Skip to main content

1-20 of 369 results for subject:"Divorce settlements"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment he has made of the adequacy of legislation protecting victims of crimes of a highly serious nature when their spouse has committed the crime against them in relation to distributing marital assets.

Asked by
Tom Morrison (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
11503
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the protocol is for distributing matrimonial assets following a crime of a highly serious nature committed by a spouse against the other a) pre and b) post-conviction.

Asked by
Tom Morrison (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
11496
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, whether his Department will make an assessment of the potential merits of making injury-related pension enhancement and compensation elements protected within divorce settlements.

Asked by
Jo Platt (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 February 2026
Reference
109826
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if she will make it her policy to prevent (a) AFPS 05 injury enhancements and (b) other injury related Armed Forces payments from being treated as divisible marital assets in (i) divorce and (ii) financial remedy proceedings.

Asked by
Jo Platt (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
105844
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what his policy is on the treatment of injury related Armed Forces payments, including the AFPS 05 injury enhancement, in divorce and financial remedy proceedings in England and Wales.

Asked by
Jo Platt (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 January 2026
Reference
105843
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Torsten Bell
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
27 November 2025
Reference
SI 2025/1220
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

Lords question for short debate on, following the Law Commission's Financial Remedies Scoping Report published in December 2024, what consideration they are giving to the reform of the law relating to financial provision on divorce.

Lead member
Baroness Deech
Answering member
Baroness Levitt
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Questions for short debate
Date
10 November 2025
Reference
849 cc88-103
House
House of Lords

My Lords, for nearly 50 years I have been calling for reform of the way assets are distributed on divorce, a law now contained in the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. In that time, divorce law itself has undergone profound changes and is now entirely no fault and administrative. In 1973,...

Member
Baroness Deech (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2025
Reference
849 cc88-90
House
House of Lords

I congratulate the noble Baroness, Lady Deech, on securing this debate, and her excellent and compelling speech. She and the noble Baroness, Lady Shackleton, deserve great credit for their campaign and persistence in pressing for action on this matter.

The Law Commission report strongly supports the noble Baronesses’ arguments that the...

Member
Lord Mendelsohn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2025
Reference
849 cc90-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I happily join the congratulations the noble Lord, Lord Mendelsohn, gave to the noble Baroness, Lady Deech, on getting this timely debate, and the firm tone in which she addressed the Minister and the Government: for heaven’s sake, get on and do something and do not let things...

Member
Lord Patten (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2025
Reference
849 cc91-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too am delighted that the noble Baroness, Lady Deech, has put forward this Question. I support much of what the noble Lord, Lord Patten, said about the importance of children and the fact that they are, in many ways, not properly recognised when we look at financial...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2025
Reference
849 cc92-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Deech, for this debate. I feel humbled to follow the noble and learned Baroness, Lady Butler-Sloss. I have spoken on many occasions in your Lordships’ House about the urgent need for reform in relation to ancillary relief in divorce. Rather...

Member
Baroness Shackleton of Belgravia (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2025
Reference
849 cc93-4
House
House of Lords

Can I just finish quickly then? The president has announced that financial remedies are being taken out of the list, because there is no time to deal with them. The courts are being blocked by litigants in person and rich people and, in a situation where the law were clearer,...

Member
Baroness Shackleton of Belgravia (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2025
Reference
849 c94
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I join in thanking the noble Baroness, Lady Deech, for raising this question for further debate. The Law Commission’s thorough and balanced scoping report asks if it is agreed that the law needs reform and which of the four suggested models for reform should be preferred by the...

Member
Monica McWilliams
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2025
Reference
849 cc94-6
House
House of Lords

I, too, congratulate the noble Baroness, Lady Deech, on introducing this debate, and I congratulate her and the noble Baroness, Lady Shackleton, on their tenacity in bringing these issues before the House.

A lot has happened in society since the 1970s, when Parliament last intervened, and the heavy lifting in the...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2025
Reference
849 cc96-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I join in thanking my noble friend Lady Deech for again introducing this important debate. Her timeless and tireless tenacity in pushing this thing forward is exemplary, and I commend her for all she has done in trying to reform this crucial part of family law.

The Law Commission’s...

Member
Lord St John of Bletso (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2025
Reference
849 cc97-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I start by declaring an interest in that, although I do no divorce work now, I once did, and I am still—rather by default, I fear—a member of the Family Law Bar Association. I join in congratulating the noble Baroness, Lady Deech, on introducing this debate in an...

Member
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2025
Reference
849 cc98-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, like everyone else who has spoken today, I am most grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Deech, for moving this debate so that the House can scrutinise this important matter. The Law Commission has produced a meticulous scoping report on financial remedies. It has put forward four clear...

Member
Lord Sandhurst (Crossbench; Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2025
Reference
849 cc99-100
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I begin by joining all other noble Lords in thanking the noble Baroness, Lady Deech, for securing this debate. The noble Baroness has, as other noble Lords have said, been unceasing in championing reform in this area, and I was very grateful to her for meeting me before...

Member
Baroness Levitt (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2025
Reference
849 cc100-1
House
House of Lords

I hesitate to interrupt, but does the Minister not appreciate that marriage is a status but non-marriage is not a status, and that the time has come for the two to be looked at separately: divorce on the one hand and how you look after those in other relationships on...

Member
Lord Sandhurst (Crossbench; Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2025
Reference
849 c102
House
House of Lords