Skip to main content

1-20 of 583 results for subject:"Digital Markets Unit"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what steps his Department is taking to ensure that the Digital Markets Unit can make effective market interventions.

Asked by
Jo Platt (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 January 2025
Reference
22068
House
House of Commons

My Lords, I added my name to Amendment 49, which was opened in detail by the noble and learned Lord, Lord Etherton. Therefore, and also because we are on Report, I can be extremely brief. I declare my interest as a barrister. I practise, among other places, in the Competition...

Member
Lord Wolfson of Tredegar (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2024
Reference
836 cc1827-8
House
House of Lords

Yes, we very much understand the spirit and intent of the amendment, so I would be very happy to consider that if we could expand it to cover the bases, as my noble friend sets out.

Amendment 55, also from my noble friend, would remove the role of the Secretary of...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2024
Reference
836 cc1833-4
House
House of Lords

Does the Minister accept what I said? In the Bill, currently there is no provision under the regulatory regime for the regulator to award damages for losses suffered by individual consumers.

Member
Lord Etherton (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2024
Reference
836 c1834
House
House of Lords

Yes, I believe that is the case and I accept that. But, as I said, I will commit to carrying out a review in the future to understand how best to implement a collective action basis.

Under the digital markets regime, the CMA will be—

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2024
Reference
836 c1834
House
House of Lords

I intend for it to be part of the post-implementation review of the Bill.

Under the digital markets regime, the CMA will be devising novel requirements designed to address the particular circumstances of individual firms and market conditions. The DMU will need time to establish a broad set of precedents on...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2024
Reference
836 c1835
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Viscount Camrose

2: Clause 11, page 6, line 34, leave out “a statement summarising the contents of”

Member's explanatory statement

This amendment would require the CMA to publish an SMS investigation notice rather than a summary of the notice.

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2024
Reference
836 c1835
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as the Minister described, this group has government amendments, from Amendment 2 to Amendment 38, which add greater transparency to the process adopted by the CMA in disclosing information about cases involving SMS status firms where the challenger companies have an interest. We are pleased with the Minister’s...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2024
Reference
836 c1836
House
House of Lords

I thank both noble Lords for speaking so eloquently—indeed, so briefly and elegantly—and the noble Baroness, Lady Jones, for tabling her amendments, which would require the DMU to establish a process for non-SMS firms to register themselves with the DMU as an interested party. The DMU would then be required...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2024
Reference
836 cc1836-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I refer to my entry in the register of interests. I will speak to my Amendment 34, the effect of which would be to allow the final offer mechanism to be initiated by the CMA after a conduct requirement of the type allowed under Clause 20(2)(a)—to

“trade on fair...

Member
Lord Black of Brentwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2024
Reference
836 cc1843-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it has been illuminating to listen to the varied and valuable contributions from all noble Lords who have spoken in this debate. I thank all those who have risen to speak. As may be expected,

a broad range of knowledge, differing views and important concerns has been shared...

Member
Lord Leong (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2024
Reference
836 cc1846-9
House
House of Lords

As ever, I start by thanking all noble Lords who have spoken so well and clearly in this very interesting debate. I will start with Amendment 12 from the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, and Amendments 14 and 15 from the noble Baroness, Lady Jones of Whitchurch, which would expand the...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2024
Reference
836 cc1849-1851
House
House of Lords

I am very grateful to my noble friend. Could he say therefore whether a designated undertaking that feels it can demonstrate countervailing benefits must have presented those to the CMA before the CMA concludes its findings under Clause 30—or can it do so afterwards?

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2024
Reference
836 c1850
House
House of Lords

It can make a representation to the effect of countervailing benefits as part of a breach investigation, which can of course happen at any time during the life of a conduct requirement. We would expect it to make those representations at the start of or during the initial investigation. When...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2024
Reference
836 c1850
House
House of Lords

Sorry, may I just press my noble friend? Can he therefore say that the presentation of a countervailing benefits exemption after the CMA has made findings under Clause 30 would be void?

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2024
Reference
836 c1852
House
House of Lords

A representation to the effect that there are countervailing benefits would take place as part of a breach investigation. Of course, once the investigation is complete, there is no further opportunity to do so. Have I answered the question?

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2024
Reference
836 c1852
House
House of Lords

Yes.

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2024
Reference
836 c1852
House
House of Lords

To address the concerns of the noble Lord, Lord Leong, that the current wording deviates from legal precedent, I note that, since this is a new regime, existing exemptions in different competition regimes would not be directly applicable. It is highly likely that the application of the exemption will be...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2024
Reference
836 c1852
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his response to the various amendments. I will be extremely brief; there will probably be quite a few votes now. I thank him for a full reassurance on Amendment 60, tabled by my noble friend, on standards

and interoperability. I was looking closely...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2024
Reference
836 cc1852-3
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Faulks

13: Clause 19, page 11, line 7, leave out “proportionate” and insert “appropriate”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment would restore the Bill’s original wording in relation to Clause 19.

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2024
Reference
836 c1853
House
House of Lords