Skip to main content

1-20 of 49 results for subject:"Electoral Reform Services"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Senior Deputy Speaker, further to the Written Answers by the Chairman of Committees (Lord Laming) on 12 May 2016 (HL8153) and the Senior Deputy Speaker (Lord McFall of Alcluith) on 26 November (HL11454), why the cost of a Liberal Democrat hereditary peers' by-election, payable to Electoral Reform...

Asked by
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Answering body
The Senior Deputy Speaker
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 December 2018
Reference
HL11902
House
House of Lords

To ask the Senior Deputy Speaker whether he will publish the terms and conditions of the contract with the Electoral Reform Services for their services in relation to hereditary peers' by-elections.

Asked by
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Answering body
The Senior Deputy Speaker
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 September 2018
Reference
HL9783
House
House of Lords

To ask the Senior Deputy Speaker whether he will publish the terms of the agreement with Electoral Reform Services to administer the hereditary peers’ by-elections, including the fees paid and the length of the contract.

Asked by
Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Labour)
Answering body
The Senior Deputy Speaker
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 March 2017
Reference
HL5820
House
House of Lords

To ask the Chairman of Committees, further to the Written Answer by the Chairman of Committees on 28 April (HL7763), what was the total cost for the services provided by Electoral Reform Services (ERS) for the recent hereditary peer by-election following the death of Lord Avebury, and what, in particular,...

Asked by
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Answering body
The Lord Chairman of Committees
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 May 2016
Reference
HL8153
House
House of Lords

To ask the Chairman of Committees, in the light of the publication on 19 April of the result of the Hereditary Peers By-election, whether he will publish the contract with Electoral Reform Services to supervise and conduct the poll and count.

Asked by
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Answering body
The Lord Chairman of Committees
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 April 2016
Reference
HL7763
House
House of Lords

To ask the Chairman of Committees what fees were paid, if any, to Electoral Reform Services for conducting each of the last four Hereditary Peers By-elections.

Asked by
Lord Steel of Aikwood (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
The Lord Chairman of Committees
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 April 2016
Reference
HL7813
House
House of Lords

To ask the Chairman of Committees how much has been paid to Electoral Reform Services for their supervision of each hereditary peers by-election since the start of the 2014–15 session in the House of Lords.

Asked by
Lord Trefgarne (Conservative)
Answering body
The Lord Chairman of Committees
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 November 2015
Reference
HL3657
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the Electoral Commission will be reporting on the administration of the May 2011 referendum and elections, as required under Section 5 of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000, and will be considering the role of suppliers and other delivery partners as part of its review process.
Answered by
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 May 2011
Reference
727 c892
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I do not believe that there is a conflict of interest. It is a separate organisation. The Electoral Reform Society has over many years had a reputation for integrity, which has resulted in it being used by trade unions, non-governmental organisations and a wide range of other bodies, including the House of Lords, and it is pretty cheap to try to make this linkage. We have machinery that the party opposite put in place. Let us see what the electoral body says in its report and we will then look into the matter further. However, I do not believe that there is a conflict of interest and I have great confidence in the integrity of the Electoral Reform Society and its separate subsidiaries.
Answered by
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 May 2011
Reference
727 c893
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I can well understand the reason for this Question. It was probably to do with the inquest that went on in the Glasgow Labour Party about the reason that Glasgow Kelvin voted so overwhelmingly yes. As we know, what Kelvin does today, the world does tomorrow. My noble friend’s point is absolutely right.
Answered by
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 May 2011
Reference
727 c892
House
House of Lords
I thank the Minister for his useful Answer. Glasgow City Council sent out the AV ballot paper to postal voters separately from the other ballot papers. The council did that on the advice of a company called Electoral Services Limited, which the council uses to run its elections. That company in the recent past gave its parent company, the Electoral Reform Society, £1 million in advance, which was promptly handed over to the yes campaign for the referendum. Will the Minister bring forward legislation to ensure that that organisation, or any organisation involved in the running of elections, is not allowed to participate when clearly there is a vested interest?
Asked by
Lord McAvoy (Labour)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 May 2011
Reference
727 c892
House
House of Lords
My goodness. What is that saying—in victory magnanimity? The decision to engage that company was the decision of Glasgow council. The chief counting officer, Jenny Watson, said: "““We have put in place detailed and comprehensive arrangements for monitoring the performance of Counting Officers and their suppliers, and I have no reason to believe that there is any risk to the integrity of the administration of the postal voting process””."
Answered by
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 May 2011
Reference
727 c892
House
House of Lords
My Lords, does not my noble friend miss the point? He was asked specifically about the conflict of interest, not misconduct. Can he now address the question that the noble Lord, Lord McAvoy, asked about conflict of interest?
Asked by
Lord Ryder of Wensum (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 May 2011
Reference
727 c893
House
House of Lords
The Clock was showing 29 minutes when I stood up. Does the Minister agree that there is a world of difference between looking after the election of office-bearers in a trade union or any other organisation and being involved in a referendum which is about the electoral system and being connected with something called the Electoral Reform Society? Does that not strike the Minister as something different from the norm?
Asked by
Baroness Ramsay of Cartvale (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 May 2011
Reference
727 c893-4
House
House of Lords
My Lords, does my noble friend agree that issues such as the supply of envelopes for postal vote mailings should be made on an entirely commercial basis, based on value for money and reliability of service, and that if there were ever any issues of either impropriety in the ballot or failure to deliver, it would be a matter for the Electoral Commission to report which, as he said, will happen shortly?
Asked by
Lord Rennard (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 May 2011
Reference
727 c892
House
House of Lords
No, it does not. I know that the noble Baroness comes from Kelvin and so must be particularly bitter about the election but such a suggestion really does not stand up. Even by the standards of the noble Lord, Lord McAvoy, this is unworthy of the party opposite.
Answered by
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 May 2011
Reference
727 c893-4
House
House of Lords
It is a serious matter, and the systems for monitoring whether those elections have gone through properly are in place. As I said in my reply, we will be getting a full report and I have every confidence that the election will have been carried out with the utmost integrity. One interesting thing about the recent elections is the lack of criticisms about conduct compared with the many criticisms that came about during the general election. Therefore, we are making progress and I really do not think that the issue that the noble Lord, Lord McAvoy, has raised is sustainable.
Answered by
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 May 2011
Reference
727 c893
House
House of Lords
My Lords, this is a serious matter. The Minister, like me, is a football supporter. How would he feel if the manager of the other team was also appointed as the referee—because that is effectively what happened? Will he ensure that neither the Electoral Reform Society nor any of its subsidiaries are involved in monitoring such elections in future?
Asked by
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 May 2011
Reference
727 c893
House
House of Lords
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what was the involvement of the Electoral Reform Society or of Electoral Reform Services in the procedure used to send out postal ballot papers in the alternative vote referendum in the Glasgow division.
Asked by
Lord McAvoy (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
11 May 2011
Reference
727 c892
House
House of Lords
The Minister might be aware that the Office of Fair Trading is receiving complaints about the market dominance and business practices of Electoral Reform Services. Will he encourage the OFT to be more attentive and responsive to those complaints than it has been to previous complaints?
Asked by
Mark Durkan (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Answering body
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
31 March 2011
Reference
526 c517
House
House of Commons