Skip to main content

1-20 of 52 results for subject:"Hull Trains"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Both Grand Central and Hull Trains have seen their passenger numbers increase dramatically since the pandemic, by more than 50% and 20% respectively. That is a significant increase compared with other operators. Why does the right hon. Lady think that might be?

Asked by
Gareth Bacon (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 June 2025
Reference
769 c1238
House
House of Commons

If the hon. Gentleman wants to trade statistics on the rail network, I can tell him that we have seen a massive increase in passenger numbers on TransPennine Express and LNER. In fact, last year we had a 7% overall increase in passenger journeys and passenger revenue overall went up from £10.6 billion to £11.5 billion, which is good news for the taxpayer and a clear sign that people want to come back and use our railways.

Answered by
Heidi Alexander (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 June 2025
Reference
769 c1238
House
House of Commons

I was not hoping to trade statistics— I was hoping that the right hon. Lady would answer the question. I will provide the answer: it is because they are open access operators. They have to compete for passengers by providing a service that passengers want at a price they are prepared to pay, and it is clearly working. Why have the Government indicated to the industry that they are not supportive of open access by stating their opposition to eight of the nine proposals submitted in February?

Asked by
Gareth Bacon (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 June 2025
Reference
769 c1239
House
House of Commons

I have said repeatedly at this Dispatch Box that we see a role for open access operators when they open up new markets and add value. We have to balance that against the revenue that they abstract from the public sector operator. We cannot have a situation in which we import too much congestion on to the rail network, because there is constrained and finite capacity. I am keen to see a mixed model of delivery going forward, but I need to reduce the taxpayer subsidy going into the rail network at the moment. We are supporting—

Answered by
Heidi Alexander (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 June 2025
Reference
769 c1239
House
House of Commons

Motion that this House has considered open access operators for rail services. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Martin Vickers
Answering member
Simon Lightwood
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Backbench debates
Date
6 February 2025
Reference
761 cc407-425WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. That is one of the key arguments in favour of introducing more open access operators, which have widened the number of destinations served.

If we drill into the latest passenger and financial figures, we see that there is a key lesson for those who are...

Member
Martin Vickers (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2025
Reference
761 cc410-409WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes an excellent point and highlights yet another group of provincial towns that would see benefits for their local economy and for leisure.

I hope that open access rail policy features among the Chancellor’s new tests on how to deliver growth across the country. As a Yorkshire MP,...

Member
Martin Vickers (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2025
Reference
761 c411WH
House
House of Commons

I agree that Italy and Grimsby are very similar. I will come to the hon. Lady’s point about the speed of the regulator’s decision making, which is absolutely crucial.

In addition to my desire and ambition for direct services to my constituency, it is vital that the significance of open access...

Member
Martin Vickers (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2025
Reference
761 cc412-1WH
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend will remember from the last Parliament that I campaigned for a footbridge over Suggitts Lane in Cleethorpes. Thankfully, I was supported by the then Prime Minister—Boris Johnson—who on one famous occasion at Prime Minister’s questions said:

“Suggitt’s Lane is never far from my thoughts”.

—[Official Report, 23 October...

Member
Martin Vickers (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2025
Reference
761 c414WH
House
House of Commons

I thank all the hon. Members who have taken part in what has been a very worthwhile debate. This is the shadow Minister’s first time on the Front Bench, and I am sure he will go far. I emphasise that the demand for a direct service to Grimsby and Cleethorpes...

Member
Martin Vickers (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2025
Reference
761 cc424-6WH
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered open access operators for rail services.

It is a pleasure to see you in the Chair this afternoon, Mrs Lewell-Buck. I am sure you will witness a stimulating debate.

I start by drawing attention to the progress made on the east coast main line,...

Member
Martin Vickers (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2025
Reference
761 cc409-8WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Member for Brigg and Immingham (Martin Vickers) on securing this debate, and I am very pleased to support him in it. He has been a long-standing campaigner on this issue. On the point about platform improvements at Market Rasen, is he aware of other areas in...

Member
Melanie Onn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2025
Reference
761 c408WH
House
House of Commons

We all agree that better choice and more services—in particular, direct services—are an objective that we all want. Unfortunately, in Keighley, we do not have any open access provision at the moment. Does my hon. Friend agree that if we achieved a direct link between Skipton and London or Ilkley...

Member
Robbie Moore (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2025
Reference
761 c409WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Member is making a really important point about coastal communities. Rural communities find themselves in a similar situation, where they may have lost a direct service. Wrexham, Shropshire and Midlands Railway has an excellent plan to run a direct-to-London service through Wrexham, Shropshire and the Midlands but it...

Member
Helen Morgan (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2025
Reference
761 c412WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Member for that intervention. She makes an important point about time. Time is of the essence as we strive to deliver better rail services. Perhaps we need a little of the spirit of the 19th century’s rail pioneers to fully connect coastal communities at last.

1.51 pm

Member
Alison Hume (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2025
Reference
761 c414WH
House
House of Commons

I thank my constituency neighbour, my hon. Friend the Member for Brigg and Immingham (Martin Vickers), for securing this important debate and for emphasising the national importance of open access. His point about Hull Trains and the opportunity it has given us is very powerful. I want to speak about...

Member
Edward Leigh (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2025
Reference
761 c414WH
House
House of Commons

I am very grateful to my hon. Friend for that intervention. This is a serious issue. There is absolutely no reason why the great conurbation of Grimsby and Cleethorpes should not have a direct train to London, and there is no reason why the good people who live in the...

Member
Edward Leigh (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2025
Reference
761 cc414-6WH
House
House of Commons

My Member of Parliament makes an excellent point. There are indeed other examples, up and down the country, where modest improvements have been made at minimal cost. It needs the Secretary of State to realise the economic benefits to the area, and she will surely see that this is an...

Member
Martin Vickers (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2025
Reference
761 cc408-410WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is speaking very well about the usefulness and benefit of having a good rail system. He will be aware of the new timetable that the national rail operators are proposing. For my constituency, Berwick-upon-Tweed is the most important station, although it is in England. It will be...

Member
John Lamont (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2025
Reference
761 c410WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is being very generous with his time, and I am pleased that he has mentioned the Italian rail system. Obviously, Italy is very similar to Grimsby, and we would certainly benefit from the kind of rail system that operates in Italy, which is very smooth and good...

Member
Melanie Onn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2025
Reference
761 c410WH
House
House of Commons