Skip to main content

1-20 of 117 results for subject:"Local justice areas"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Justice Committee
Date
27 March 2026
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary David Lammy
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Consultation papers (Government responses); Command papers
Date
24 March 2026
Reference
CP 1548
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Liz Saville Roberts
Answering member
Sarah Sackman
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
771 cc269-276
House
House of Commons

From March to June this year, the Ministry of Justice held a public consultation on proposed reform of local justice areas. The consultation sought responses on a range of proposed structural changes set to affect magistrates across England and Wales. Among those proposed changes is the merging of three magistrates...

Member
Liz Saville Roberts (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
771 c269
House
House of Commons

I commend the right hon. Member for Dwyfor Meirionnydd—I hope that is somewhere near the Welsh, but with an Ulster Scots accent—for bringing forward this debate and I congratulate her on it. I spoke to her beforehand just to ascertain the direction of travel. Does she agree that magistrates must...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
771 c269
House
House of Commons

I am very grateful to the hon. Gentleman for his intervention. Of course, this is what we talk about: the nature of justice serving those communities. It needs to know the people within those communities and to reflect their characteristics to best serve the victims, defendants, advocates and witnesses in...

Member
Liz Saville Roberts (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
771 cc269-272
House
House of Commons

Let me begin by congratulating the right hon. Member for Dwyfor Meirionnydd (Liz Saville Roberts) —that was my best attempt at Welsh pronunciation; I hope I did not vandalise it—on securing this important debate on the reform of local justice areas. I agree with her that the contribution of magistrates...

Member
Sarah Sackman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
771 cc273-4
House
House of Commons

I am very interested to hear the Minister mention police forces, because I suspected that that was partly the driver. On community policing, will she recognise that North Wales police have felt the need to separate the area into three—a highly populous area in the east, a middle area, and...

Member
Liz Saville Roberts (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
771 c274
House
House of Commons

That is precisely why we have a consultation—to reflect the variation in different parts of the country. In most cases, the criminal justice area and the area in which a police force operates will be a natural fit for a bench, but that will not necessarily work for everyone. We...

Member
Sarah Sackman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
771 cc274-6
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Justice Committee
Date
1 April 2025
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Shabana Mahmood
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Consultation papers; Command papers
Date
31 March 2025
Reference
CP 1286
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to speak briefly to Amendment 28 standing in my name. I would be grateful if the House would indulge me just for a few minutes. As I explained last week when I was presenting my Private Member’s Bill, Public Health England pointed out that, in just...

Member
Bishop of St Albans (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 March 2022
Reference
820 cc1755-6
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames

1: Clause 1, page 1, leave out line 9

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment, and others in the name of Lord Marks to Clause 1, would remove the power to include provision in quashing orders removing or limiting their retrospective effect (“prospective only quashing orders”).

Member
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 March 2022
Reference
820 c1715
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendments 1 to 3 in my name remove the power to make a quashing order prospective only or otherwise to limit its retrospective effect. These amendments replicate amendments tabled in Committee by the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, who unfortunately already had commitments abroad for today when I put...

Member
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 March 2022
Reference
820 cc1715-1720
House
House of Lords

In the absences of the noble Lord, Lord Anderson of Ipswich, who has unfortunately caught Covid, and the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, I shall speak to Amendment 4. This would remove subsections (9) and (10) of the proposed new Section 29A of the Senior Courts Act 1981. This amendment is...

Member
Lord Etherton (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 March 2022
Reference
820 cc1719-1721
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Clause 1 gives judges a new power. I suggest that this is a power which enables them to do justice better between the parties, and to avoid some of the hard edges which currently obtain. Remedies in judicial review have always been discretionary. Nothing about this clause changes...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 March 2022
Reference
820 cc1721-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as I have reminded your Lordships’ House before, I have no legal training and so I will use very simple language here.

I have a huge amount of respect for the noble Lord, Lord Wolfson, and I just cannot believe that he is going to convince the House that...

Member
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 March 2022
Reference
820 c1722
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am in the happy position of having somebody agree with me on every point—but not everybody agrees. The Minister is a remarkable advocate. If he came to my home and we had a family cat, after he had spoken for about two minutes the cat would be...

Member
Lord Judge (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 March 2022
Reference
820 cc1722-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I oppose these amendments. The power to make a prospective quashing order brings clear benefits. Such an order has more teeth than a mere declaration that a Secretary of State has acted unlawfully. It would be able to indicate that regulations will be quashed within a certain time...

Member
Lord Sandhurst (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 March 2022
Reference
820 cc1723-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Labour Party supports the amendment from the noble Lord, Lord Anderson, to remove the statutory presumption and make it clear that judicial remedies should be restricted in this way only in exceptional circumstances. The clause’s effect would be for courts to have less power to provide redress...

Member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 March 2022
Reference
820 cc1724-5
House
House of Lords