questions (1)
-
Written questions (420)
+ Petitions and observations (4)
-
Observations on petitions (2)
-
Paper petitions (2)
+ Research briefings (8) + Commons Briefing papers (7)
-
Constituency casework (1)
-
Data dashboards (1)
-
Commons Debate packs (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

This article gives information on the planning system in England, including how applications are decided and whether planning permission can be overturned.

Type
Constituency casework
Date
23 September 2026
Reference
CBP-10752

Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Allison Gardner
Answering member
Matthew Pennycook
Department
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
790 cc550-6
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for the opportunity to lead this debate on the role of masterplans in large-scale development. This debate will be of particular importance to many of my constituents in Lightwood and surrounding areas, where some 3,000 homes have been allocated through Stoke-on-Trent’s emerging local plan under site BL1.

I...

Member
Allison Gardner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
790 cc550-2
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Stoke-on-Trent South (Dr Gardner) on securing this important debate. I commend her for the compelling argument she makes about the importance of planning effectively for large-scale residential developments to ensure that they are well-connected, well-designed, sustainable and attractive places where people want...

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
790 cc552-6
House
House of Commons

The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) was first published in March 2012 and sets out the government's planning policies for England. This briefing focuses on the government's proposals for significant changes to the NPPF which were consulted on between December 2025 and March 2026.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
CBP-10964

This interactive dashboard provides statistics on land designated as green belt for parliamentary constituencies in England.

Type
Data dashboards
Date
13 June 2026
Reference
CBP-10898

Motion that this House has considered the impact of planning developments on local transport. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Victoria Collins
Answering member
Simon Lightwood; Jerome Mayhew
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Debates
Date
24 February 2026
Reference
781 cc81-108WH
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered the impact of planning developments on local transport.

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Sir Desmond. Let me start by making something clear: the local people of Harpenden, Berkhamsted, Tring, Redbourn, Sandridge and the surrounding villages are no nimbys. They...

Member
Victoria Collins (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2026
Reference
781 cc81-3WH
House
House of Commons

I commend the hon. Lady for bringing this topic to the House. We have similar problems back home in Northern Ireland. From listening to her, it seems that whenever a new development goes up, it relies on private cars, because there is no public transport out in the countryside, so...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2026
Reference
781 c83WH
House
House of Commons

I agree with parts of the hon. Member’s intervention. The developers have armies of legal teams and, as I will come on to, the national legislation is open to interpretation when it comes to roads. Councils are essentially left powerless to enforce the legislation, because developers find the loopholes. They...

Member
Victoria Collins (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2026
Reference
781 c83WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is right to point out that developers have armies of lawyers, and one of the most frustrating things for local authorities is when they come back again and again. Even when planning authorities reject an application, developers will take it to appeal, and even if the appeal...

Member
Freddie van Mierlo (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2026
Reference
781 c83WH
House
House of Commons

Absolutely. On top of that, councils also warn that when they get section 106 money or funding from the community infrastructure levy, the funding available is not enough for the new roads needed for development. They also warn that if we expect section 106 contributions to deliver all new infrastructure,...

Member
Victoria Collins (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2026
Reference
781 cc84-5WH
House
House of Commons

Like in my hon. Friend’s constituency, there are all kinds of speculative developments in Surrey Heath, but one of the greatest challenges we face is the potential relocation of Frimley Park hospital. When I asked about the budget that had been set aside for the creation of new roads, railway...

Member
Al Pinkerton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2026
Reference
781 c85WH
House
House of Commons

Quite frankly, I find it shameful. It is no wonder that communities are pushing back on development if they see that the infrastructure is not there, and if they cannot get around and cannot get a GP appointment, yet they see thousands of new homes being built. No wonder public...

Member
Victoria Collins (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2026
Reference
781 cc85-6WH
House
House of Commons

The latest NPPF makes it clear that transport planning and infrastructure should be designed in at the outset, but my rural constituency has seen continuous large-scale development outside towns, from which it takes 25 minutes to walk into a town centre. There are no buses. It is not like London...

Member
Sarah Gibson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2026
Reference
781 c86WH
House
House of Commons

Absolutely; I agree completely.

I come back to the promise that I would like to make to Hannah but cannot. Given that the average house price in Berkhamsted is over £650,000, and in Harpenden is more than £900,000, and given that last year the median new build price across the constituency...

Member
Victoria Collins (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2026
Reference
781 c86WH
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2026
Reference
781 c86WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Sir Desmond. I thank the hon. Member for Harpenden and Berkhamsted (Victoria Collins) for giving me the opportunity to talk about one of my favourite topics—public transport, or the lack thereof.

As other rural MPs in the room will know, improving local...

Member
Amanda Hack (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2026
Reference
781 cc86-8WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Sir Desmond. I am extremely grateful to the hon. Member for Harpenden and Berkhamsted (Victoria Collins) for securing this really important debate.

In my experience, nothing erodes public confidence in the planning system faster than development that is delivered with the promise...

Member
Rebecca Paul (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2026
Reference
781 cc88-9WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Sir Desmond. I, too, thank the hon. Member for Harpenden and Berkhamsted (Victoria Collins) for securing today’s debate, which brings together so many of us who have a shared passion for aligning local transport with development.

I can understand why so many...

Member
Julia Buckley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2026
Reference
781 cc89-90WH
House
House of Commons