Resolved, That this House concurs with the Lords Message of 25 January 2012 and that, notwithstanding the Resolution of this House of 14 July 2011, it be an instruction to the Joint Committee on Privacy and Injunctions that it should report by 15 March 2012.—

Resolved, That this House concurs with the Lords Message of 25 January 2012 and that, notwithstanding the Resolution of this House of 14 July 2011, it be an instruction to the Joint Committee on Privacy and Injunctions that it should report by 15 March 2012.—

Message brought from the Commons that they concur with the resolution of this House of 25 January that it be an instruction to the Joint Committee on Privacy and Injunctions that it should report by 15 March 2012.

Message brought from the Commons that they concur with the resolution of this House of 25 January that it be an instruction to the Joint Committee on Privacy and Injunctions that it should report by 15 March 2012.

Lords motion that, notwithstanding the resolution of this House of 27 June 2011, it be an instruction to the Joint Committee on Privacy and Injunctions that it should report by 15 March 2012. Agreed to on question (formal).

Lords motion that, notwithstanding the resolution of this House of 27 June 2011, it be an instruction to the Joint Committee on Privacy and Injunctions that it should report by 15 March 2012. Agreed to on question (formal).

Lords motion to appoint Lord Boateng to the Privacy and Injunctions Joint Committee in place of Lord Grabiner. Agreed to on question (formal). Message sent to Commons.

Lords motion to appoint Lord Boateng to the Privacy and Injunctions Joint Committee in place of Lord Grabiner. Agreed to on question (formal). Message sent to Commons.

That Lord Boateng be appointed a member of the Joint Committee in place of Lord Grabiner. That Lord Boateng be appointed a member of the Joint Committee in place of Lord Grabiner. Motion agreed, and a message was sent to the Commons.

That Lord Boateng be appointed a member of the Joint Committee in place of Lord Grabiner. That Lord Boateng be appointed a member of the Joint Committee in place of Lord Grabiner. Motion agreed, and a message was sent to the Commons.

Lords motion that the Commons message of 14 July be considered and that a Committee of 13 Lords be appointed to join with the Committee appointed by the Commons to consider privacy and injunctions; that the Committee should report by 29 February 2012; with proposed membership and powers. Agreed to on question (formal). Message sent to Commons.

Lords motion that the Commons message of 14 July be considered and that a Committee of 13 Lords be appointed to join with the Committee appointed by the Commons to consider privacy and injunctions; that the Committee should report by 29 February 2012; with proposed membership and powers. Agreed to...

That the Commons message of 14 July be considered and that a Committee of thirteen Lords be appointed to join with the Committee appointed by the Commons to consider privacy and injunctions, including: (1) how the statutory and common law on privacy and the use of anonymity injunctions and super-injunctions...

That the Commons message of 14 July be considered and that a Committee of thirteen Lords be appointed to join with the Committee appointed by the Commons to consider privacy and injunctions, including: (1) how the statutory and common law on privacy and the use of anonymity injunctions and super-injunctions...

Resolved, That this House concurs with the Lords Message of 27 June, that it is expedient that a Joint Committee of Lords and Commons be appointed to consider privacy and injunctions, including: (1) how the statutory and common law on privacy and the use of anonymity injunctions and super-injunctions has operated in practice; (2) how best to strike the balance between privacy and freedom of expression, in particular how best to determine whether there is a public interest in material concerning people’s private and family life; (3) issues relating to the enforcement of anonymity injunctions and superinjunctions, including the internet, cross-border jurisdiction within the United Kingdom, parliamentary privilege and the rule of law; and (4) issues relating to media regulation in this context, including the role of the Press Complaints Commission and the Office of Communications (OFCOM); That the Committee should report by 29 February 2012; That a Select Committee of thirteen Members be appointed to join with the Committee appointed by the Lords; That the Committee shall have power— (i) to send for persons, papers and records; 14 July 2011 : Column 585 (ii) to sit notwithstanding any adjournment of the House; (iii) to report from time to time; (iv) to appoint specialist advisers; and (v) to adjourn from place to place within the United Kingdom; That Mr Ben Bradshaw, Mr Robert Buckland, Philip Davies, George Eustice, Paul Farrelly, Martin Horwood, Eric Joyce, Mr Elfyn Llwyd, Penny Mordaunt, Yasmin Qureshi, Ms Gisela Stuart, Mr John Whittingdale and Nadhim Zahawi be members of the Committee

Resolved, That this House concurs with the Lords Message of 27 June, that it is expedient that a Joint Committee of Lords and Commons be appointed to consider privacy and injunctions, including: (1) how the statutory and common law on privacy and the use of anonymity injunctions and super-injunctions has...

Message brought from the Commons that they concur with the resolution of this House of 27 June relating to a Joint Committee to consider privacy and injunctions, including: (1) how the statutory and common law on privacy and the use of anonymity injunctions and super-injunctions has operated in practice; (2) how best to strike the balance between privacy and freedom of expression, in particular how best to determine whether there is a public interest in material concerning people’s private and family life; (3) issues relating to the enforcement of anonymity injunctions and super-injunctions, including the internet, cross-border jurisdiction within the United Kingdom, parliamentary privilege and the rule of law; and (4) issues relating to media regulation in this context, including the role of the Press Complaints Commission and the Office of Communications (OFCOM); and that they have made the following orders: That the Committee should report by 29 February 2012. That a Select Committee of thirteen Members be appointed to join with the Committee appointed by the Lords. That the Committee shall have power- (i) to send for persons, papers and records; (ii) to sit notwithstanding any adjournment of the House; (iii) to report from time to time; (iv) to appoint specialist advisers; and (v) to adjourn from place to place within the United Kingdom.

Message brought from the Commons that they concur with the resolution of this House of 27 June relating to a Joint Committee to consider privacy and injunctions, including: (1) how the statutory and common law on privacy and the use of anonymity injunctions and super-injunctions has operated in practice; (2)...

Lords debate on motion that it is expedient that a joint committee of Lords and Commons be appointed to consider privacy and injunctions, including: (1) how the statutory and common law on privacy and the use of anonymity injunctions and super-injunctions has operated in practice; (2) how best to strike the balance between privacy and freedom of expression, in particular how best to determine whether there is a public interest in material concerning people's private and family life; (3) issues relating to the enforcement of anonymity injunctions and super-injunctions, including the internet, cross-border jurisdiction within the United Kingdom, parliamentary privilege and the rule of law; and (4) issues relating to media regulation in this context, including the role of the Press Complaints Commission and the Office of Communications (OFCOM); and that the committee should report by 29 February 2012. Agreed to on question. Message sent to Commons.

Lords debate on motion that it is expedient that a joint committee of Lords and Commons be appointed to consider privacy and injunctions, including: (1) how the statutory and common law on privacy and the use of anonymity injunctions and super-injunctions has operated in practice; (2) how best to strike...

My Lords, I beg to move the first Motion standing in my name on the Order Paper.

My Lords, I beg to move the first Motion standing in my name on the Order Paper.

My Lords, perhaps I may also ask my noble friend how this committee is to be chosen and, particularly in view of this afternoon’s debate, what opportunities will be made available for Back-Benchers who wish to be members of this committee to put themselves forward?

My Lords, perhaps I may also ask my noble friend how this committee is to be chosen and, particularly in view of this afternoon’s debate, what opportunities will be made available for Back-Benchers who wish to be members of this committee to put themselves forward?

My Lords, on the question from the noble Lord, Lord Taylor, the terms of reference are wide and varied. I suggest that the best way for him to make his views known is to write to the chairman with his submission once the committee has been set up. As for...

My Lords, on the question from the noble Lord, Lord Taylor, the terms of reference are wide and varied. I suggest that the best way for him to make his views known is to write to the chairman with his submission once the committee has been set up. As for...

That it is expedient that a joint committee of Lords and Commons be appointed to consider privacy and injunctions, including: (1) how the statutory and common law on privacy and the use of anonymity injunctions and super-injunctions has operated in practice; (2) how best to strike the balance between privacy...

That it is expedient that a joint committee of Lords and Commons be appointed to consider privacy and injunctions, including: (1) how the statutory and common law on privacy and the use of anonymity injunctions and super-injunctions has operated in practice; (2) how best to strike the balance between privacy...

My Lords, under the terms of references which the Leader of the House has suggested in the paper before us, will the committee take into consideration the matters of entrapment and false representation?

My Lords, under the terms of references which the Leader of the House has suggested in the paper before us, will the committee take into consideration the matters of entrapment and false representation?