1-20 of 174 results for subject:"Estate Action"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.364 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.003 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Estate Action"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Estate Action" OR subject_ses:18179
Type
-
Early day motions (2)
+
Members' contributions (34)
-
Oral answers to questions (17)
+
Oral questions (17)
-
Prime Minister's questions (2)
+
Parliamentary committees (1)
+
Committee proceedings (1)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
+
Parliamentary papers (9)
-
Consultation papers (2)
-
Deposited papers (7)
-
House of Commons papers (2)
+
Parliamentary proceedings (4)
+
Debates (4)
-
Adjournment debates (1)
+
Committee proceedings (1)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
-
Opposition days (2)
+
Parliamentary questions (143)
+
Oral questions (17)
-
Prime Minister's questions (2)
-
Written questions (126)
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Deputy Prime Minister, what the total expenditure by his Department was on each estate action programme in the borough of Tower Hamlets since 1985; and what this was as a percentage of the total cost of each programme. - Including table.
To ask the Deputy Prime Minister, what the total expenditure by his Department was on each estate action programme in the borough of Tower Hamlets since 1985; and what this was as a percentage of the total cost of each programme. - Including table.
Asked by
Baroness King of Bow
(Labour)
Answered by
Nick Raynsford
(Labour)
Answering body
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
24 September 2002
For answer on
17 October 2002
Answered on
17 October 2002
Ms Oona King: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what the total expenditure by his Department was on each estate action programme in
the borough of Tower Hamlets since 1985; and what this was as a percentage of the total cost of each programme. [74146]
Mr. Nick Raynsford: The records of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets show the total expenditure for each of the estate action
projects in Tower Hamlets since 1985, and the Department's contribution as a percentage of the total cost of each project are:
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Estate Action Schemes Total Cost of Project £m Departmental contribution as % of Total
cost
Aberfeldy Estate 0.764 50
All Estates on Isle of Dogs 14.1 100
Anglsey House 0.378 100
Ashpark House 0.32 100
Bancroft 9.556 46
Barkentine 42.46 92
Barkentine 3 22.034 98
Barley Mow Estate 4.466 54
Bazely Estate 0.392 55
Bengal House 5.122 61
Berner Estate 1.766 100
Bethnal Green Estate 3.414 36
Birchfield House 1.301 62
Boundary Estate 1.964 63
Bow Bridge 0.16 100
Brinsley House Tarling East 0.88 100
British Street 2.295 12
Brownfield Estate 2.593 7
Brune House Complex 1.938 61
Burley House 0.6 100
Burnham Estate 0.971 68
Channel House-Ocean Estate 2.265 67
Chicksand Estate 2.418 77
Christchurch 0.511 45
Cleveland Estate 0.796 69
Coventry Cross East 0.23 100
Coventry Cross West 0.28 100
Cranbrook Estate 4.19 24
Cranford Cottages 0.12 100
Crossways 0.15 100
Cubitt Town-Thermopylae Gate 1.042 32
Digby Greenways 10.57 63
Dorian Estate all blocks in Stepney 0.307 100
Galleon House 4.192 78
Holland 0.712 97
Isle of Dogs 3.5 100
Jefferson Estate.Madison & 50 2.754
John Scurr 4.807 46
Lefevre Walk 9.769 85
Leobold Building 9.544 43
Limehouse Fields 1.347 85
Limehouse Fields 0.705 71
Lincoln Estate 1.3 100
Locton 1.959 52
Maddocks House Tarling West 0.87 100
Malmesbury 0.5 100
Manchester Estate 2.685 98
Mansford 1.83 8
Martinu Estate 0.886 100
Mercers, mountmorres, 0.2 100
Midhurst House 0.32 100
Minerva 2.67 100
Monteith Estate 8.583 52
Newdieate House 0.304 100
Ocean 2.594 73
Ocean (Bothnia, Malaka, Tunis) 1.7 76
Ocean (Play Area) 0.44 9
Ocean Estate Security Works 0.219 100
Ocean(Muslim Prayer facilities) 0.44 9
Parkview/Crankbrook 0.66 100
Perring Estate 1.484 50
Ranwell East 0.356 100
Ranwell West 1.09 69
Ring House-Martineau Estate 2 100
Riverside Estate 0.343 100
Robin Hood Gardens 1.516 77
Robin Hood Gardens 2 0.52 100
Roche Estate 3.003 81
Rogers Estate 2.78 64
Roman Road North 0.677 83
Samuda Estate 2.395 45
Samuda Estate phase 2 0.094 0
Samuda Estate. Hedley House 0.665 79
Samuda Housing Office 1.6 100
Sandhurst House 0.14 100
St Georges Estate 2.428 70
St John 1.844 85
St Peters 0.081 100
St Vincent 0.804 100
Studland House 0.5 100
Teviot Estate 1.07 49
Tredegar Road 0.45 100
Vaugham Estate 1.033 100
Wapping Estate 0 0
Watney market 19.027 85
Wellington 13.997 86
Winterton. 19.948 86
Total/Average 285.688 76
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Subjects
Costs; Capital investment; Expenditure; Housing improvement; Housing estates; Housing investment programme; Tower Hamlets; Estate Action
Date
17 October 2002
Reference
390 c922-4W;390 c943-4W; 74146
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, what was the total expenditure by his Department on each estate action progamme in the borough of Westminster since 1993; and what this was as a percentage of the total cost of each programme. - Inc tables.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, what was the total expenditure by his Department on each estate action progamme in the borough of Westminster since 1993; and what this was as a percentage of the total cost of each programme. - Inc tables.
Asked by
Karen Buck
(Labour)
Answered by
Baroness Hughes of Stretford
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
7 June 2000
For answer on
15 June 2000
Answered on
15 June 2000
Ms Buck: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions what was the total expenditure by his
Department on each estate action programme in the borough of Westminster since 1993; and what this was as a percentage of the total
cost of each programme. [125423]
Ms Beverley Hughes: The total expenditure for each of the estate action projects in Westminster since 1993 is as follows:
£
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Mozart Estate Lisson Green
1993-94 179,000 --
1994-95 1,500,000 1,136,000
1995-96 1,384,000 945,000
1996-97 2,180,000 1,955,000
1997-98 3,000,600 6,000,000
1998-99 3,200,000 2,660,000
1999-2000 600,000 1,701,400
Total 12,043,600 14,397,400
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
The total expenditure detailed above as a percentage of the total cost of programme is:
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Total cost of programme Percentage of grant expenditure against
total cost
Mozart Estate 37,636,000 32
Lisson Green 63,031,000 22.8
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Subjects
Costs; Capital investment; City of Westminster; Expenditure; Housing estates; Housing investment programme; Estate Action
Date
15 June 2000
Reference
125423; 351 c675W
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence;
Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee of Public Accounts
Subjects
Inland Revenue; Housing improvement; Housing estates; Private finance initiative; Newcastle upon Tyne; Social Security Contributions Agency; Estate Action; AMEC
Commons Library location
CS 246
Date
8 December 1999
Reference
HC 104-i 1999/2000
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers
Author
National Audit Office
Laid on
22 November 1999
Notes
ALSO SEE PAC HC 104 1999/2000; Received 30.11.99
Subjects
Contracts; Child benefit; Child Support Agency; Finance; Housing associations; Housing improvement; Housing estates; Private sector; Private finance initiative; Newcastle upon Tyne; Social Security Contributions Agency; Social Security Benefits Agency; Estate Action; Information Technology Services Agency; Newcastle Estate Partnership
Commons Library location
CS 243
Date
22 November 1999
Reference
HC 16 1999/2000
House
House of Commons
Statement on the Government's local economic development and regeneration policies. - Figs and ref to 'The Way Forward' (Cm 3814) Regional Development Agencies Bill. (Holding answer 18 June 1998).
Statement on the Government's local economic development and regeneration policies. - Figs and ref to 'The Way Forward' (Cm 3814) Regional Development Agencies Bill. (Holding answer 18 June 1998).
Asked by
Brian Jenkins
(Labour)
Answered by
Angela Eagle
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
10 June 1998
For answer on
22 June 1998
Answered on
22 June 1998
Mr. Jenkins: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions if he will make a statement on the
Government's local economic development and regeneration policies. [45852]
Angela Eagle: [holding answer 18 June 1998]: The Government are determined to join with local government, the voluntary and private
sectors and local communities in a concerted attack against the multiple causes of social and economic decline-- unemployment, bad
housing, crime, poor health and a degraded environment.
Regeneration policies will play a key part in this. The Government are therefore undertaking a comprehensive review of regeneration
policies. A discussion paper on the future of regeneration--"The Way Forward"--has been produced as a result of this review.
Regional Development Agencies (RDAs)
The White Paper on Regional Development Agencies (RDAs), "Building Partnerships for Prosperity" (Cm 3814), published on 3 December
1997, set out the Government's proposals for the creation of a new Regional Development Agency in each of the English Regions. The
Regional Development Agencies Bill, which had its Third Reading on 1 April 1998, Official Report, columns 1366-85, will put in place
the legislative framework for RDAs' work.
RDAs will provide the means for ensuring effective, properly co-ordinated regional economic development. One of their first and most
important tasks will be to draw up a regional economic strategy for their region. This will provide proper strategic direction to
regional economic development work: regeneration, inward investment, business support, skills training and sustainable development.
RDAs will contribute towards the better coordination of regeneration programmes by bringing together English Partnerships, the
Single Regeneration Budget Challenge Fund and the rural regeneration work of the Rural Development Commission. They will continue to
work with local partnerships formed between local authorities, business and the voluntary sector.
Single Regeneration Budget (SRB)
The Single Regeneration Budget (SRB) currently provides over £3.4 billion, in total, for the three years 1997-98 to 1999-2000.
Within the £3.4 billion SRB total, nearly £1.7 billion is currently allocated to some 550 partnership schemes under rounds 1 to 3 of
the SRB Challenge Fund.
The balance of available SRB resources--over £1.7 billion over the 3-year period--is currently allocated to fund commitments under
earlier programmes such as English Partnerships, UDCs, Housing Action Trusts, Estate Action, City Challenge etc. which all form part
of the SRB.
The Government announced, on 30 March 1998, the names of the 121 successful Partnerships under Round 4 of the SRB Challenge Fund
which stand to get over £300 million. Around £12 million will be available nationally for 1998-99.
Nearly all the 121 successful Round 4 schemes have multiple objectives, which include social exclusion, employment and training,
education, community safety, prevention of drug misuse, health care and child care. Over half of the schemes include support for
ethnic minorities as an explicit objective. This reflects local needs and priorities and the need to look across traditional
boundaries in finding solutions.
The Round 4 schemes aim to attract private sector support of over £400 million and other public sector contributions, including
European funding, of over £500 million over their lifetime of up to seven years. This investment will benefit over 600,000 school
children, provide training for 86,000 people, provide jobs for over 50,000 target area residents and benefit over 3 million people
from community safety initiatives.
During 1996-97 the SRB Challenge Fund supported schemes which attracted over £577 million of private sector leverage,
created/preserved over 78,000 jobs and helped to start up over 16,000 businesses.
English Partnerships: NDPB delivering regeneration, economic development, job creation, environmental improvement and promoting
inward investment through the reclamation and development of derelict, vacant and under-used land and buildings throughout England.
EP's Investment Fund provides a flexible means to tailor financial support for projects and enables EP to operate as a strategic
partner and investor in regeneration. Their Community Investment Fund provides capital grants of up to £100,000 to community based
projects and enables local communities to participate more effectively in the regeneration of their neighbourhoods.
Fifty-six British Coal non-operational sites, covering some 6,000 acres, have been transferred to EP who are taking forward their
regeneration, reclamation and development. EP have prepared a detailed investment plan including a development strategy for each
site. Paula Hay-Plumb, Managing Director (Operations) at EP has been appointed by the Deputy Prime Minister to chair a Coalfields
Task Force whose purpose is to identify and develop a specific programme of action to assist coal closure areas by pooling the
expertise of government departments and other partners in regeneration.
EP own the Greenwich Peninsula and are responsible for providing a serviced site for the Millennium Experience. EP have developed a
master plan for the long term regeneration of the site which would provide 5,000 homes and 335,300 jobs as well as commercial,
leisure, retail, community and education facilities. A competition for the first stage of the development--the Millennium
Village--was launched by the Deputy Prime Minister on 10 July 1997. Four shortlisted consortia submitted their bids on early January
1998 and the winner will be announced shortly.
Housing Action Trusts (HATs): There are 6 Housing Action Trusts regenerating severely run down housing estates, including
refurbishment/redevelopment, creation of jobs and training opportunities, and other improvements. HATs are planning their programmes
on the basis of a total public spend of £1,095 million on all HATs to the end of their 10 year lifetimes.
Estate Action: aims to help local authorities improve unpopular housing estates. Funding is currently for commitments only on
continuing schemes approved in 1994-95 or before.
There are also several other programmes which can help in the regeneration of deprived areas. These include:
The Special Grants Programme: a small but long standing programme (1997-98 budget £1.3 million) under which grants are given to
voluntary organisations undertaking national projects relevant to the Department's policy objectives in housing and regeneration.
Grant is generally limited to 3 years and to about half of each project's costs, the remainder coming from private and voluntary
sector sources.
Local Investment Fund (LIF): established in 1994 with £1 million grant and £2 million private sector contribution. LIF provides
loans on conventional terms to voluntary organisations for economically viable projects for which conventional finance cannot be
raised (e.g. due to lack of asset base, track record, etc.).
Groundwork: established in 1985 to tackle a range of environmental problems through partnership with the community and the private
sector. DETR provides funding to the Groundwork Foundation and its 41 Trusts in England, Wales and Northern Ireland (£6.675 million
for 1997-98).
Environment Task Force: one of four options available under the New Deal for the young unemployed. It aims to enhance the long term
employment prospects of 18-24 year olds, unemployed and claiming JSA for 6 months or more, through a combination of high quality
work experience and training leading to an approved qualification. The ETF will consist of projects which deliver sustainable
environmental benefits in line with DETR's policies and objectives.
Thames Gateway: a major growth opportunity with strong European connections, reinforced by stations on the Channel Tunnel Rail Link.
Thames Gateway Planning Framework (RPG9a) aims to maximise the area's potential and improve its image through environmental
enhancement and quality development.
Inner City Religious Council: chaired by Ministers, the ICRC provides the main faith communities with a means of working together to
tackle the problems facing inner cities and deprived areas. Its members are drawn from Christian, Hindu, Jewish, Muslim and Sikh
faiths. A review of the work of the ICRC has recently been carried out and its findings are being considered.
Local Authorities
Local authorities have a key role to play as catalysts for the economic development and regeneration of their areas. Under section
33 of the Local Government and Housing Act 1989 authorities have powers to promote the economic development of their area. We intend
to strengthen their role further by placing a duty on local authorities to promote the economic, social and environmental well being
of their area in partnership with other public, private and voluntary organisations, and with local people.
Subjects
Central government; Environment protection; Investment; Grants; Housing improvement; Inner city areas; English Partnerships; Groundwork UK; Local government; Non-departmental public bodies; Voluntary organisations; Young people; Religion; Regional planning and development; Unemployment; Social problems; Regional development agencies; Single regeneration budget; Housing action trusts; Estate Action; Environmental task forces; Inner Cities Religious Council; Local Investment Fund
Date
22 June 1998
Reference
314 c362-5W; 45852
House
House of Commons
What is the forecast level of local authority matching funding contribution required by the Department of the Environment in 1997-98 and the next two financial years to fund Estate Action schemes. - Will write when figures available.
What is the forecast level of local authority matching funding contribution required by the Department of the Environment in 1997-98 and the next two financial years to fund Estate Action schemes. - Will write when figures available.
Asked by
Baroness Armstrong of Hill Top
(Labour)
Answered by
Paul Beresford
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
17 February 1997
Answered on
17 February 1997
Ms Armstrong: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what is the forecast level of local authority matching funding
contribution required by the Department of the Environemnt in 1997-98 and the next two financial years to fund estate action
schemes. [15888]
Sir Paul Beresford: The phasing of estate action grant by scheme in 1997-98 and the next two years--and hence the phasing of local
authorities' required contributions to schemes--is currently being finalised. I will write to the hon. Member as soon as the
requested figures are available.
Subjects
Finance; Estate Action
Date
17 February 1997
Reference
15888; 290 c418-9W
House
House of Commons
Deposited by
Department of the Environment
Type
Deposited papers
Author
Department of the Environment
Committed on
11 February 1997
Originated on
10 February 1997
Received on
11 February 1997
Subjects
Housing; Investment; Housing estates; Local government; Public sector; Housing investment programme; Estate Action
Commons Library location
Dep/3 4594
Lords Library location
HINF 97/188
Date
11 February 1997
Reference
Dep/3 4594
House
House of Commons
If he will publish for each local authority in England the total sums allocated for social housing investment in 1997-98 under (a) the Housing Corporation's Approved Development Plan, (b) local authority basic credit approvals, (c) local authority specific capital grants, (d) Estate Action and (e) other programmes. - Inc fact...
If he will publish for each local authority in England the total sums allocated for social housing investment in 1997-98 under (a) the Housing Corporation's Approved Development Plan, (b) local authority basic credit approvals, (c) local authority specific capital grants, (d) Estate Action and (e) other programmes. - Inc fact...
Asked by
Nick Raynsford
(Labour)
Answered by
David Curry
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
10 February 1997
Answered on
10 February 1997
Mr. Raynsford: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish for each local authority in England the total
sums allocated for social housing investment in 1997-98 under (a) the Housing Corporation's approved development plan, (b) local
authority basic credit approvals, (c) local authority specific capital grants, (d) estate action and (e) other programmes. [13788]
Mr. Curry: I have arranged for a table giving the data requested on authorities' approved development programme, housing investment
programme and estate action allocations for 1997-98 to be placed in the Library. The table also includes provisional 1997-98
allocations for Capital Challenge for investment in authorities own stock, housing action trusts and the 1997-98 allocations from
round 1 of the estates renewal challenge fund. Allocations for 1997-98 from the second round of the estates renewal challenge fund
and under the cash incentives scheme have not yet been finalised.
Some of the resources allocated through the single regeneration budget challenge fund and city challenge will be used for investment
in social housing but this element is not separately identified in the allocations made.
Subjects
Housing; Investment; Housing estates; Local government; Public sector; Housing investment programme; Estate Action
Date
10 February 1997
Reference
13788; 290 c79W
House
House of Commons
What allowance he made for inflation in determining estate action allocations in (a) 1993 and (b) 1994. - Inc no figs.
What allowance he made for inflation in determining estate action allocations in (a) 1993 and (b) 1994. - Inc no figs.
Asked by
John Austin
(Labour)
Answered by
Paul Beresford
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
12 December 1996
Answered on
12 December 1996
Mr. Austin-Walker: To ask the Secretary of state for the Environment what allowance he made for inflation in determining estate
action allocations in (a) 1993 and (b)
1994; and if he will make statement. [8850]
Sir Paul Beresford: Local authorities were advised to make due allowance for inflation before submitting their bids for estate
action support to the Department. The amounts available to fund new and continuing estate action schemes in 1993-94 and 1994-95 were
determined by the public expenditure survey settlements.
Subjects
Finance; Housing improvement; Housing estates; Inflation; Single regeneration budget; Estate Action
Date
12 December 1996
Reference
8850; 287 c306W
House
House of Commons
What is the level of continuation funding in (a) 1997-98, (b) 1998-99 and (c) 1999-2000 for each estate action scheme (i) in London and (ii) nationally. - Inc table of national figs.
What is the level of continuation funding in (a) 1997-98, (b) 1998-99 and (c) 1999-2000 for each estate action scheme (i) in London and (ii) nationally. - Inc table of national figs.
Asked by
John Austin
(Labour)
Answered by
Paul Beresford
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
12 December 1996
Answered on
12 December 1996
Mr. Austin-Walker: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what is the level of continuation funding in (a) 1997-98, (b)
1998-99 and (c) 1999- 2000 for each estate action scheme (i) in London and (ii) nationally. [8849]
Sir Paul Beresford: Within the single regeneration budget planned provision nationally for the remaining estate action commitments
is currently as follows:
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
£ million
1997-98 170
1998-99 98
1999-2000 61
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
SRB allocations to each region for 1997-98 for continuing programmes, including estate action, will be determined shortly, following
last month's Budget statement. The Government offices in each region then manage their total SRB allocation and have flexibility to
vire between programmes where necessary, in order to ensure that all existing estate action commitments continue to be honoured.
Regional SRB allocations for subsequent years will be determined by the outcome of future public expenditure surveys.
Subjects
Finance; Greater London; Housing improvement; Housing estates; Single regeneration budget; Estate Action
Date
12 December 1996
Reference
8849; 287 c305-6W
House
House of Commons
How much Leicester City Council has received towards home improvements for each year since 1986; and how much their bid for each year was since 1986. - Inc table. (Printed in daily part without ministers name)
How much Leicester City Council has received towards home improvements for each year since 1986; and how much their bid for each year was since 1986. - Inc table. (Printed in daily part without ministers name)
Asked by
Keith Vaz
(Labour)
Answered by
James Clappison
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
21 March 1996
Answered on
21 March 1996
Mr. Vaz: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment how much Leicester city council has received towards home improvements
for each year since 1986; and how much their bid for each year was since 1986.[22068]
£ million
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
HIP received HIP bid
1986-87 13.375 47.735
1987-88 12.909 52.091
1988-89 12.407 57.369
1989-90 9.165 62.037
1990-91 18.320 54.392
1991-92 18.300 54.035
1992-93 19.830 49.416
1993-94 21.545 29.393
1994-95 14.998 22.500
1995-96 9.345 17.400
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
In addition, the City has benefited from the following additional resources to improve housing stock under the following three
programmes:
The estate action programme
1986-87: £0.226 million
1987-88: £0.650 million
1988-89: £1.979 million
1989-90: £2.549 million
1990-91: £1.773 million
1991-92: £3.455 million
1992-93: £2.779 million
1993-94: £1.257 million
1994-95: £2.599 million
1995-96: £5.309 million.
City challenge
1993-94: £1.608 million
1994-95: £0.836 million
1995-96: £0.897 million.
Housing association grant for new rehab units
1986-87: not available
1987-88: £6.062 million
1988-89: £5.809 million
1989-90: £2.713 million
1990-91: £1.512 million
1991-92: £2.348 million
1992-93: £4.362 million
1993-94: £5.078 million
1994-95: £4.051 million
1995-96: £2.051 million.
Information on how these resources relate to the bids for each of the three programmes is not readily available.
Subjects
Central government; Finance; Housing associations; Grants; Housing improvement; Leicester City Council; Local government; Urban areas; Estate Action
Date
21 March 1996
Reference
22068; 274 c271-2W
House
House of Commons
Deposited by
Department of the Environment
Type
Consultation papers;
Deposited papers
Author
Department of the Environment
Committed on
20 March 1996
Originated on
19 February 1996
Received on
20 March 1996
Subjects
Council housing; Housing improvement; Housing estates; Single regeneration budget; Housing investment programme; Estate Action
Commons Library location
Dep/3 3036
Lords Library location
HINF 96/432
Date
20 March 1996
Reference
Dep/3 3036
House
House of Commons
If he will list the Estate Action schemes in the city of Newcastle and in the case of each show the (a) numbers of dwelling units (i) cleared, (ii) improved and (iii) built and (b) numbers of dwelling units transferred from the ownership of Newcastle upon Tyne City Council to...
If he will list the Estate Action schemes in the city of Newcastle and in the case of each show the (a) numbers of dwelling units (i) cleared, (ii) improved and (iii) built and (b) numbers of dwelling units transferred from the ownership of Newcastle upon Tyne City Council to...
Asked by
Jim Cousins
(Labour)
Answered by
Paul Beresford
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
21 February 1996
Answered on
21 February 1996
Subjects
Council housing; Housing associations; Housing improvement; Housing estates; Newcastle upon Tyne; Estate Action
Date
21 February 1996
Reference
16095; 272 c150-2W;272 c134-6W
House
House of Commons
What resources to date have been applied by his Department to (a) the Cowgate Estate Action scheme, Newcastle, (b) Y. V. Lovell plc, (c) North British Housing, (d) other housing associations in the area and (e) the City of Newcastle upon Tyne. - Inc figs.
What resources to date have been applied by his Department to (a) the Cowgate Estate Action scheme, Newcastle, (b) Y. V. Lovell plc, (c) North British Housing, (d) other housing associations in the area and (e) the City of Newcastle upon Tyne. - Inc figs.
Asked by
Jim Cousins
(Labour)
Answered by
Paul Beresford
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
21 February 1996
Answered on
21 February 1996
Subjects
Housing associations; Housing improvement; Housing estates; Newcastle upon Tyne; Housing investment programme; Estate Action; Anchor Trust; North British Housing; YJ Lovell
Date
21 February 1996
Reference
16084; 272 c150W;272 c134W
House
House of Commons
Deposited by
Department of the Environment
Type
Consultation papers;
Deposited papers
Author
Department of the Environment
Committed on
25 January 1996
Originated on
23 January 1996
Received on
25 January 1996
Subjects
Council housing; Housing improvement; Housing estates; Single regeneration budget; Housing investment programme; Estate Action
Commons Library location
Dep/3 2682
Lords Library location
HINF 96/120
Date
25 January 1996
Reference
Dep/3 2682
House
House of Commons
Statement on what action he intends to take to help leaseholders of local authorities facing bills for estate action repairs and improvements where these costs are also met by government-funded schemes. - Inc ref to "Leaseholders of local authorities, housing action trusts, urban development corporations, registered housing associations and other...
Statement on what action he intends to take to help leaseholders of local authorities facing bills for estate action repairs and improvements where these costs are also met by government-funded schemes. - Inc ref to "Leaseholders of local authorities, housing action trusts, urban development corporations, registered housing associations and other...
Asked by
Lord Carrington of Fulham
(Conservative)
Answered by
James Clappison
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
23 January 1996
Answered on
23 January 1996
Subjects
Buildings; Housing; Fees and charges; Housing improvement; Landlord and tenant; Public sector; Social rented housing; Repairs and maintenance; Estate Action
Date
23 January 1996
Reference
11822; 270 c206W
House
House of Commons
How much in total will be available for investment in the renovation of local authority housing from (a) credit approvals, (b) Estate Action and the Single Regeneration Budget and (c) capital receipts in 1996-97; and what the equivalent figures were for 1989-90 and 1993-94. (Failed OPQ). - Inc figures for...
How much in total will be available for investment in the renovation of local authority housing from (a) credit approvals, (b) Estate Action and the Single Regeneration Budget and (c) capital receipts in 1996-97; and what the equivalent figures were for 1989-90 and 1993-94. (Failed OPQ). - Inc figures for...
Asked by
Lord Janner of Braunstone
(Labour)
Answered by
David Curry
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
19 December 1995
Answered on
19 December 1995
Subjects
Council housing; Housing improvement; Income; Local government; Local government finance; Single regeneration budget; Housing investment programme; Estate Action
Date
19 December 1995
Reference
4902; 268 c1098W;268 c1096W
House
House of Commons
Answered by
David Curry
(Conservative)
Asked by
Peter L Pike
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Oral answers to questions
What have been the financial implications for improvement of council house estates by the move from estate action funding to the single regeneration budget scheme. - Including figures. -
Subjects
Council housing; Housing improvement; Housing estates; Single regeneration budget; Housing investment programme; Estate Action
Date
19 April 1995
Reference
258 c201-2
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
David Curry
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Council housing; Housing improvement; Housing estates; Single regeneration budget; Housing investment programme; Estate Action
Date
19 April 1995
Reference
258 c201-2
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
What have been the financial implications for improvement of council house estates by the move from estate action funding to the single regeneration budget scheme. - Including figures. -
What have been the financial implications for improvement of council house estates by the move from estate action funding to the single regeneration budget scheme. - Including figures. -
Asked by
Peter L Pike
(Labour)
Answered by
David Curry
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
19 April 1995
Answered on
19 April 1995
Subjects
Council housing; Housing improvement; Housing estates; Single regeneration budget; Housing investment programme; Estate Action
Date
19 April 1995
Reference
258 c201-2
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons