1-20 of 2,950 results for subject:"Financial Services Compensation Scheme"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 2.069 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.008 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Financial Services Compensation Scheme"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Financial Services Compensation Scheme" OR subject_t:FSCS OR subject_ses:34312
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
More
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask His Majesty's Government whether the Financial Services Compensation Scheme is underwritten by any public body or Government department.
To ask His Majesty's Government whether the Financial Services Compensation Scheme is underwritten by any public body or Government department.
The Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) funds its compensation costs through levies on the financial services sector and recoveries against firms that have failed. As FSCS levies industry following payment of compensation or securing continuity for policyholders, it has the ability to borrow privately from a £3 billion revolving credit facility to meet short-term funding needs, with any lending repaid through levies. As a last resort, it can also request to borrow from HM Treasury, with any government borrowing also repaid through levies. This means that, even in the event of last-resort public financial support, the financial services sector will fund FSCS’s costs through a levy alongside recoveries.
Under rules set by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), eligible life insurance policyholders – including customers of life annuity and bulk purchase annuity contracts – are 100% protected by the FSCS for any claims against an authorised insurer in the event that it fails. For a life insurance failure, levies would be payable by other life insurance and pensions providers.
The PRA sets the rules for policyholder protection including the FSCS funding of insurance compensation, including long-term insurance such as annuities. In doing so, it has rules in place to ensure FSCS can safely levy the insurance sector and meet its costs. The FSCS also closely monitors and regularly forecasts potential claims and compensation costs to ensure it can meet these within its available financial means. The PRA also conducts stress tests of life insurers, most recently in 2025.
Finally, FSCS also maintains contingency plans for a potential life insurance failure. These plans are subject to independent assurance through FSCS's assurance framework and are designed to support an effective and coordinated response, including engagement with regulators, firms and other stakeholders.
To ask His Majesty's Government whether the Financial Services Compensation Scheme would pay out 100 per cent of all life annuity or bulk purchase annuity contracts, in the event that the annuity company or its underwriters or reinsurers were to fail and become unable to do so.
To ask His Majesty's Government whether the Financial Services Compensation Scheme would pay out 100 per cent of all life annuity or bulk purchase annuity contracts, in the event that the annuity company or its underwriters or reinsurers were to fail and become unable to do so.
The Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) funds its compensation costs through levies on the financial services sector and recoveries against firms that have failed. As FSCS levies industry following payment of compensation or securing continuity for policyholders, it has the ability to borrow privately from a £3 billion revolving credit facility to meet short-term funding needs, with any lending repaid through levies. As a last resort, it can also request to borrow from HM Treasury, with any government borrowing also repaid through levies. This means that, even in the event of last-resort public financial support, the financial services sector will fund FSCS’s costs through a levy alongside recoveries.
Under rules set by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), eligible life insurance policyholders – including customers of life annuity and bulk purchase annuity contracts – are 100% protected by the FSCS for any claims against an authorised insurer in the event that it fails. For a life insurance failure, levies would be payable by other life insurance and pensions providers.
The PRA sets the rules for policyholder protection including the FSCS funding of insurance compensation, including long-term insurance such as annuities. In doing so, it has rules in place to ensure FSCS can safely levy the insurance sector and meet its costs. The FSCS also closely monitors and regularly forecasts potential claims and compensation costs to ensure it can meet these within its available financial means. The PRA also conducts stress tests of life insurers, most recently in 2025.
Finally, FSCS also maintains contingency plans for a potential life insurance failure. These plans are subject to independent assurance through FSCS's assurance framework and are designed to support an effective and coordinated response, including engagement with regulators, firms and other stakeholders.
To ask His Majesty's Government what risk analysis have they conducted, or asked regulators to conduct, to stress-test the payments currently expected from the Financial Services Compensation Scheme, should one or more underwriter, reinsurer or supplier of life annuities or bulk purchase annuities become insolvent and be unable to meet...
To ask His Majesty's Government what risk analysis have they conducted, or asked regulators to conduct, to stress-test the payments currently expected from the Financial Services Compensation Scheme, should one or more underwriter, reinsurer or supplier of life annuities or bulk purchase annuities become insolvent and be unable to meet...
The Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) funds its compensation costs through levies on the financial services sector and recoveries against firms that have failed. As FSCS levies industry following payment of compensation or securing continuity for policyholders, it has the ability to borrow privately from a £3 billion revolving credit facility to meet short-term funding needs, with any lending repaid through levies. As a last resort, it can also request to borrow from HM Treasury, with any government borrowing also repaid through levies. This means that, even in the event of last-resort public financial support, the financial services sector will fund FSCS’s costs through a levy alongside recoveries.
Under rules set by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), eligible life insurance policyholders – including customers of life annuity and bulk purchase annuity contracts – are 100% protected by the FSCS for any claims against an authorised insurer in the event that it fails. For a life insurance failure, levies would be payable by other life insurance and pensions providers.
The PRA sets the rules for policyholder protection including the FSCS funding of insurance compensation, including long-term insurance such as annuities. In doing so, it has rules in place to ensure FSCS can safely levy the insurance sector and meet its costs. The FSCS also closely monitors and regularly forecasts potential claims and compensation costs to ensure it can meet these within its available financial means. The PRA also conducts stress tests of life insurers, most recently in 2025.
Finally, FSCS also maintains contingency plans for a potential life insurance failure. These plans are subject to independent assurance through FSCS's assurance framework and are designed to support an effective and coordinated response, including engagement with regulators, firms and other stakeholders.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether consumers that purchase pre-paid funeral services from a Local Authority are able to (i) access the Financial Services Compensation Scheme and (ii) make a complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether consumers that purchase pre-paid funeral services from a Local Authority are able to (i) access the Financial Services Compensation Scheme and (ii) make a complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service.
The Government legislated in 2021 to bring pre-paid funeral plan providers and intermediaries within the regulatory remit of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). This made it illegal for firms to sell pre-paid funeral plans without authorisation from the FCA, protecting 1.6 million customers and their families.
In the preceding public consultation in 2019, the Government stated it had not seen evidence that plans offered by local authorities required regulation from a conduct or prudential perspective. The Government therefore proposed that local authorities should be excluded from FCA regulation, and this position was maintained in the consultation response published in March 2020. The Government is committed to regulating only where there is a clear case for doing so.
Pre-paid funeral plans bought from local authorities fall outside the remit of the Financial Services Compensation Scheme or the Financial Ombudsman Service. Residents who are unhappy with the service they have received can raise a complaint directly with their local authority. Where a complaint remains unresolved, residents in England can submit a complaint to the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman.
Frequently asked questions (FAQs) about occupational and personal pensions
Frequently asked questions (FAQs) about occupational and personal pensions
Answers to frequently asked questions relating to banking, credit, mortgages, investments and financial service fraud.
Answers to frequently asked questions relating to banking, credit, mortgages, investments and financial service fraud.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if she will make an assessment of the potential merits of changing the terms of the Financial Services Compensation Scheme to reimburse legal costs for victims of fraud.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if she will make an assessment of the potential merits of changing the terms of the Financial Services Compensation Scheme to reimburse legal costs for victims of fraud.
The rules governing the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) for consumers of failed authorised firms, including where those consumers have been the victims of fraud, are set by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). They are set out in the PRA Rulebook and FCA Handbook within the framework set by Parliament. It is for the FSCS to assess individual claims and provide appropriate compensation in line with those rules and depending on the circumstances of the claim and the regulated activity involved.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what recent discussions she has had with the Prudential Regulation Authority on the potential merits of changes to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme deposit protection limit.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what recent discussions she has had with the Prudential Regulation Authority on the potential merits of changes to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme deposit protection limit.
Eligible deposits held by UK banks, building societies and credit unions that are authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) are protected by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme up to £85,000. The PRA sets this limit and is required to independently review the limit every five years.
On 31 March, the PRA launched a consultation on the outcome of its most recent review and proposed an inflation-based increase in this limit to £110,000. Any changes to the limit must be approved by the Treasury and the Government would carefully consider any changes proposed by the PRA following the conclusion of this consultation.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether her Department has made an assessment of the potential merits of increasing the the Financial Services Compensation Scheme deposit protection limit for registered businesses.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether her Department has made an assessment of the potential merits of increasing the the Financial Services Compensation Scheme deposit protection limit for registered businesses.
Eligible deposits held by UK banks, building societies and credit unions that are authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) are protected by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme up to £85,000. This limit is set by the PRA and applies to eligible retail accounts as well as accounts of eligible registered businesses. The PRA is required to independently review the limit every five years.
On 31 March, the PRA launched a consultation on the outcome of its most recent review and proposed an inflation-based increase in this limit to £110,000. Any changes to the limit must be approved by the Treasury and the Government would carefully consider any changes proposed by the PRA following the conclusion of this consultation.
Lords consideration of Commons amendments. Commons amendments 1 and 2 agreed to.
Lords consideration of Commons amendments. Commons amendments 1 and 2 agreed to.
Moved by
Lord Livermore
Moved by
Lord Livermore
My Lords, with the leave of the House, I will also speak to Amendment 2. I would like to thank noble Lords for their continued interest and engagement in this important legislation. I know that some noble Lords will be disappointed to see the other place
overturn the amendment inserted...
My Lords, with the leave of the House, I will also speak to Amendment 2. I would like to thank noble Lords for their continued interest and engagement in this important legislation. I know that some noble Lords will be disappointed to see the other place
overturn the amendment inserted...
My Lords, I want to ask the Minister a question that arises from this change. First, though, it is over six months since we debated these amendments. That does seem like an awfully long time for the Bill to disappear into limbo and come back, particularly when other Bills are...
My Lords, I want to ask the Minister a question that arises from this change. First, though, it is over six months since we debated these amendments. That does seem like an awfully long time for the Bill to disappear into limbo and come back, particularly when other Bills are...
My Lords, I have to say that I appreciate the explanation that we have just had from the Minister, but I and others remain disturbed by the Government’s decision not to accept the amendment, which was not just rational but well crafted, introduced by your Lordships in this House. The...
My Lords, I have to say that I appreciate the explanation that we have just had from the Minister, but I and others remain disturbed by the Government’s decision not to accept the amendment, which was not just rational but well crafted, introduced by your Lordships in this House. The...
My Lords, this is an important Bill, which provides the Bank of England with extra flexibility to manage bank failures, particularly those of smaller banks, in a way that strengthens protections for taxpayers. It reflects proposals by the last Government in the light of experience with the demise of Silicon...
My Lords, this is an important Bill, which provides the Bank of England with extra flexibility to manage bank failures, particularly those of smaller banks, in a way that strengthens protections for taxpayers. It reflects proposals by the last Government in the light of experience with the demise of Silicon...