Skip to main content

1-20 of 409 results for subject:"Duggan, Mark"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Home Affairs Committee
Date
11 February 2014
Reference
HC 983 2013-14
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Taylor of Holbeach on 20 January (WA 112), on the coroner's invitation to the Duggan family to submit their views on the use of police firearms for his consideration, whether they intend to issue guidance to coroners on...

Asked by
Lord Stoddart of Swindon (Independent Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 February 2014
Reference
HL4860; 752 c3WA
House
House of Lords
Deposited by
Home Office
Type
Deposited papers
Date
27 January 2014
Reference
DEP2014-0451
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department who ordered the vehicle in which Mark Duggan had been travelling to be removed from the crime scene without forensic examination.

Asked by
George Galloway (Respect Party)
Answering body
Home Department
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 January 2014
Reference
183750; 574 c379W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) if she will order an inquiry into the police handling of the fatal shooting of Mark Duggan;

Asked by
George Galloway (Respect Party)
Answering body
Home Department
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 January 2014
Reference
183788; 574 cc379-380W
House
House of Commons

(2) what steps she has taken to identify and discipline (a) Metropolitan Police officers and (b) members of the Independent Police Complaints Commission who claimed after his death that Mark Duggan had exchanged gunfire with officers.

George Galloway:

Asked by
George Galloway (Respect Party)
Answering body
Home Department
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 January 2014
Reference
183753; 574 cc379-380W
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they support the stated intention of the coroner in the Mark Duggan inquest to invite the Duggan family to help shape police firearm procedures.[HL4619]

Asked by
Lord Stoddart of Swindon (Independent Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 January 2014
Reference
HL4619; 751 c112WA
House
House of Lords
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Home Affairs Committee
Date
14 January 2014
Reference
HC 983 2013-14
House
House of Commons

And you made yourself a Privy Counsellor.

Member
Stephen Phillips (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2012
Reference
551 c579
House
House of Commons

I think it is the only way I will get promotion these days.

It is an anomaly that we have so many other sources of sensitive information that can be used in UK courts. What is so special about intercept evidence? The objections to its use—certainly those from Chilcot and other...

Member
Dominic Raab (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2012
Reference
551 cc579-580
House
House of Commons

I have long thought, partly as a result of the Northern Ireland experience, that our intelligence agencies are predisposed to go for disruption rather than prosecution. The whole nexus of the things my hon. Friend describes, their attitude to the use of intercept evidence and the problems addressing the exponential...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2012
Reference
551 c580
House
House of Commons

I thank my right hon. Friend for his intervention and agree entirely. The other point to make is that the disruption model that has previously been used was shown to fail because of the huge increase in the number of terrorism suspects that successive heads of MI5 made clear in...

Member
Dominic Raab (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2012
Reference
551 c581
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for the opportunity to speak briefly in this debate. I confess that I hesitated to contribute, given the authoritative speeches made so far, especially by the right hon. Member for Haltemprice and Howden (Mr Davis), who speaks with great authority, and by the hon. Member for Esher...

Member
Jim Fitzpatrick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2012
Reference
551 cc581-2
House
House of Commons

Like the hon. Member for Poplar and Limehouse (Jim Fitzpatrick), I hesitated to rise in this debate; I congratulate the right hon. Member for Tottenham (Mr Lammy) on having secured it. His contribution and those of my right hon. Friend the Member for Haltemprice and Howden (Mr Davis) and my...

Member
Stephen Phillips (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2012
Reference
551 cc582-3
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my right hon. Friend the Member for Tottenham (Mr Lammy) on an excellent speech. He was, as usual, a very powerful advocate for his constituents and his constituency, and for open justice, which is very important. The right hon. Member for Haltemprice and Howden (Mr Davis), a near...

Member
Diana Johnson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2012
Reference
551 cc583-5
House
House of Commons

I will put to one side one of the weaknesses of the Privy Council report, namely its assessment of the effectiveness of intercept in prosecutions, and take up the issue of control orders. When we eventually allowed the use of control orders, our presumption when in opposition was that they...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2012
Reference
551 c585
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman raises an issue that could be debated for many hours. I think that his first point—that evidence was available—is the correct one. However, a review has taken place and the view of the independent counsel, who was commissioned by the Home Office, is that what the...

Member
Diana Johnson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2012
Reference
551 cc585-7
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the right hon. Member for Tottenham (Mr Lammy), as other Members have done, on securing the debate. As it is a Back-Bench debate, I am conscious of the need to allow him some time to respond at the end, so I will try to keep my comments to...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2012
Reference
551 cc587-9
House
House of Commons

I apologise that I was not in the Chamber to hear some of the earlier speeches. I have listened carefully to the Minister. Given what he has just said, will the Government think again about their decision not to provide for a closed material procedure for inquests—something they are prepared...

Member
Paul Goggins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2012
Reference
551 c588
House
House of Commons

As the right hon. Gentleman knows, that matter was considered during discussions on the Justice and Security Bill currently in the other place, but the Government have determined that at this time it is not appropriate to bring those procedures forward. I hope, however, that the right hon. Gentleman heard...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2012
Reference
551 cc588-590
House
House of Commons