1-20 of 2,557 results for subject:"Index linking"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.369 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.006 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Index linking"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Index linking" OR subject_t:Indexation OR subject_ses:91633
Type
House
Session
More
Year
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
More
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, whether his Department has made an assessment of the implications of retrospectively changing the indexation mechanism for existing Feed‑in Tariff contracts on investor confidence; and if he will ensure that no further retrospective adjustments, including freezes, reductions, or...
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, whether his Department has made an assessment of the implications of retrospectively changing the indexation mechanism for existing Feed‑in Tariff contracts on investor confidence; and if he will ensure that no further retrospective adjustments, including freezes, reductions, or...
An analytical annex, including an assessment of the potential impacts of this policy, was published alongside the Government response.
The Government considers that the change to indexation strikes an appropriate balance between reducing costs for consumers and maintaining investor confidence in the UK’s renewable energy sector. The Government remains committed to supporting accredited Feed-in Tariff generators for the remainder of their support period.
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what assessment his Department has made of the potential impact on households and small‑scale renewable‑energy investors of replacing Retail Prices Index indexation with Consumer Prices Index for Feed‑in Tariff payments; and whether consideration has been given to the...
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what assessment his Department has made of the potential impact on households and small‑scale renewable‑energy investors of replacing Retail Prices Index indexation with Consumer Prices Index for Feed‑in Tariff payments; and whether consideration has been given to the...
An analytical annex, including an assessment of the potential impacts of this policy, was published alongside the Government response.
The Government considers that the change to indexation strikes an appropriate balance between reducing costs for consumers and maintaining investor confidence in the UK’s renewable energy sector. The Government remains committed to supporting accredited Feed-in Tariff generators for the remainder of their support period.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether she plans to introduce an indexation mechanism linking the Approved Mileage Allowance Payment rate to (a) inflation and (b) motoring cost indices.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether she plans to introduce an indexation mechanism linking the Approved Mileage Allowance Payment rate to (a) inflation and (b) motoring cost indices.
Approved Mileage Allowance Payments (AMAPs) are used by employers to reimburse an employee's expenses for business mileage in their private vehicle. The AMAP rate is advisory, so employers can choose to pay more or less than the advisory rate. Employees reimbursed less than the AMAP rate may be able to claim tax relief on the difference, depending on their circumstances. Amounts reimbursed over the AMAP rate are classed as earnings and subject to Income Tax.
In recognition of the pressures facing drivers, the Government announced in May the first uprating of these rates since 2011, backdated to April 2026. For 2026/27, mileage rates for cars and vans will increase from 45p to 55p per mile for the first 10,000 miles annually, followed by 25p per mile thereafter. These rates are UK-wide so apply to Northern Ireland.
The 25p per mile rate for mileage above 10,000 miles remains unchanged, reflecting that the average motorist drives fewer than 10,000 miles for work and the need to balance targeted support with overall fiscal responsibility. Employees can also claim an additional 5p per mile for each fellow employee transported. Mileage rates for other vehicles, including motorcycles, remain unchanged.
Looking ahead and beyond 2026/27, the Government has already committed to a review of these rates and will set this out at the Budget. More broadly, the Government annually reviews the rates and thresholds of taxes and reliefs to ensure that they are appropriate and reflect the current state of the economy.
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, whether he is taking steps to ensure the Miners Pension Scheme members’ pensions will be fully index linked.
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, whether he is taking steps to ensure the Miners Pension Scheme members’ pensions will be fully index linked.
I met the Mineworkers’ Pension Scheme Trustees in February to discuss their proposals. We have jointly commissioned analysis which we are considering and we are working towards reaching agreement on future scheme arrangements.
Lords consideration of Commons reasons and amendments. Lords amendments 1, 5, 6 and 13 not insisted on. Lords amendments 15 to 24, 27, 30 to 34, 36, 38 to 42, 83 and 88 insisted on and Commons amendments 88A to 88C disagreed to on division (219 to 144). Lords amendments 26 and 37 not insisted on and Lords amendments 37B and 37C in lieu agreed to on division (216 to 148). Lords amendment 35 not insisted on and Lords amendment 35B in lieu agreed to on division (211 to 150). Lords amendment 43 not insisted on. Lords amendments 77 and 85 insisted on on division (162 to 151). Lords amendments 78 and 86 not insisted on. Lords amendments 79 and 87 not insisted on. Bill returned to the Commons with reasons and amendments.
Lords consideration of Commons reasons and amendments. Lords amendments 1, 5, 6 and 13 not insisted on. Lords amendments 15 to 24, 27, 30 to 34, 36, 38 to 42, 83 and 88 insisted on and Commons amendments 88A to 88C disagreed to on division (219 to 144). Lords amendments...
Moved by
Lord Katz
Moved by
Lord Katz
My Lords, in moving Motion A, I will also speak to Motions B, B1 and C. The Commons have disagreed with Amendment 1 on the grounds that it could introduce,
rather than mitigate, risks that the provision in Clause 2 could be used in unintended ways. Amendment 1 would place...
My Lords, in moving Motion A, I will also speak to Motions B, B1 and C. The Commons have disagreed with Amendment 1 on the grounds that it could introduce,
rather than mitigate, risks that the provision in Clause 2 could be used in unintended ways. Amendment 1 would place...
My Lords, in speaking to Motion B1, I welcome that the Government have committed to a review of Regulation 64A of the Local Government Pension Scheme Regulations 2013. That is an important and necessary step, and their further commitments today are most welcome.
However, if the GAD review is to be...
My Lords, in speaking to Motion B1, I welcome that the Government have committed to a review of Regulation 64A of the Local Government Pension Scheme Regulations 2013. That is an important and necessary step, and their further commitments today are most welcome.
However, if the GAD review is to be...
My Lords, I thank the Minister for explaining things in great detail from the Government’s perspective.
I will speak to Motion B1, which the Minister said has already been met. The Local Government Pension Scheme already has mechanisms to review and amend employer pension contributions and funding practices; for instance, under...
My Lords, I thank the Minister for explaining things in great detail from the Government’s perspective.
I will speak to Motion B1, which the Minister said has already been met. The Local Government Pension Scheme already has mechanisms to review and amend employer pension contributions and funding practices; for instance, under...
Motions D and D1 are the opening Motions of the next group.
Motions D and D1 are the opening Motions of the next group.
Have they been moved?
Have they been moved?
Not yet.
Not yet.
It says “D1” on the Order Paper.
It says “D1” on the Order Paper.
It is in the second group.
It is in the second group.
I see. I am sorry. Forgive me, I was going on to the next group.
On Motion B1, we will abstain rather than vote against it, because we think that these things are already in process, if dealt with properly.
I see. I am sorry. Forgive me, I was going on to the next group.
On Motion B1, we will abstain rather than vote against it, because we think that these things are already in process, if dealt with properly.
I am glad that, for once, our debate on the LGPS has been short and sweet. I thank both opposition Front Benches for their engagement on this issue. I am glad that the noble Viscount, Lord Younger, recognised that there has been movement. We understand the importance attached to the...
I am glad that, for once, our debate on the LGPS has been short and sweet. I thank both opposition Front Benches for their engagement on this issue. I am glad that the noble Viscount, Lord Younger, recognised that there has been movement. We understand the importance attached to the...
Moved by
Lord Katz
Moved by
Lord Katz
I have already spoken to Motion B. I beg to move.
I have already spoken to Motion B. I beg to move.
Moved by
Lord Katz
Moved by
Lord Katz
Moved by
Baroness Sherlock
Moved by
Baroness Sherlock