Skip to main content

1-20 of 119 results for subject:"International schools"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask His Majesty's Government, in the light of their decision to end study visas from certain countries, what consideration they have given to excepting from those restrictions, students at British international schools.

Asked by
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 March 2026
Reference
HL15239
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they plan to allow British international schools to award qualified teacher status.

Asked by
Lord Lexden (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 May 2018
Reference
HL7844
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they currently pay for the children of ambassadors and embassy staff to attend international schools. [HL947]

Asked by
Lord Storey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 July 2014
Reference
HL947; 755 c158WA
House
House of Lords

Education Bill. Lords committee stage fourth day. Clauses 11 to 13 agreed to. Schedules 12 and 13 agreed to. Grand Committee held in the Moses Room.

Department
Department for Education
Type
Debates on bills; Committee proceedings
Date
6 July 2011
Reference
729 c121-78GC
House
House of Lords

That would be libel.

Member
Lord Hill of Oareford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2011
Reference
729 c177GC
House
House of Lords

As before, I am grateful to the Minister. I ask him to reflect on the statistics, as the noble Baroness, Lady Hughes, invited him to do. It is essential that the unions provide us with concrete examples of pre-charge newspaper reports of a salacious nature, because so far they have...

Member
Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2011
Reference
729 c177GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will also be brief as we have already rehearsed many of the arguments this afternoon, so I will not detain the Committee for long. The noble Baroness, Lady Hughes of Stretford, referred to assembling the information that we have. We will, of course, do that although some...

Member
Lord Hill of Oareford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2011
Reference
729 c175-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will delay the Committee for just one minute. I originally raised these matters at Second Reading and I wanted to say a few words in support of the noble Lord, Lord Phillips, who has made a compelling and overpowering case. I am also mindful of the remarks...

Member
Lord Black of Brentwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2011
Reference
729 c175GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Baroness, and I would have been more cautious in my remarks had I known she was here. I think they are blinded by the numbers of allegations thrown around. Those tables are unscientific to an extraordinary extent. Let us remember that all we are...

Member
Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2011
Reference
729 c178GC
House
House of Lords

As a member of the Joint Committee on Human Rights, I feel that I ought to respond to that point. I am very sympathetic to the points that have been made, particularly by my noble friend Lord Black of Brentwood. It is my experience in the time that I have...

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2011
Reference
729 c178GC
House
House of Lords

No, it would be slander. He very reasonably said, ““Look at the end of the JCHR report where it exonerates the Government””. Indeed it does, but how it does is beyond my tiny brain to understand. I suspect that the committee was confused.

Member
Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2011
Reference
729 c177-8GC
House
House of Lords

I will have a go, and if I need to follow up subsequently, I will. We have made it clear that an offence is committed not only when somebody publishes an article or broadcasts a programme in the traditional media, but when somebody posts an allegation on the internet, even...

Member
Lord Hill of Oareford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2011
Reference
729 c169-70GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps I may pick up on what my noble friend said about private conversations not being included. I entirely understand that, but I do not understand where the Government think the border is in modern social media between private and public. Does he agree that Twitter is at...

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2011
Reference
729 c169GC
House
House of Lords

That would be private.

Member
Lord Hill of Oareford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2011
Reference
729 c170GC
House
House of Lords

Will a private letter from the parent of one child to the parent of another child in the class be regarded as a publication, or will that be private?

Member
Baroness Walmsley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2011
Reference
729 c170GC
House
House of Lords

I am not answering. I cannot respond to the speaker. We want to hear from the noble Lord, Lord Phillips.

Member
Lord Hill of Oareford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2011
Reference
729 c170GC
House
House of Lords

The issue of Facebook is challenging, because it is possible to establish closed groups within Facebook, which people can join only if they are invited. You would not regard those as public because you are there only by invitation. However, once you are in the group, things can be said....

Member
Lord Knight of Weymouth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2011
Reference
729 c170GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, when I tabled the amendments to Clause 13, I thought that I would leave it at that. However, as I delved more deeply into the background to the clause, had conversations particularly with the National Association of Schoolmasters and Union of Women Teachers, and read carefully the 13th...

Member
Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2011
Reference
729 c171-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for his, as usual, careful and considerate reply. There are a lot of very difficult technical issues involved in that group of amendments. I welcome his invitation to talk about them outside this Committee room, and I will certainly do that. I...

Member
Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2011
Reference
729 c170GC
House
House of Lords

At Second Reading, I quoted figures for the past 10 years from the department which showed that more than 1,700 allegations against teachers were made. If 85 per cent of them were not upheld, the figures do not support the argument that the noble Lord is making.

Member
Baroness Perry of Southwark (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2011
Reference
729 c173GC
House
House of Lords