1-20 of 67 results for subject:"Gating orders"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.252 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.002 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Gating orders"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Gating orders" OR subject_ses:10415
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) what discussions her Department has had with the emergency services on the proposed changes to gating orders in the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill;
[159018]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) what discussions her Department has had with the emergency services on the proposed changes to gating orders in the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill;
[159018]
In our 2011 public consultation, we sought views on the proposed rationalisation of powers to deal with antisocial behaviour. This included replacing gating orders with a new community protection order. We received over a thousand responses, including from numerous police forces and ‘Ramblers’, Britain's walking charity.
In addition, we published draft legislation in December 2012 so that it could undergo pre-legislative scrutiny by the Home Affairs Select Committee, This included a further opportunity to comment, this time on the detailed proposals. Again, a number of police forces responded to this, as did the ‘Ramblers and Open Spaces Society’.
We have considered these responses in developing our proposals and will continue to engage with interested groups and individuals over the coming year as the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill makes its way through Parliament.
(2) what consultation her Department has had with (a) local access forums and (b) Rambler associations on the proposed changes to gating orders in the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill.
[159019]
Chris Ruane:
(2) what consultation her Department has had with (a) local access forums and (b) Rambler associations on the proposed changes to gating orders in the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill.
[159019]
Chris Ruane:
In our 2011 public consultation, we sought views on the proposed rationalisation of powers to deal with antisocial behaviour. This included replacing gating orders with a new community protection order. We received over a thousand responses, including from numerous police forces and ‘Ramblers’, Britain's walking charity.
In addition, we published draft legislation in December 2012 so that it could undergo pre-legislative scrutiny by the Home Affairs Select Committee, This included a further opportunity to comment, this time on the detailed proposals. Again, a number of police forces responded to this, as did the ‘Ramblers and Open Spaces Society’.
We have considered these responses in developing our proposals and will continue to engage with interested groups and individuals over the coming year as the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill makes its way through Parliament.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many gating orders were issued by local authorities in (a) England and Wales, (b) Nottinghamshire and (c) Ashfield constituency in the last three years.
[114789]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many gating orders were issued by local authorities in (a) England and Wales, (b) Nottinghamshire and (c) Ashfield constituency in the last three years.
[114789]
The Home Office does not hold the information requested.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) gating orders have been made under the provision of section 129A of the Highways Act 1980 and (b) public inquiries have been held into proposed gating orders when objections have been received from members of the public.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) gating orders have been made under the provision of section 129A of the Highways Act 1980 and (b) public inquiries have been held into proposed gating orders when objections have been received from members of the public.
Table showing number of gating orders since April 2006, broken down by local authority. 7 p.
Table showing number of gating orders since April 2006, broken down by local authority. 7 p.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many gating orders under the Highways Act 1980 were (a) applied for and (b) granted in each local authority area in England in each year since 2001.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many gating orders under the Highways Act 1980 were (a) applied for and (b) granted in each local authority area in England in each year since 2001.
| Local authority | Number of gating orders |
| Ardur DC | — |
| Allerdale BC | — |
| Alnwick BC | — |
| Amber Valley BC | 0 |
| Arun DC | 0 |
| Ashfield DC | 0 |
| Ashford BC | — |
| Aylesbury Vale DC | 0 |
| Babergh DC | 0 |
| Barnsley MBC | 0 |
| Barrow in Furness BC | — |
| Basildon DC | 0 |
| Basingstoke and Deane BC | — |
| Bassetlaw DC | — |
| Bath and N E Somerset | 0 |
| Bedford BC | 0 |
| Berwick-upon-Tweed BC | 0 |
| Birmingham CC | — |
| Blaby DC | 0 |
| Blackburn and Darwen BC | — |
| Blackpool BC | 0 |
| Blyth Valley BC | — |
| Bolsover DC | — |
| Bolton MBC | 0 |
| Boston BC | 0 |
| Bournemouth BC | — |
| Bracknell Forest BC | — |
| Bradford MDC | — |
| Braintree DC | — |
| Breckland DC | 0 |
| Brentwood BC | 0 |
| Bridgnorth DC | 0 |
| Brighton and Hove BC | — |
| Bristol CC | — |
| Broadland DC | 0 |
| Bromsgrove DC | 0 |
| Broxbourne BC | — |
| Broxtowe DC | 0 |
| Burnley BC | — |
| Bury BC | 0 |
| Calderdale BC | — |
| Cambridge CC | — |
| Cannock Chase DC | 0 |
| Canterbury CC | 0 |
| Caradon CC | 0 |
| Carlisle CC | — |
| Carrick CC | — |
| Castle Morpeth BC | 0 |
| Castle Point DC | 0 |
| Charnwood BC | — |
| Chelmsford BC | — |
| Cheltenham BC | — |
| Cherwell DC | 0 |
| Chester CC | 0 |
| Chester-le-Street DC | 0 |
| Chesterfield BC | 0 |
| Chichester DC | 0 |
| Chiltern DC | 0 |
| Chorley BC | 0 |
| Christchurch BC | 0 |
| Colchester BC | — |
| Congleton BC | 0 |
| Copeland BC | — |
| Corby DC | — |
| Cotswold DC | — |
| Coventry CC | 2 |
| Craven DC | 0 |
| Crawley BC | 0 |
| Crewe and Nantwich BC | — |
| Dacorum BC | 0 |
| Darlington BC | — |
| Dartford BC | 0 |
| Daventry DC | 0 |
| Derby CC | 0 |
| Derbyshire Dales DC | 0 |
| Derwentside DC | — |
| Doncaster DC | — |
| Dover DC | 0 |
| Dudley DC | — |
| Durham City Council | 0 |
| E Cambridgeshire DC | — |
| E Devon DC | 0 |
| E Dorset DC | 0 |
| E Hampshire DC | 0 |
| E Hertfordshire DC | 0 |
| E Lindsey DC | — |
| E Northamptonshire DC | — |
| E Riding of Yorkshire DC | 0 |
| E Staffordshire BC | — |
| Easington DC | 0 |
| Eastbourne BC | — |
| Eastleigh BC | 0 |
| Eden | 0 |
| Ellesmere Port and Neston | 0 |
| Elmbridge BC | 0 |
| Epping Forest DC | 0 |
| Epsom and Ewell BC | 0 |
| Erewash BC | 0 |
| Exeter CC | — |
| Fareham | 0 |
| Fenland DC | 0 |
| Forest Heath DC | 0 |
| Forest of Dean DC | — |
| Fylde BC | 0 |
| Gateshead BC | 0 |
| Gedling DC | — |
| Gloucester CC | — |
| Gosport BC | — |
| Gravesham BC | — |
| Great Yarmouth BC | 0 |
| Guildford BC | — |
| Halton BC | 0 |
| Hambleton DC | 0 |
| Harborough DC | 0 |
| Harlow DC | — |
| Harrogate BC | — |
| Hart DC | — |
| Hartlepool BC | — |
| Hastings BC | 0 |
| Havant BC | 0 |
| Herefordshire DC | 0 |
| Hertsmere BC | 0 |
| High Peak BC | 0 |
| Hinckley and Bosworth BC | 0 |
| Horsham DC | 0 |
| Huntingdonshire DC | 0 |
| Hyndburn BC | 0 |
| Ipswich BC | 0 |
| Isle of Wight DC | 0 |
| Isles of Scilly DC | 0 |
| Kennet DC | 0 |
| Kerrier DC | 0 |
| Kettering BC | 0 |
| Kings Lynn and W Norfolk DC | — |
| Kingston upon Hull City Council | — |
| Kirklees BC | 0 |
| Knowsley BC | — |
| Lancaster CC | 0 |
| LB Corporation of London | — |
| LB Barking and Dagenham | 1 |
| LB Barnet | 0 |
| LB Bexley | — |
| LB Brent | — |
| LB Bromley | — |
| LB Camden | 0 |
| LB Croydon | — |
| LB Ealing | — |
| LB Enfield | — |
| LB Greenwich | 0 |
| LB Hackney | 0 |
| LB Hammersmith and Fulham | — |
| LB Haringey | 2 |
| LB Harrow | 0 |
| LB Havering | 0 |
| LB Hillingdon | 0 |
| LB Hounslow | 0 |
| LB Islington | — |
| LB of Kensington and Chelsea | 0 |
| LB of Kingston upon Thames | — |
| LB Lambeth | 0 |
| LB Lewisham | — |
| LB Merton | — |
| LB Newham | — |
| LB Redbridge | — |
| LB Richmond upon Thames | — |
| LB Sutton | — |
| LB Southwark | — |
| LB Tower Hamlets | 0 |
| LB Waltham Forest | 0 |
| LB Wandsworth | 0 |
| Leeds CC | 7 |
| Leicester City | — |
| Lewes DC | — |
| Lichfield DC | 0 |
| Lincoln CC | — |
| Liverpool CC | — |
| Luton BC | 0 |
| Macclesfield BC | — |
| Maidstone BC | — |
| Maldon DC | 0 |
| Malvern Hills DC | 0 |
| Manchester CC | — |
| Mansfield DC | — |
| Medway TC | 1 |
| Melton BC | — |
| Mendip DC | 0 |
| Mid Bedfordshire DC | 0 |
| Mid Devon DC | — |
| Mid Suffolk DC | 0 |
| Mid Sussex DC | — |
| Middlesbrough CC | 0 |
| Milton Keynes BC | — |
| Mole Valley DC | 0 |
| N Cornwall DC | 0 |
| N Devon DC | 0 |
| N Dorset DC | 0 |
| N Hertfordshire DC | 0 |
| N Kesteven DC | 0 |
| N Lincolnshire DC | 10 |
| Norfolk DC | 0 |
| N Shropshire DC | 0 |
| N Somerset DC | — |
| N Tyneside BC | — |
| N Wiltshire DC | — |
| N York Moors Park Authority | — |
| N E Derbyshire DC | 0 |
| N E Lincolnshire DC | — |
| N W Leicestershire DC | 0 |
| N Warwickshire BC | 0 |
| New Forest DC | 0 |
| Newark and Sherwood DC | — |
| Newcastle upon Tyne CC | 0 |
| Newcastle-under-Lyme BC | 0 |
| Northampton BC | — |
| Norwich CC | — |
| Nottingham CC | — |
| Nuneaton and Bedworth BC | — |
| Oadby and Wigston BC | 0 |
| Oldham BC | — |
| Oswestry BC | 0 |
| Oxford CC | — |
| Pendle BC | — |
| Penwith DC | 0 |
| Peterborough CC | 0 |
| Plymouth CC | — |
| Poole BC | — |
| Portsmouth CC | 0 |
| Preston CC | 1 |
| Purbeck DC | 0 |
| Reading DC | 1 |
| Redcar and Cleveland DC | 0 |
| Redditch BC | — |
| Reigate and Banstead BC | — |
| Restormel BC | — |
| Ribble Valley BC | 0 |
| Richmondshire DC | 0 |
| Rochdale BC | — |
| Rochford DC | 0 |
| Rossendale BC | 0 |
| Rother DC | — |
| Rotherham DC | 1 |
| Rugby BC | — |
| Runnymede BC | 0 |
| Rushcliffe BC | — |
| Rushmoor BC | 0 |
| Rutland CC | 0 |
| Ryedale CC | 0 |
| S Bedfordshire DC | — |
| S Bucks DC | — |
| S Cambridgeshire DC | 0 |
| S Derbyshire DC | — |
| S Gloucestershire DC | 0 |
| S Hams DC | 0 |
| S Holland DC | — |
| S Kesteven DC | — |
| S Lakeland DC | 0 |
| S Norfolk DC | — |
| S Northamptonshire DC | 0 |
| S Oxfordshire DC | 0 |
| S Ribble BC | 0 |
| S Shropshire DC | 0 |
| S Somerset DC | 0 |
| S Staffordshire C | 0 |
| S Tyneside DC | 0 |
| Salford CC | 12 |
| Salisbury DC | 0 |
| Sandwell BC | 1 |
| Scarborough BC | — |
| Sedgefield DC | — |
| Sedgemoor DC | 0 |
| Sefton MBC | — |
| Selby DC | 0 |
| Sevenoaks DC | — |
| Sheffield CC | — |
| Shepway DC | 0 |
| Shrewsbury and Atcham BC | — |
| Slough BC | — |
| Solihull BC | 1 |
| Southampton CC | 1 |
| Southend-on-Sea BC | 0 |
| Spelthorne BC | 0 |
| St. Albans CC | 0 |
| St. Edmundsbury BC | 0 |
| St. Helens MBC | 0 |
| Stafford BC | 0 |
| Staffordshire Moorlands DC | 0 |
| Stevenage BC | 0 |
| Stockport BC | — |
| Stockton-on-Tees DC | 3 |
| Stoke-on-Trent CC | 20 |
| Stratford-on-Avon DC | 0 |
| Stroud DC | 0 |
| Suffolk Coastal DC | 0 |
| Sunderland CC | 0 |
| Surrey Heath BC | 0 |
| Swale BC | 0 |
| Swindon BC | — |
| Tameside BC | 0 |
| Tamworth BC | 0 |
| Tandridge DC | 0 |
| Taunton Deane DC | — |
| Teesdale DC | 0 |
| Teignbridge DC | — |
| Telford and Wrekin DC | 0 |
| Tendring DC | — |
| Test Valley BC | 0 |
| Tewkesbury BC | 0 |
| Thanet DC | — |
| Three Rivers DC | 0 |
| Thurrock BC | 0 |
| Tonbridge and Malling BC | 0 |
| Torbay BC | 0 |
| Torridge DC | — |
| Trafford BC | — |
| Tunbridge Wells BC | 0 |
| Tynedale DC | 0 |
| Uttlesford DC | 0 |
| Vale of White Horse DC | 0 |
| Vale Royal BC | 0 |
| W Devon DC | 0 |
| W Dorset DC | 0 |
| W Lancashire DC | 0 |
| W Lindsey DC | 0 |
| W Oxfordshire DC | — |
| W Somerset DC | 0 |
| W Wiltshire DC | 0 |
| Wakefield CC | — |
| Walsall BC | 0 |
| Wansbeck DC | 0 |
| Warrington BC | — |
| Warwick DC | 0 |
| Watford BC | 0 |
| Waveney DC | — |
| Waverley BC | 0 |
| Wealden DC | — |
| Wear Valley DC | 0 |
| Wellingborough DC | 0 |
| Welwyn Hatfield DC | 0 |
| West Berkshire | — |
| Westminster CC | — |
| Weymouth and Portland BC | 0 |
| Wigan BC | — |
| Winchester CC | — |
| Windsor and Maidenhead RB | 0 |
| Wirral MDC | — |
| Woking BC | 0 |
| Wokingham DC | 0 |
| Wolverhampton CC | — |
| Worcester CC | 0 |
| Worthing BC | — |
| Wychavon DC | — |
| Wycombe DC | — |
| Wyre BC | 0 |
| Wyre Forest DC | 0 |
| York CC | 0 |
| Total | 64 |
| Number of returns received | 214 |
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many local authorities in (a) England, (b) the North West and (c) Greater Manchester have implemented footpath gating orders using the powers contained within the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many local authorities in (a) England, (b) the North West and (c) Greater Manchester have implemented footpath gating orders using the powers contained within the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005.
Whether any local authorities have made gating orders since the Highways Act 1980 (Gating Orders) (England) Regulations 2006 came into force; and, if so, for which highways they have made the orders.
Whether any local authorities have made gating orders since the Highways Act 1980 (Gating Orders) (England) Regulations 2006 came into force; and, if so, for which highways they have made the orders.
Gating certain highways for the prevention of crime and anti-social behaviour. Consultation paper. 11 p.
Gating certain highways for the prevention of crime and anti-social behaviour. Consultation paper. 11 p.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when the regulations on making gating orders under the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005 will come into force; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when the regulations on making gating orders under the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005 will come into force; and if he will make a statement.
SI 2006/537. (Negative instrument). Together with an explanatory memorandum from the Home Office. Coming into force 1 April 2006
SI 2006/537. (Negative instrument). Together with an explanatory memorandum from the Home Office. Coming into force 1 April 2006
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many gating orders have been made under the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005, broken down by local authority.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many gating orders have been made under the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005, broken down by local authority.
: I entirely understand the frustration felt in those circumstances. There is still an educative job to be done with some sections of the ASBO procedure. We heard of places in which good efforts have been made to educate magistrates and others at local level, so that they understand what...
: I entirely understand the frustration felt in those circumstances. There is still an educative job to be done with some sections of the ASBO procedure. We heard of places in which good efforts have been made to educate magistrates and others at local level, so that they understand what...
I am grateful to right hon. Gentleman for giving way, and I congratulate him and the Committee on the report, which addresses what is a significant and relatively recent phenomenon in my constituency. Recommendation 32 covers ASBO breach rates that run at about 40 per cent. What evidence did the...
I am grateful to right hon. Gentleman for giving way, and I congratulate him and the Committee on the report, which addresses what is a significant and relatively recent phenomenon in my constituency. Recommendation 32 covers ASBO breach rates that run at about 40 per cent. What evidence did the...
: The hon. and learned Gentleman has correctly picked up on a slight contradiction between two things I said. I congratulate him on listening; that is very nice, as one never knows on these occasions whether anyone will be listening at all. He has captured exactly the broad thrust of...
: The hon. and learned Gentleman has correctly picked up on a slight contradiction between two things I said. I congratulate him on listening; that is very nice, as one never knows on these occasions whether anyone will be listening at all. He has captured exactly the broad thrust of...
I am grateful to the right hon. Gentleman for giving way. Can I confirm something? I hope I correctly understood what he said. He said at the outset that there is already enough legislation to deal with this sort of thing, but did he also say just now that we...
I am grateful to the right hon. Gentleman for giving way. Can I confirm something? I hope I correctly understood what he said. He said at the outset that there is already enough legislation to deal with this sort of thing, but did he also say just now that we...
As always, the Home Affairs Committee has produced an excellent report. I hope that I am not alone in rather regretting the layout of this Room. One of the advantages of Westminster Hall was that the seating was laid out in the shape of a horseshoe. When we debated Select...
As always, the Home Affairs Committee has produced an excellent report. I hope that I am not alone in rather regretting the layout of this Room. One of the advantages of Westminster Hall was that the seating was laid out in the shape of a horseshoe. When we debated Select...
: It is useful to publish that information. I was about to refer to problems at local level, and my local authority, Southampton, has a good record in dealing with antisocial behaviour—it has been highlighted in previous Government reports. In a recent constituency case, the housing department, having decided not...
: It is useful to publish that information. I was about to refer to problems at local level, and my local authority, Southampton, has a good record in dealing with antisocial behaviour—it has been highlighted in previous Government reports. In a recent constituency case, the housing department, having decided not...
: Before my right hon. Friend moves on from housing injunctions, I want to say how effective it has been to publish the number of ASBOs that have been applied for by each local authority. That gives people living in an area a perspective on what their local council is...
: Before my right hon. Friend moves on from housing injunctions, I want to say how effective it has been to publish the number of ASBOs that have been applied for by each local authority. That gives people living in an area a perspective on what their local council is...