Skip to main content

1-20 of 221 results for subject:"Generic prescribing"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what recent assessment his Department has made of the potential impact of conflict in the Middle East on the supply of generic medicines to the UK.

Asked by
Rebecca Paul (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 June 2026
Reference
7909
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is taking to help increase the uptake of generic and biosimilar medicines to meet the objectives set out in the Government’s Life Sciences Sector Plan.

Asked by
Gregory Stafford (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 February 2026
Reference
112053
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, when the Government plans to establish a task and finish group to oversee delivery of the Life Sciences Sector Plan as it relates to generic and biosimilar medicines.

Asked by
Gregory Stafford (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 February 2026
Reference
112054
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of reinstating the Life Sciences Council with representation from the generic and biosimilar medicines industry.

Asked by
Gregory Stafford (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 February 2026
Reference
112056
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what consideration has been given to the role of the generic and biosimilar medicines sector in shaping life sciences policy, in the context of it supplying around 85% of NHS prescription drugs by volume.

Asked by
Gregory Stafford (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 February 2026
Reference
112057
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of whether the Voluntary Scheme for Branded Medicines Pricing and Access has caused a reduction in the supply of biosimilar medicines, and any associated impact on (1) patient outcomes, (2) NHS finances in the short term, and (3) the ability...

Asked by
Lord Warner (Crossbench)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 June 2023
Reference
HL8633
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what volume of sales under the Voluntary Scheme for Branded Medicines Pricing and Access are off-patent medicines; and how the suppliers of such medicines are represented in negotiations for the next scheme.

Asked by
Lord Warner (Crossbench)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 June 2023
Reference
HL8632
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to regret. Motion withdrawn.

Lead member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath
Answering member
Lord Markham
Department
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
25 May 2023
Reference
830 cc1018-1034
House
House of Lords

As I said, this is about the scheme and the pricing for this year. The negotiations happening now are about future years, while, technically, this debate is about making sure that the alignment is there for this year and its pricing. Given that the discount has been decided on for...

Member
Lord Markham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2023
Reference
830 cc1031-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very glad to introduce this debate, and thankful to noble Lords who have stayed to take part in it. Underpinning this debate is a major concern about the current state of the UK economy, beset as it is with low growth, low productivity, workforce shortages, regional...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2023
Reference
830 cc1019-1022
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I intervene in this short debate just to make a number of points that I feel strongly about and have done for quite a long time, because now is an important moment, when the Government are entering the process of negotiating the voluntary price access scheme starting at...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2023
Reference
830 cc1022-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the regret Motion moved so ably by the noble Lord, Lord Hunt of Kings Heath. I agree with quite a lot of what the noble Lord, Lord Lansley, has said, but I am not going to be as wide-ranging as him. The Minister may be relieved...

Member
Lord Warner (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2023
Reference
830 cc1024-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Hunt, for his Motion, and for giving us an opportunity to debate a series of questions raised by the statutory instrument about the life sciences sector more broadly.

I do not think that it is enough for us simply to...

Member
Lord Allan of Hallam (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2023
Reference
830 cc1026-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend for his usual expert and comprehensive explanation of his regret Motion on this SI, which is so important for the future of the NHS and the UK’s pharmaceutical industry and life sciences sector.

While the Government’s argument for maintaining equivalence between the two schemes...

Member
Baroness Wheeler (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2023
Reference
830 cc1028-1030
House
House of Lords

I thank noble Lords for the debate, and I particularly thank the noble Lord, Lord Hunt, for bringing forward this important subject. It was clear from the contributions of noble Lords that we all want the same thing here, and this is a discussion about how best to achieve it....

Member
Lord Markham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2023
Reference
830 cc1029-1031
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to interrupt the Minister’s flow. He said that we are having the fruitful discussions that the Prime Minister wants with the industry and that they are starting to progress. However, the industry itself is starting with a figure in the single figures, nowhere near 27%. I am...

Member
Lord Warner (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2023
Reference
830 c1031
House
House of Lords

The mechanics behind this debate—I was planning to say that my noble friend Lord Lansley made this point—are about the alignment of the voluntary and statutory schemes. I think that we would all agree that it is sensible that the two are roughly aligned. We can argue over how high...

Member
Lord Markham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2023
Reference
830 c1031
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to interrupt the Minister again. We are talking about signals given to the outside world, in these discussions that are now taking place about the voluntary scheme. As the noble Lord, Lord Lansley, asked, rather elegantly, why do we have two schemes in the first place? There...

Member
Lord Warner (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2023
Reference
830 c1031
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to the Minister. I think he has responded in a positive way, which is gratifying and, I hope, sets the foundation for a proper negotiation with the industry to get a jointly owned voluntary scheme which will incentivise global pharma to invest in the...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2023
Reference
830 c1034
House
House of Lords

May I just clarify? I completely agree that medicines are of course valuable. My comments were not about not spending money on medicines but about getting value for what we spend on medicines—not the quantity, not the quality, but the price that we are paying. I think that all noble...

Member
Lord Markham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 May 2023
Reference
830 c1034
House
House of Lords