1-20 of 3,304 results for subject:"Electronic tagging"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.283 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.007 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Electronic tagging"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Electronic tagging" OR subject_t:Microchipping OR subject_ses:91094
Type
House
Session
More
Year
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
More
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if he will provide an update on his department's work on the national proximity monitoring technology pilot and information on when the pilot is expected to begin.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if he will provide an update on his department's work on the national proximity monitoring technology pilot and information on when the pilot is expected to begin.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what information his Department holds on (a) how many individuals are awaiting installation of an electronic monitoring device in each police force area, (b) the average waiting time, and (c) the number of outstanding installation visits.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what information his Department holds on (a) how many individuals are awaiting installation of an electronic monitoring device in each police force area, (b) the average waiting time, and (c) the number of outstanding installation visits.
While the Ministry of Justice centrally holds and publishes data about individuals without electronic monitoring equipment and the reasons for this, the reasons do not distinguish between those who are awaiting installation from those who are not (due to being without equipment for other reasons such as recently returning to custody).
The Ministry of Justice works closely with the service provider to monitor a suite of performance indicators including timeliness of equipment installation attempts. A number of contractual levers exist where performance falls below contractual expectations.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what information his Department holds on (a) how many electronic monitoring breaches were recorded in each police force area during the latest 12-month period, and (b) of the breaches recorded, how many resulted in (i) enforcement action, (ii) recall to custody, (iii)...
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what information his Department holds on (a) how many electronic monitoring breaches were recorded in each police force area during the latest 12-month period, and (b) of the breaches recorded, how many resulted in (i) enforcement action, (ii) recall to custody, (iii)...
The Ministry of Justice does not hold data on individual police forces. However, the Department works closely with the National Police Chiefs Council through a dedicated liaison embedded in HMPPS on a range of common challenges, including Electronic Monitoring of bail cases.
The Ministry of Justice does not hold data centrally on electronic monitoring breaches or outcomes of these breaches.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether the Ministry of Justice has made an estimate of the volume of police activity arising from electronic monitoring and bail-tag breaches; and whether this information is available at police force area level.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether the Ministry of Justice has made an estimate of the volume of police activity arising from electronic monitoring and bail-tag breaches; and whether this information is available at police force area level.
The Ministry of Justice does not hold data on individual police forces. However, the Department works closely with the National Police Chiefs Council through a dedicated liaison embedded in HMPPS on a range of common challenges, including Electronic Monitoring of bail cases.
The Ministry of Justice does not hold data centrally on electronic monitoring breaches or outcomes of these breaches.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what information his Department holds on how many individuals in each police force area are subject to electronic monitoring, broken down by licence, community order, suspended sentence order and bail requirement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what information his Department holds on how many individuals in each police force area are subject to electronic monitoring, broken down by licence, community order, suspended sentence order and bail requirement.
Data on the total number of individuals assigned with electronic monitoring (EM) equipment by cohort as at 30 June 2026 can be found in the department’s latest published statistics on EM : Electronic Monitoring Statistics Publication, June 2026 - GOV.UK.
A further breakdown of this data by police force area has been provided in Table 1 below. This is derived from the same underlying data and constitutes a subset of the published statistics as at 30 June 2026 (linked above).
Table 1: Number of individuals assigned with EM equipment by region and cohort, 30 June 2026
Month | Police Force Area | Court Bail | Court Sentence | Immigration | Post Release | TOTAL |
30/06/2026 | Avon and Somerset | 120 | 130 | 70 | 280 | 600 |
30/06/2026 | Bedfordshire | 180 | 50 | 70 | 150 | 450 |
30/06/2026 | Cambridgeshire | 80 | 50 | 60 | 130 | 320 |
30/06/2026 | Cheshire | 80 | 90 | 20 | 220 | 410 |
30/06/2026 | Cleveland | 80 | 70 | 30 | 140 | 320 |
30/06/2026 | Cumbria | 30 | 60 | 10 | 100 | 200 |
30/06/2026 | Derbyshire | 90 | 60 | 40 | 220 | 410 |
30/06/2026 | Devon & Cornwall | 100 | 90 | 40 | 190 | 420 |
30/06/2026 | Dorset | 60 | 30 | 20 | 100 | 210 |
30/06/2026 | Durham | 80 | 30 | 10 | 150 | 270 |
30/06/2026 | Dyfed-Powys | 30 | 40 | 10 | 60 | 140 |
30/06/2026 | Essex | 370 | 140 | 100 | 380 | 990 |
30/06/2026 | Gloucestershire | 20 | 50 | 30 | 70 | 170 |
30/06/2026 | Greater Manchester | 660 | 180 | 240 | 650 | 1,730 |
30/06/2026 | Gwent | 50 | 50 | 10 | 140 | 250 |
30/06/2026 | Hampshire | 250 | 100 | 70 | 230 | 650 |
30/06/2026 | Hertfordshire | 120 | 50 | 50 | 140 | 360 |
30/06/2026 | Humberside | 80 | 60 | 40 | 180 | 360 |
30/06/2026 | Kent | 350 | 170 | 90 | 340 | 950 |
30/06/2026 | Lancashire | 300 | 150 | 80 | 440 | 970 |
30/06/2026 | Leicestershire | 100 | 30 | 80 | 150 | 360 |
30/06/2026 | Lincolnshire | 40 | 30 | 30 | 100 | 200 |
30/06/2026 | London, City of | - | - | - | - | - |
30/06/2026 | Merseyside | 160 | 130 | 70 | 540 | 900 |
30/06/2026 | Metropolitan Police | 2,470 | 570 | 1,070 | 1,300 | 5,410 |
30/06/2026 | Norfolk | 120 | 60 | 40 | 80 | 300 |
30/06/2026 | North Wales | 20 | 130 | 10 | 170 | 330 |
30/06/2026 | North Yorkshire | 30 | 40 | - | 70 | 140 |
30/06/2026 | Northamptonshire | 100 | 50 | 60 | 120 | 330 |
30/06/2026 | Northern Ireland | - | - | 50 | - | 50 |
30/06/2026 | Northumbria | 200 | 70 | 40 | 240 | 550 |
30/06/2026 | Nottinghamshire | 160 | 60 | 70 | 330 | 620 |
30/06/2026 | Scotland | - | - | 120 | - | 120 |
30/06/2026 | South Wales | 110 | 100 | 50 | 370 | 630 |
30/06/2026 | South Yorkshire | 150 | 50 | 100 | 210 | 510 |
30/06/2026 | Staffordshire | 170 | 60 | 40 | 220 | 490 |
30/06/2026 | Suffolk | 50 | 70 | 20 | 100 | 240 |
30/06/2026 | Surrey | 120 | 50 | 30 | 100 | 300 |
30/06/2026 | Sussex | 140 | 80 | 60 | 170 | 450 |
30/06/2026 | Thames Valley | 240 | 160 | 140 | 360 | 900 |
30/06/2026 | Warwickshire | 50 | 20 | 20 | 110 | 200 |
30/06/2026 | West Mercia | 140 | 70 | 30 | 150 | 390 |
30/06/2026 | West Midlands | 850 | 190 | 270 | 940 | 2,250 |
30/06/2026 | West Yorkshire | 370 | 180 | 170 | 470 | 1,190 |
30/06/2026 | Wiltshire | 40 | 30 | 20 | 60 | 150 |
30/06/2026 | Unknown | 60 | 40 | 370 | 190 | 660 |
Table notes:
All figures have been rounded to the nearest 10. Where a figure is 0, or is rounded to 0, this will be shown as "-". The total caseload is a total of the rounded cohort figures shown.
These figures are drawn from administrative data systems provided by contractors. Although care is taken when processing and analysing the returns, the detail collected is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in individual-level administrative data.
The "Unknown" region reflects the small proportion of individuals in the caseload who do not have recorded location data.
Figures exclude special orders.
The "Total" column reflects total counts across the cohorts. Due to rounding, the total counts for each cohort across the regions may differ slightly from the total counts nationally for that cohort.
Further information on counting rules and methodology can be found in the linked statistical publication.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to the National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority Major Projects Annual Report 2025 to 2026, Tables, Electronic Monitoring Expansion, what progress he has made on implementing legacy contract extensions.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to the National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority Major Projects Annual Report 2025 to 2026, Tables, Electronic Monitoring Expansion, what progress he has made on implementing legacy contract extensions.
The National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority (NISTA) Major Projects Annual Report 2025-26 set out plans for the Electronic Monitoring Expansion Programme to expand the impact, use and efficiency of electronic monitoring as a tool for the management of offenders in the community, helping reduce re-offending and protecting the public. This programme included among other things the introduction of alcohol tagging, a new approach to Domestic Abuse Perpetrators on Licence and the Acquisitive Crime project.
NISTA’s report also sets out aims to retender the Electronic Monitoring Service, which has since been delivered. The legacy contract extensions were aligned to the Electronic Monitoring expansion programme, which has since completed, with various elements moving into national rollout or with plans to do so. As the Field and Monitoring Services and Monitoring Device and System Services contracts are now live and the implementation has concluded, the legacy contracts have all now ceased.
The latest figures on the number of individuals with Electronic Monitoring (EM) equipment (from June 2025 to June 2026) can be found here: Electronic Monitoring Statistics Publication, June 2026 - GOV.UK. Please note that EM statistics presented in this release are not directly comparable with those published before June 2025. This is due to changes in both the definition (from ‘tagged’ to ‘assigned with EM equipment’) and methodology used to classify individuals.
Publication of EM statistics was paused between June 2024 and June 2025 following the contract transition from Capita to Serco. This enabled statistical processes to be adapted for the new data source and provided time to assess data quality and accuracy. The latest published EM statistics pre-June 2025 can be found here, which show time series data from March 2017 to June 2024: Electronic Monitoring Statistics Publication, June 2024 - GOV.UK.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to the National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority Major Projects Annual Report 2025 to 2026, Tables, Electronic Monitoring Expansion, by how much has demand for Electronic Monitoring Services increased.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to the National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority Major Projects Annual Report 2025 to 2026, Tables, Electronic Monitoring Expansion, by how much has demand for Electronic Monitoring Services increased.
The National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority (NISTA) Major Projects Annual Report 2025-26 set out plans for the Electronic Monitoring Expansion Programme to expand the impact, use and efficiency of electronic monitoring as a tool for the management of offenders in the community, helping reduce re-offending and protecting the public. This programme included among other things the introduction of alcohol tagging, a new approach to Domestic Abuse Perpetrators on Licence and the Acquisitive Crime project.
NISTA’s report also sets out aims to retender the Electronic Monitoring Service, which has since been delivered. The legacy contract extensions were aligned to the Electronic Monitoring expansion programme, which has since completed, with various elements moving into national rollout or with plans to do so. As the Field and Monitoring Services and Monitoring Device and System Services contracts are now live and the implementation has concluded, the legacy contracts have all now ceased.
The latest figures on the number of individuals with Electronic Monitoring (EM) equipment (from June 2025 to June 2026) can be found here: Electronic Monitoring Statistics Publication, June 2026 - GOV.UK. Please note that EM statistics presented in this release are not directly comparable with those published before June 2025. This is due to changes in both the definition (from ‘tagged’ to ‘assigned with EM equipment’) and methodology used to classify individuals.
Publication of EM statistics was paused between June 2024 and June 2025 following the contract transition from Capita to Serco. This enabled statistical processes to be adapted for the new data source and provided time to assess data quality and accuracy. The latest published EM statistics pre-June 2025 can be found here, which show time series data from March 2017 to June 2024: Electronic Monitoring Statistics Publication, June 2024 - GOV.UK.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps his Department is taking to ensure Local Criminal Justice Boards can access local electronic monitoring data, specifically (a) individuals subject to monitoring, (b) outstanding tagging installations, (c) breach notifications and officer alerts, and (d) enforcement outcomes following breaches.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps his Department is taking to ensure Local Criminal Justice Boards can access local electronic monitoring data, specifically (a) individuals subject to monitoring, (b) outstanding tagging installations, (c) breach notifications and officer alerts, and (d) enforcement outcomes following breaches.
Current Local Criminal Justice Board guidance encourages criminal justice partners to share the data and analysis that the Boards need to understand local performance, emerging trends and cross-system challenges.
Sir Brian Leveson’s Independent Review of the Criminal Courts highlighted the importance of the Boards in supporting effective local criminal justice delivery and made recommendations relating to their future role and operation. The Government is considering these recommendations as part of its wider response to the Review.
Lords statement on the implementation of the Sentencing Act 2026.
Lords statement on the implementation of the Sentencing Act 2026.
My Lords, the exodus that we have just seen was about as chaotic as the Government’s plans that we are about to debate. However, I thank the Minister for providing us with the opportunity to ask questions.
This latest Statement represents the fifth early release scheme that has been announced since...
My Lords, the exodus that we have just seen was about as chaotic as the Government’s plans that we are about to debate. However, I thank the Minister for providing us with the opportunity to ask questions.
This latest Statement represents the fifth early release scheme that has been announced since...
My Lords, we agree with the Statement that the Government clearly inherited a crisis of prison spaces, and a crisis in our criminal justice system as a whole. Frankly, the crisis was clearly attributable to many years of neglect, principally under the last Government. The Sentencing Act was a timely...
My Lords, we agree with the Statement that the Government clearly inherited a crisis of prison spaces, and a crisis in our criminal justice system as a whole. Frankly, the crisis was clearly attributable to many years of neglect, principally under the last Government. The Sentencing Act was a timely...
My Lords, I begin by declaring my interest. I was the lead non-executive director and chaired the agency board of His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service until March 2025. Last week the Lord Chancellor set out in the other place changes to the implementation of the Sentencing Act 2026 to...
My Lords, I begin by declaring my interest. I was the lead non-executive director and chaired the agency board of His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service until March 2025. Last week the Lord Chancellor set out in the other place changes to the implementation of the Sentencing Act 2026 to...
It goes back beyond that.
It goes back beyond that.
Yes, it goes back beyond that, but the intensity has not gone away. The answer cannot be a succession of emergency measures. The noble Lord, Lord Wolfson, said the Government had introduced various emergency measures. Well, we needed to, because the previous Government refused to act. Parliament legislated through the...
Yes, it goes back beyond that, but the intensity has not gone away. The answer cannot be a succession of emergency measures. The noble Lord, Lord Wolfson, said the Government had introduced various emergency measures. Well, we needed to, because the previous Government refused to act. Parliament legislated through the...
My Lords, with regard to excluding those convicted of manslaughter from early release, should we not keep in mind that manslaughter involves varying degrees of culpability, from the very serious to those which are less serious? There are cases involving, for example, a high degree of provocation or diminished responsibility,...
My Lords, with regard to excluding those convicted of manslaughter from early release, should we not keep in mind that manslaughter involves varying degrees of culpability, from the very serious to those which are less serious? There are cases involving, for example, a high degree of provocation or diminished responsibility,...
I entirely agree with those comments from the noble Viscount. That is absolutely right. We obviously have to be consistent in the way we apply these exemptions, but the variation he points to is exactly right.
I entirely agree with those comments from the noble Viscount. That is absolutely right. We obviously have to be consistent in the way we apply these exemptions, but the variation he points to is exactly right.
My Lord, I warmly welcome this Statement. The Government’s commitment to end the IPP scandal, as has been mentioned, is long overdue. A transition with public protection at its heart is the right way forward, but may I suggest that we start straightaway with what I call the low-hanging fruit:...
My Lord, I warmly welcome this Statement. The Government’s commitment to end the IPP scandal, as has been mentioned, is long overdue. A transition with public protection at its heart is the right way forward, but may I suggest that we start straightaway with what I call the low-hanging fruit:...
I thank my noble friend and pay tribute to him for the work that he has done, along with many other noble Lords on all sides of the House, to move us forward on the question of IPPs and how we regularise the situation. I should reinforce this: it goes...
I thank my noble friend and pay tribute to him for the work that he has done, along with many other noble Lords on all sides of the House, to move us forward on the question of IPPs and how we regularise the situation. I should reinforce this: it goes...
My Lords—
My Lords—