Skip to main content

1-20 of 443 results for subject:"Division of time"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The negative procedure for statutory instruments should be used for uncontroversial matters. I am very grateful that the Government have accepted that when they are prayed against they will be debated.

Returning to normal, we are obviously going to have a lot of Bills in relation to the EU in the...

Member
Peter Bone (Conservative)
Type
Business questions
Date
23 March 2017
Reference
623 c959
House
House of Commons

I cannot promise my hon. Friend a statement next week. How we allocate time, given the exceptional pressure that there will be on legislative time because of the legislation that is needed to exit the European Union, is something that I and other business managers are taking very seriously indeed....

Member
David Lidington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2017
Reference
623 c959
House
House of Commons

If he will make more time available in Public Bill Committees and on the floor of the House for consideration of Private Members' Bills.

Asked by
Hugh Bayley (Labour)
Answering body
Leader of the House of Commons
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
22 January 2015
Reference
907156; 591 c365
House
House of Commons

No; in July 2012 the House voted against a proposal to consider private Members’ Bills on Tuesday evenings, following a report from the Procedure Committee. In its subsequent report on private Members’ Bills, that Committee assessed the timing for consideration of those Bills but did not recommend a significant increase in the total amount of time available.

Answered by
Lord Hague of Richmond (Conservative)
Answering body
Leader of the House of Commons
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
22 January 2015
Reference
591 c365
House
House of Commons

In 23 years as a Member of the House I have never been fortunate enough to have my name come up in the ballot for a private Member’s Bill, and I do not think that as a legislator I should have to wait a generation for an active chance to legislate in this House on behalf of my constituents. Will the Leader of the House set up a working party, which includes my hon. Friend the Member for Wallasey (Ms Eagle) and the Chair of the Backbench Business Committee, to consider better ways of giving Back Benchers the opportunity to legislate?

Asked by
Hugh Bayley (Labour)
Answering body
Leader of the House of Commons
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
22 January 2015
Reference
591 c365
House
House of Commons

I am sorry that the hon. Gentleman has not had that chance in 23 years. I am sure that whatever he introduced would have been brilliant, and the nation has been deprived of that legislation. However, many hon. Members across the House are fortunate enough to be able to do that—22 private Members’ Bill have attained Royal Assent so far in this Parliament, and I am sure there will be others during this Session. These questions are for the Procedure Committee and, as I said, it has reported on private Members’ Bills but did not recommend a significant increase in the time available.

Answered by
Lord Hague of Richmond (Conservative)
Answering body
Leader of the House of Commons
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
22 January 2015
Reference
591 c365
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Procedure Committee
Date
27 November 2013
Reference
HC 767 2013-14
House
House of Commons

Our practice on programming is to be flexible. It is sometimes in the interests of the House for time to be protected, but sometimes that would be an unnecessary constraint. As I made clear last week, in the run-up to the recess, there will inevitably be pressing reasons why the...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 July 2013
Reference
566 c547
House
House of Commons

Will the Leader of the House adopt a policy on programming whereby he gives a protected number of hours to main debates? As you were saying, Mr Speaker, today we have the problem that Back-Bench business is being squeezed, but if we had agreed a motion providing that it could...

Member
Peter Bone (Conservative)
Type
Business questions
Date
11 July 2013
Reference
566 c547
House
House of Commons

I am sorry that the hon. Gentleman feels that way. The intention of the Government, and I think of the major parties in this House, has been to ensure that there is access for smaller parties. In particular, arrangements have been made for smaller parties to attend the Backbench Business...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2013
Reference
564 c1064
House
House of Commons

The Leader of the House will know that a review of the Wright reforms is currently going through parliamentary Committees. The reforms have been an utter disaster for the smaller parties, leaving the proceedings of the House almost exclusively in the hands of the Government and the Labour Opposition. Will...

Member
Pete Wishart (Scottish National Party)
Type
Business questions
Date
20 June 2013
Reference
564 c1064
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Procedure Committee (HL)
Date
18 March 2013
Reference
HL 151 2012-13
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Procedure Committee
Date
30 January 2013
House
House of Commons

We have received confirmation of the Procedure Committee’s decision to undertake an inquiry into programming together with a request to set out the Government’s views. We will submit our views shortly.

Answered by
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Leader of the House of Commons
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 January 2013
Reference
556 c1021
House
House of Commons

Given how light the Government’s legislative programme is, does the right hon. Gentleman think that now is the time to consider whether we can debate private Members’ Bills not only on Fridays but on other days of the week, rather than having the countless pointless debates that we currently have to endure?

Asked by
Ann McKechin (Labour)
Answering body
Leader of the House of Commons
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
17 January 2013
Reference
556 c1022
House
House of Commons

I am surprised that the hon. Lady considers that the Government have a light programme; that is certainly not the view on the Government Benches. The House has expressed a view on private Members’ Bills. It has thought it appropriate to leave them where they are.

Answered by
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Leader of the House of Commons
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 January 2013
Reference
556 c1022
House
House of Commons

When the Leader of the House and his deputy prepare their evidence, will they consider holding the Committee stage of the Bill on equal marriage on the Floor of the House?

Asked by
Angela C Smith (Labour)
Answering body
Leader of the House of Commons
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
17 January 2013
Reference
556 c1022
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Lady for that question about a matter that has been raised before. The Government want to allow suitable scrutiny of the Bill and I am sure that the Government will provide it.

Answered by
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Leader of the House of Commons
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 January 2013
Reference
556 c1022
House
House of Commons
To ask the Leader of the House, whether he plans to give evidence to the Procedure Committee inquiry on programming.
Asked by
Ann McKechin (Labour)
Answering body
Leader of the House of Commons
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
17 January 2013
Reference
137525; 556 cc1021-2
House
House of Commons

The time that the Government have in the House is for their legislative programme. That is why we are spending time on the Electoral Registration and Administration Bill and why we had the Second Reading of the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill on Monday. I was referring yesterday to Opposition...

Member
Lord Young of Cookham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 June 2012
Reference
546 c479
House
House of Commons