Skip to main content

1-20 of 134 results for subject:"Foundation courses"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the role of the Foundation Diploma in Art and Design (FAD) as a pathway (1) into creative higher education, and (2) meeting the skills needs of the creative industries; and what assessment they have made of the impact of...

Asked by
Lord Isaac (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
HL1350
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee
Date
10 February 2026
Reference
HL 263 2024-26
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee for its scrutiny of these draft regulations. This statutory instrument, which was laid in draft on 20 January, increases the limits on tuition fees that higher education providers can charge students studying undergraduate courses at approved fee cap providers in the...

Member
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc8-17GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I very much welcome this measure. I should declare my interests as a visiting professor at King’s College London and a member of the University of Southampton’s council. I know from seeing universities close up that the situation is indeed serious, as the Minister rightly said. The freeze...

Member
Lord Willetts (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc9-18GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I also must declare an interest, as a member of the academic staff of King’s College London. I would also like to note that I was a member of the Augar review. Apropos of the suggestion by the noble Lord, Lord Willetts, of a quinquennial review, I am...

Member
Baroness Wolf of Dulwich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc11-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I also have to declare an interest as a visiting professor at King’s. I have other education-related entries on the register, which I will not list here.

I welcome the Government’s decision to allow the increase of fees in line with inflation. It is long overdue, and I wish...

Member
Lord Johnson of Marylebone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc12-20GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister is right to talk about financial sustainability. She is also right to talk about how we must value students. I remember quite clearly how the noble Lord, Lord Johnson, told us at every opportunity that we needed to increase tuition fees for the sake of the...

Member
Lord Storey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c21GC
House
House of Lords

Four.

Member
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c14GC
House
House of Lords

King’s is not yet, but will be.

Member
Lord Willetts (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c15GC
House
House of Lords

It always seemed to me that were almost gloating about this, but what a fine way to show that in the financing of our university sector, or in how we look after our students in many cases.

As I think has been said by the noble Lord, Lord Willetts, last year...

Member
Lord Storey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc15-22GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as we have heard, this statutory instrument increases by 3.1% the maximum tuition fees that higher education providers can charge for the majority of courses and, in turn, the amount of tuition fee loans that students can take out. It also reduces the maximum amount of tuition fees...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc22-17GC
House
House of Lords

I thank noble Lords for their contributions to this debate. It should perhaps have been sponsored by King’s College; there was clear quality from King’s on display in the quality of the contributions made. I will endeavour to answer noble Lords’ questions but, before I turn to those questions, I...

Member
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc18-27GC
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Smith of Malvern
Answering member
Baroness Barran
Department
Department for Education
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc7-21GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think we have all agreed that the Bill is tinkering with what is essentially a broken system. The Labour Party clearly knew that because it pledged in its manifesto to reform the system, so it understands that the system is broken. Speaking to the last group, the...

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2025
Reference
843 cc536-7GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Scott of Bybrook

46: After Clause 4, insert the following new Clause—

“Review of impact on businesses, high streets and economic growth

(1) The Secretary of State must review the impact of sections 1 to 4 of this Act on—

(a) businesses,

(b) high streets, and

(c) economic growth.

(2) The review must consider—

(a) the...

Member
Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2025
Reference
843 c529GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Amendment 46 I will also speak to my Amendments 53 and 54, which are all borne from the lack of detail in the Bill and the failure to publish an impact assessment for its first four clauses. The Government are asking us to agree to a...

Member
Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2025
Reference
843 cc529-530GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as we have heard from the noble Baroness, Lady Scott, this group is about understanding the impact of the Bill. To help us focus on why this is important, my noble friend Lady Pinnock and I have produced our own notional one-dimensional impact assessment.

If a property had a...

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2025
Reference
843 cc530-1GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will add a few words on this important group of amendments. It is not possible to do an impact assessment at the moment. This has been rushed, and the new valuation list will not be completed for another three or four months. Non-domestic rates are the third-highest...

Member
Lord Thurlow (Crossbench; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2025
Reference
843 cc531-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, these amendments seek to introduce a number of provisions into the Bill requiring reports and assessments of various types. They are concerned with the impact on the RHL—retail, hospitality and leisure—sector, including on local government revenues, businesses more generally and economic growth. Some reports and assessments would be...

Member
Lord Khan of Burnley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2025
Reference
843 cc532-4GC
House
House of Lords

Before the Minister sits down, could I point out that these forecasts are all going to be hypothetical? In five months’ time, the VOA will produce, or have access to, the updated new rateable values nationwide. Current rateable values will be history. Therefore, we have to anticipate what those might...

Member
Lord Thurlow (Crossbench; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2025
Reference
843 c534GC
House
House of Lords