Skip to main content

1-20 of 399 results for subject:"Industrial training boards"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Laid by
Andrew Western
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
1 June 2026
Reference
2026/
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Janet Daby
Answering member
Neil O'Brien
Department
Department for Education
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Second Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
11 March 2025
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee
Date
19 June 2023
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, if she will take steps to remove the double levy charge on modular manufacturers by exempting them from the scope of the Construction Industry Training Board levy.

Asked by
Bill Esterson (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 April 2023
Reference
182274
House
House of Commons

Letter dated 28/04/2022 from Baroness Barran to Peers regarding issues raised in the Industrial Training Levy (Construction Industry Training Board) Order 2022 debate: number of people employed in the construction industry, membership of the CITB Levy Committee, pilot traineeship in bricklaying, technical colleges, and industry support for levy proposals. 3p.

Deposited by
Department for Education
Type
Deposited papers
Date
28 April 2022
Reference
DEP2022-0361
House
House of Lords

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Alex Burghart
Answering member
Toby Perkins
Department
Department for Education
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Fifth Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
26 April 2022
House
House of Commons

My Lords, as the Committee will no doubt appreciate, the construction sector is broad and a significant part of the UK economy. It is responsible for delivering infrastructure and large construction, including transport, energy, social infrastructure and commercial buildings. It is also responsible for delivering new housebuilding and for the...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2022
Reference
821 cc1-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for her helpful and informative introduction to a welcome order of importance to our national economy and, indeed, to our future. I also acknowledge the ever-present commitment, conscientiousness and insight of my noble friend Lord Watson. I declare my interest in the register as...

Member
Lord Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2022
Reference
821 cc3-4GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord, Lord Jones, for that tour de force, and, having spent the week in Anglesey, we have a Welsh connection.

As the Minister rightly said, the construction industry is hugely important to the economy of the UK. She also referenced the need for a pipeline of skilled...

Member
Lord Storey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2022
Reference
821 cc4-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for her introduction to the order, which it is fair to say is not controversial. It states that

“the Secretary of State is satisfied that the industrial training levy proposals are necessary to encourage adequate training in the industry”,

and we concur. For that reason, I...

Member
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2022
Reference
821 cc5-8GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank noble Lords for their contributions to the debate. I will attempt to cover the questions asked but I will of course write on any that I cannot answer at the Dispatch Box.

Before I go any further, the noble Lord, Lord Watson, highlighted the difference between the...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2022
Reference
821 cc8-10GC
House
House of Lords

I mentioned earlier that the impact assessment shows that 75% of employers, when asked, said that they wanted the current scheme to continue. Is it not unthinkable that, with that kind of backing, the Government might move away from the current model?

Member
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2022
Reference
821 c10GC
House
House of Lords

Obviously I cannot predict the future. I can only repeat what the review of 2017 said, on which basis the Government are moving forward. The review showed that there is an ongoing need for a central skills body and, as the noble Lord says, employers support it.

Following that review, the...

Member
Baroness Barran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2022
Reference
821 cc10-1GC
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Barran
Answering member
Lord Watson of Invergowrie
Department
Department for Education
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
25 April 2022
Reference
821 cc1-11GC
House
House of Lords
Laid by
Alex Burghart
Department
Department for Education
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
16 March 2022
Reference
SI 2022/492; 2022/
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Laid by
Gillian Keegan
Department
Department for Education
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
31 March 2021
Reference
SI 2021/421
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

My Lords, this is familiar ground for me, having moved the draft of industrial training board levy orders in the House on three occasions previously. The order before us enables the CITB to raise and collect a levy on employers in the construction industry. The objective of the levy is...

Member
Viscount Younger of Leckie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2018
Reference
790 cc1-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for introducing the order. As we know, the CITB has to apply every three years for authority to raise the levy from employers to enable it to continue operating and, as he set out, the industry is fragmented and has high levels of self-employment

notus-xml...

Member
Baroness Garden of Frognal (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2018
Reference
790 cc3-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his crystal-clear exposition of the order. I certainly do not wish to oppose it and I much appreciate the

figures supplied concerning the planned expenditure on infrastructure and the references to much-needed investment in housing.

My memory goes back to when I served in...

Member
Lord Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2018
Reference
790 cc4-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will draw attention to one of the other facets of the importance of the construction industry and of the CITB. I too agree that the order should quite properly go forward, but a number of factors need a little further exploration. In presenting the case, the Minister...

Member
Lord Stunell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2018
Reference
790 cc5-7GC
House
House of Lords