1-20 of 226 results for subject:"Family intervention projects"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.253 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.002 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Family intervention projects"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Family intervention projects" OR subject_t:FIPs OR subject_ses:10227
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much funding his Department provided to family intervention projects in each of the last five years.
[119376]
To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much funding his Department provided to family intervention projects in each of the last five years.
[119376]
I have been asked to reply on behalf of the Department for Education.
The Government allocated some £9.0 million in 2007-08, £11.2 million in 2008-09, £33.6 million in 2009-10, £49.78 million in 2010-11 and £46 million in 2011-12 for family intervention projects/services. The ring fence for this funding was removed in May 2010. From April 2011 the Early Intervention Grant of £2212 million (2011-12) and £2297 million (2012-13) was allocated to local authorities in England. This can fund universal programmes and activities available to ail children, young people and families as well as specialist services where intensive support is needed.
To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what estimate he has made of the change in spending on family intervention programmes in each local authority area since May 2010.
[128770]
To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what estimate he has made of the change in spending on family intervention programmes in each local authority area since May 2010.
[128770]
The Government do not require local authorities to report expenditure on family intervention projects or comparable services.
By June 2012, all upper-tier local authorities in England had signed up to the Troubled Families programme, committing to turn around an agreed number of families in their area. The Government will contribute up to £4,000 per family towards the cost of successfully intervening with eligible families across England.
The Government are not instructing local authorities to do this work in a particular way, but it expects there to be an increase in the use of family intervention work, which has been shown to deliver results
To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many families were helped by family intervention projects partly or fully funded by the Government over the last five years.
[124442]
To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many families were helped by family intervention projects partly or fully funded by the Government over the last five years.
[124442]
I refer the hon. Member to my answer of 17 October 2012, Official Report, column 302W.
To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many troubled families were helped by family intervention projects in each of the last five years in England and Wales.
[119340]
To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many troubled families were helped by family intervention projects in each of the last five years in England and Wales.
[119340]
[holding answer 5 September 2012]: Families supported by family intervention projects over the last five years are not necessarily troubled families, which were defined for the purposes of the national Troubled Families programme in March 2012.
I would have thought the hon. Lady would have been a little bit more jolly, considering that I congratulated her on the great work that she has been doing on behalf of the Government.
I am very surprised at the hon. Lady, because we would not have been able to help troubled families without the intensive help of Labour councils. The big difference between what we are doing now and what she suggests is that we are allowing councils to come up with their own schemes and methodologies. All that we
are interested in is the outputs. Frankly, she should congratulate all those who have worked hard, because we can now identify the correct families, three months ahead of when people expected us to be able to do so.
I would have thought the hon. Lady would have been a little bit more jolly, considering that I congratulated her on the great work that she has been doing on behalf of the Government.
I am very surprised at the hon. Lady, because we would not have been able to help troubled families without the intensive help of Labour councils. The big difference between what we are doing now and what she suggests is that we are allowing councils to come up with their own schemes and methodologies. All that we
are interested in is the outputs. Frankly, she should congratulate all those who have worked hard, because we can now identify the correct families, three months ahead of when people expected us to be able to do so.
Properly targeted and funded family intervention works, so why have the Government introduced a half-baked scheme based on research that fails to distinguish between poor families and those involved in antisocial behaviour? Why do they refuse to give details of their cost estimates on the spurious grounds that the spending of public money is commercially sensitive? Is it not because they want to disguise the fact that they have slashed services such as Sure Start and youth intervention programmes, which really make a difference, and the fact that councils will get back only a tiny fraction of the millions that they have already lost?
I am delighted to report that all 152 principal local authorities signed up last month. I am also delighted at the amount of progress being made and delighted that at least some Opposition Members have been more than helpful. It is our first big chance to do something about this serious situation.
I am delighted to report that all 152 principal local authorities signed up last month. I am also delighted at the amount of progress being made and delighted that at least some Opposition Members have been more than helpful. It is our first big chance to do something about this serious situation.
Are the Government’s excellent proposals for troubled families being embraced by local authorities throughout the country?
Are the Government’s excellent proposals for troubled families being embraced by local authorities throughout the country?
Are the Government’s excellent proposals for troubled families being embraced by local authorities throughout the country?
I am delighted to report that all 152 principal local authorities signed up last month. I am also delighted at the amount of progress being made and delighted that at least some Opposition Members have been more than helpful. It is our first big chance to do something about this serious situation.
Properly targeted and funded family intervention works, so why have the Government introduced a half-baked scheme based on research that fails to distinguish between poor families and those involved in antisocial behaviour? Why do they refuse to give details of their cost estimates on the spurious grounds that the spending of public money is commercially sensitive? Is it not because they want to disguise the fact that they have slashed services such as Sure Start and youth intervention programmes, which really make a difference, and the fact that councils will get back only a tiny fraction of the millions that they have already lost?
Properly targeted and funded family intervention works, so why have the Government introduced a half-baked scheme based on research that fails to distinguish between poor families and those involved in antisocial behaviour? Why do they refuse to give details of their cost estimates on the spurious grounds that the spending of public money is commercially sensitive? Is it not because they want to disguise the fact that they have slashed services such as Sure Start and youth intervention programmes, which really make a difference, and the fact that councils will get back only a tiny fraction of the millions that they have already lost?
I would have thought the hon. Lady would have been a little bit more jolly, considering that I congratulated her on the great work that she has been doing on behalf of the Government.
I am very surprised at the hon. Lady, because we would not have been able to help troubled families without the intensive help of Labour councils. The big difference between what we are doing now and what she suggests is that we are allowing councils to come up with their own schemes and methodologies. All that we
are interested in is the outputs. Frankly, she should congratulate all those who have worked hard, because we can now identify the correct families, three months ahead of when people expected us to be able to do so.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many families have been visited by a (a) family nurse partnership and (b) family intervention project in (i) the last three years and (ii) the latest period for which figures are available.
[114287]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many families have been visited by a (a) family nurse partnership and (b) family intervention project in (i) the last three years and (ii) the latest period for which figures are available.
[114287]
Since its inception in 2007 up until the end of March 2012, 9,207 families have been enrolled on the Family Nurse Partnership programme in England.
Family nurses visit families from early in pregnancy until their infant reaches two years of age and in 2011-12, 6,651 families were visited by a family nurse. In 2010-11 family nurses visited 5,608 families and in 2009-10, 3,854 families.
Family intervention projects are a matter for the Department for Communities and Local Government.
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what proportion of the funding allocated to the family intervention programme for families with multiple problems will be allocated to the Scottish government under the Barnett formula.
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what proportion of the funding allocated to the family intervention programme for families with multiple problems will be allocated to the Scottish government under the Barnett formula.
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland whether he has had discussions with (a) the Prime Minister and (b) other Government ministers on the formulation of the family intervention programme for families with multiple problems.
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland whether he has had discussions with (a) the Prime Minister and (b) other Government ministers on the formulation of the family intervention programme for families with multiple problems.
(3) how many families with multiple problems living in Scotland he expects to be requested to participate in a family-intervention programme.
(3) how many families with multiple problems living in Scotland he expects to be requested to participate in a family-intervention programme.
(2) what discussions he has had with (a) the Secretary of State for Scotland, (b) the Scottish Executive and (c) Convention of Scottish Local Authorities on the implementation of the family intervention programme for families suffering from multiple problems;
(2) what discussions he has had with (a) the Secretary of State for Scotland, (b) the Scottish Executive and (c) Convention of Scottish Local Authorities on the implementation of the family intervention programme for families suffering from multiple problems;
To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (1) how much funding will be allocated to the family intervention programme in respect of families with multiple problems living in Scotland;
To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (1) how much funding will be allocated to the family intervention programme in respect of families with multiple problems living in Scotland;
To ask the Secretary of State for Education how many staff were employed in each Family Intervention Project in each year since the establishment of the projects.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education how many staff were employed in each Family Intervention Project in each year since the establishment of the projects.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education how many families received an intervention through family intervention projects in each of the last four financial years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education how many families received an intervention through family intervention projects in each of the last four financial years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education how much funding was allocated to family intervention projects in (a) 2007-08, (b) 2008-09, (c) 2009-10, (d) 2010-11 and (e) 2011-12.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education how much funding was allocated to family intervention projects in (a) 2007-08, (b) 2008-09, (c) 2009-10, (d) 2010-11 and (e) 2011-12.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education how many families have received assistance from family intervention projects in 2010-11 to date; and what estimate he has made of the number to receive such assistance in (a) 2011-12, (b) 2012-13 and (c) 2013-14.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education how many families have received assistance from family intervention projects in 2010-11 to date; and what estimate he has made of the number to receive such assistance in (a) 2011-12, (b) 2012-13 and (c) 2013-14.