Skip to main content

1-20 of 78 results for subject:"Government Efficiency Review"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have, if any, to assess the financial benefits to UK taxpayers that have resulted from the Green Review of public sector procurement, published in October 2010.

Asked by
Lord Myners (Crossbench)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 March 2019
Reference
HL14662
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they intend to commission a review into the benefit of adopting the recommendations on government procurement made in The Efficiency Review by Sir Philip Green, published in 2010.

Asked by
Lord Myners (Crossbench)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 November 2018
Reference
HL11093
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they plan to publish the savings in public sector procurement as a result of following the advice of Sir Philip Green; and whether they will consider inviting Sir Philip to review the adequacy and effectiveness of implementation.

Asked by
Lord Myners (Crossbench)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 June 2016
Reference
HL562
House
House of Lords

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office what recent progress his Department has made on his efficiency and reform agenda.

[118543]

Asked by
Gemma Doyle (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 September 2012
Reference
118543; 549 c332W
House
House of Commons

Lords debate on motion to take note of government procurement policy. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Sugar
Answering member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Debates
Date
24 November 2011
Reference
732 c1122-62
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, compliment the noble Lord, Lord Sugar, on securing this debate on government procurement policy. The trouble may be that there are a number of policies, most of which are not delivering what is required at the right price. I have seen this in local government, in...

Member
Lord Palmer of Childs Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2011
Reference
732 c1136-7
House
House of Lords

I see that time has caught up with me; the noble Baroness does not have to remind me of that. I look forward to the Minister’s response.

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2011
Reference
732 c1157
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this debate has ranged widely. I thank the noble Lord, Lord Sugar, for drawing the House’s attention to such an important issue. Procurement is central to the Government’s programme for reform and efficiency in public services and, as the Autumn Statement will make clear, to the growth agenda....

Member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2011
Reference
732 c1157-62
House
House of Lords

The one question that the noble Lord has not addressed on which I should welcome some comment is why in public procurement contracts we do not stipulate, as the previous Government did, that it is a perfectly reasonable quid pro quo to indicate how many apprentices there are and what...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2011
Reference
732 c1162
House
House of Lords

As the noble Lord will know, the number of apprentices has increased considerably in the past year, and this is something to which we are paying a great deal of attention. However, on his specific question, I shall investigate and write to him.

Member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2011
Reference
732 c1162
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lords who have contributed to this debate, many of whom have endorsed some of my sentiments. The Minister is right in pointing out that the head honcho to whom I referred is John Collington. I referred to having met somebody in the past whose...

Member
Lord Sugar (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2011
Reference
732 c1162
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend Lord Sugar for securing this debate and doing us the courtesy of indicating in advance what he would talk about. I will not follow him today; I should like to discuss some of the procurement issues surrounding the construction industry. It is an...

Member
Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2011
Reference
732 c1152-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, thank my noble friend Lord Sugar for creating this opportunity to debate a subject of vital importance, especially in today’s economic circumstances, against a background of government policies that are not delivering the growth that we need but delivering, unfortunately, the highest level of unemployment for...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2011
Reference
732 c1154-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is an opportune time for a debate on this issue. It comes just three days after the speech by the Cabinet Office Minister, Francis Maude, on proposals to radically overhaul and improve public procurement. It also comes at a time when all government departments are under pressure...

Member
Lord St John of Bletso (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2011
Reference
732 c1130-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend Lord Sugar for securing this debate. I am pleased to declare my interest as chairman of Warwick Manufacturing Group at the University of Warwick. The Government are Britain's biggest customer. As we have heard, the Government spent almost £240 billion last year. State...

Member
Lord Bhattacharyya (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2011
Reference
732 c1128-30
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Sugar, on securing this important debate. I also declare a number of shareholdings in defence companies that are listed in the Register of Lords’ Interests, because I shall talk about defence procurement. The problems and complexities of defence procurement have been with...

Member
Lord Lee of Trafford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2011
Reference
732 c1126-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am encouraged to see so many of your Lordships joining this debate. Government procurement is an important issue. After all, as taxpayers, it is our money that is being spent every day, and we have the right to ensure we are getting good value. Before I move...

Member
Lord Sugar (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2011
Reference
732 c1122-6
House
House of Lords

That this House takes note of government procurement policy.

Member
Lord Sugar (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2011
Reference
732 c1122
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend Lord Sugar and the other speakers for their remarks about how government procurement needs to improve fast, first, to make government services more effective and, secondly, in order for the Government to support and stimulate UK industry, commerce, technology and medicine. It is...

Member
Lord Hunt of Chesterton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2011
Reference
732 c1137-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend Lord Sugar made a typically robust and wise opening speech, drawing on his vast commercial experience, and what a reservoir of experience throughout the House has been revealed by this debate. My only interest to declare is that I am a Welsh Peer and I...

Member
Lord Anderson of Swansea (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2011
Reference
732 c1141-3
House
House of Lords