Skip to main content

1-20 of 275 results for subject:"INF Treaty"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Bilateral agreements aimed at restricting the nuclear arsenals of the United States and the Soviet Union/Russia have been in place since the early 1970s. For the first time in nearly 50 years that nuclear arms control architecture is now potentially heading towards a crisis.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
14 July 2020
Reference
CBP-8421

To ask Her Majesty's Government what action they have taken to try and establish confidence building measures between nuclear powers since the termination of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty.

Asked by
Lord West of Spithead (Labour)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 June 2020
Reference
HL4881
House
House of Lords

In August 2019 the United States formally withdrew from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
17 September 2019
Reference
CBP-8634

My Lords, I am glad that we have been able to reach the time for this debate but, like others, I am obviously sorry about the circumstances. I join them in wishing a speedy recovery to my very good friend the noble Lord, Lord Judd.

This report is presented to your...

Member
Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2019
Reference
799 cc174-6
House
House of Lords

If my noble friend will allow me, there is an important recommendation in view of the recent tension between India and Pakistan. The committee made a sensible recommendation to

invite India and Pakistan to attend the next P5 meeting; they have been included in past discussions. I see that the...

Member
Lord King of Bridgwater (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2019
Reference
799 cc176-7
House
House of Lords

Like my noble friend, I am not enlightened by the Government’s reply. It would be a very good idea, but the P5 would have to do it. As the UK is its chair, it may have some additional influence in persuading that step to be taken. I very much hope...

Member
Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2019
Reference
799 c177
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I draw the attention of the House to my entry in the register of interests, particularly my vice-chairmanship of the Nuclear Threat Initiative. I shall do my best to conclude my remarks within the newly imposed time limit. I congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Howell of Guildford, on...

Member
Lord Browne of Ladyton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2019
Reference
799 cc177-9
House
House of Lords

I have very real concerns on the cyber issue. As we construct the Dreadnought class, one needs to look down to the SMEs providing equipment. Proper attention is not being paid at the moment to the possibility of trojans and other things being placed within systems that are fitted in...

Member
Lord West of Spithead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2019
Reference
799 c178
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend for those points. The last time this issue was raised in a debate, he asked the Minister to consider red teaming the Dreadnought programme. The US regularly red teams its resilient military systems and is candid about its vulnerability to this threat. We are investing...

Member
Lord Browne of Ladyton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2019
Reference
799 c178
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have only a fraction of the experience and knowledge of the noble Lord, whose contribution to this debate I agree with. He gave very clear evidence as part of our committee’s inquiry and should be commended for the work that he is doing.

The noble Lord concluded by...

Member
Lord Purvis of Tweed (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2019
Reference
799 cc178-182
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the report we are debating today is complex and often a bit on the technical side. All the more credit, therefore, goes to the committee’s chair, the noble Lord, Lord Howell of Guildford, for guiding us towards a range of clear recommendations and for having introduced the report...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2019
Reference
799 cc182-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I add my congratulations to my noble friend Lord Howell for his excellent introduction to this debate. I thank the clerks and our researcher for this technical, detailed report.

Our committee’s report makes it very clear that we are living through a time of worldwide disruption and change. The...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2019
Reference
799 cc183-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest as a vice-president of the London Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament. I too congratulate the International Relations Committee and its chair the noble Lord, Lord Howell, on its excellent report.

When I am given a report like this, I turn immediately to the summary in the...

Member
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2019
Reference
799 cc186-7
House
House of Lords

I thank the committee for its truly excellent report, which rightly draws attention to the serious dangers faced by the world today with its rising nuclear risk but does so in a sober and balanced way.

I am going to focus only on the rising risk of nuclear conflict in Europe...

Member
Lord Harries of Pentregarth (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2019
Reference
799 cc187-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is inevitable that debates of this sort will be pretty sombre in tone, because this is an extremely sombre—if not deadly serious—subject. But the timing of our report and indeed of this debate comes on the eve of the 50th anniversary of the establishment of the non-proliferation...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2019
Reference
799 cc189-191
House
House of Lords

My Lords, like my fellow committee member, the noble Lord, Lord Grocott, I start by mentioning that the NPT is almost 50 years old, so we are looking at an anniversary. The committee’s report made clear that we felt that in many ways the NPT has been successful. The report...

Member
Baroness Smith of Newnham (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2019
Reference
799 cc191-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall begin with a little bit of good news. My noble friend Lord Judd is sitting up, cheerful and eager to get back to the House as soon as possible. He will be sorely missed in this debate.

I too welcome this excellent report and certainly the introduction...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2019
Reference
799 cc193-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I first apologise for being slightly late into the Chamber; I was caught unawares by the preceding Statement ending a little early. I thank my noble friend Lord Howell for tabling this Motion and all noble Lords for their perceptive and helpful contributions. I particularly pay tribute to...

Member
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2019
Reference
799 cc195-8
House
House of Lords

On the Government’s commitment to cybersecurity, every single time this issue is raised in whatever context in this House the government spokesperson raises this point about £1.9 billion—without explanation. The £1.9 billion announced in 2015 and again in 2016 is to cover five years of all the work that the...

Member
Lord Browne of Ladyton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2019
Reference
799 c196
House
House of Lords

I hear the noble Lord, but he will understand as well as anyone, with his distinguished experience in these matters, that we cannot comment on specific security measures and I do not think he would expect the Government to do that. But I hear his detailed questioning about the funding....

Member
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2019
Reference
799 cc196-200
House
House of Lords