Skip to main content

1-20 of 111 results for subject:"Double jeopardy"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The Attorney General has the power to refer to the Court of Appeal sentences for certain offences which they believe to be "unduly lenient". This power to refer is sometimes called the 'unduly lenient sentence scheme'.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
27 July 2026
Reference
SN00512

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if he will make an assessment of the potential merits of reviewing the threshold for reopening cases under the exception to the double jeopardy rule introduced by the Criminal Justice Act 2003.

Asked by
Andrew Snowden (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 September 2025
Reference
76881
House
House of Commons

Letter dated 05/07/2021 from Chris Philp MP to Charles Walker MP and Steve McCabe MP regarding the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill: letter to the House of Commons Committee, referencing topics raised during committee stage: child sexual offences, secure 16 to 19 academies, and repealing the Bail Act. 3p.

Deposited by
Ministry of Justice
Type
Deposited papers
Date
5 July 2021
Reference
DEP2021-0585
House
House of Commons

My Lords, there is an early opportunity, at the beginning of a Session, to raise these issues. As noble Lords will be aware, they have come up before. I want to make a brief comment and offer a way forward that I think may be helpful to both the Government...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2021
Reference
813 cc396-7
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Paddick

Member
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2021
Reference
813 c394
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord, Lord Paddick, for tabling this Motion—[Laughter.] I did mean that sincerely, although it might have come out all wrong. On the noble Lord’s second point, I join him in wishing my right honourable friend Minister Brokenshire all the very best for a speedy recovery. In...

Member
Baroness Williams of Trafford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2021
Reference
813 cc397-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have put down an amendment expressing regret at this order for two reasons. The first is to highlight to the House, if it needed highlighting, the volume and complexity of secondary legislation that this House is being asked to scrutinise. It is so vast and complex that...

Member
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2021
Reference
813 cc394-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Smith of Basildon, for her support and her helpful suggestion. The Minister said that standard procedures were followed in the amendment

of the (No. 2) Order and the original order. It should not be standard procedure that the only way...

Member
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2021
Reference
813 c398
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to approve. Amendment to regret debated and withdrawn. Original motion agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Williams of Trafford
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
24 June 2021
Reference
813 cc394-9
House
House of Lords

Amendment to clause 36, discussed with other amendments, a Government amendment, new clause 49 (Extraction of information from electronic devices), new clause 50 (Application of section [Extraction of information from electronic devices] to children and adults without capacity), new clause 51 (Application of section [Extraction of information from electronic devices]...

Lead member
Victoria Atkins; Chris Philp
Answering member
Alex Cunningham; Sarah Jones
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill Committee
Date
27 May 2021
House
House of Commons

Examination of witnesses. Written evidence reported to the House.

Lead member
Johnny Mercer
Answering member
Liz Twist
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Bill Committee
Date
6 October 2020
House
House of Commons

My Lords, I join other noble Lords in congratulating my noble friend Lady Brinton on introducing the Bill, which contains a range of careful and well-thought-out measures. In opening this debate, she introduced it in a comprehensive and persuasive way. It makes an overwhelming case for introducing statutory rights for...

Member
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 July 2019
Reference
799 cc519-522
House
House of Lords

Agreed to on question.

Lead member
David Lammy
Answering member
Robert Buckland
Department
Solicitor General
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
11 December 2017
Reference
633 c153
House
House of Commons

I wish to use this Adjournment debate to raise the case of Abdulkarim Boudiaf, a constituent of mine who tragically lost his life in Tottenham on 14 March 2009. As Members of Parliament, we are first and foremost representatives of our constituents: we are sent here to speak for them,...

Member
David Lammy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 December 2017
Reference
633 c146
House
House of Commons

I should like to congratulate the right hon. Gentleman for bringing this matter forward with such dedication. Does he agree that the reward offered for information in 2016 should

be reviewed, and that a renewed publicity campaign should be launched to seek justice for the family of this young man,...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 December 2017
Reference
633 c146
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is absolutely right. It is important that, when we offer incentives to the public to come forward, the sum involved is appropriate and the right amount to draw attention to the crime and to bring people out of the woodwork. The threshold in these sorts of cases...

Member
David Lammy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 December 2017
Reference
633 cc147-8
House
House of Commons

The Macpherson report will be 20 years old next year, and does my right hon. Friend share my concern that we still do not have the diversity in the workforce, particularly in the police, that we need so that communities are represented?

Member
Naz Shah (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 December 2017
Reference
633 c148
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is quite right that part of this story is about ensuring that Britain’s ethnic diversity is replicated across the criminal justice system at all levels. There has been some small progress in the Met police but, as my review found, we need to see diversity among the...

Member
David Lammy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 December 2017
Reference
633 cc148-150
House
House of Commons

I commend the right hon. Member for Tottenham (Mr Lammy) for movingly and persuasively putting his case on behalf of his constituents and for securing this Adjournment debate. I join him in expressing my regret and sadness that the family have not yet found justice for their son.

The right hon....

Member
Robert Buckland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 December 2017
Reference
633 cc150-4
House
House of Commons

Our armed forces make huge sacrifices, and plainly no current or former serving member should face unwarranted investigation. However, where there are credible serious allegations of criminal behaviour, they must be investigated; I think that everyone in the military world understands that. It is important to make rapid progress with the Iraq Historic Allegation Team’s caseload. The team expects the caseload to have reduced from the original 3,300 cases to about 250 by early January.

Answered by
Oliver Heald (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
1 November 2016
Reference
616 c776
House
House of Commons