Skip to main content

1-20 of 810 results for subject:"Locking on"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

An overview of legislation, guidance and debates related to the policing of protests.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
SN05013
Laid by
Secretary Shabana Mahmood
Department
Home Office
Type
Command papers
Date
18 June 2026
Reference
CP 1597
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
Type
Public acts
Date
2 May 2023
Reference
CHAP 15 2023; 2023 c. 15

Moved by

Lord Coaker

1: Before Clause 1, insert the following new Clause—

“Meaning of “serious disruption”

(1) In this Act, “serious disruption” means disruption causing significant harm to persons, organisations or the life of the community, in particular where—

(a) it may result in a significant delay to the delivery of a time-sensitive product...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2023
Reference
827 c426
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I start consideration on Report by moving my Amendment 1. I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Jones, the noble Lord,

Lord Paddick, and my noble friend Lady Chakrabarti, for their support for this amendment regarding serious disruption and its meaning and relevance to this Bill’s new powers. I...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2023
Reference
827 cc426-9
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord spoke about legal certainty. Could he help the House on how a court is to determine whether disruption is “prolonged”? If there is locking on and I am unable to take my child to school or my mother-in-law to hospital for an hour, two hours, or 10...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2023
Reference
827 c429
House
House of Lords

That is the point I am making: there is of course going to be a debate about what various words mean. I have admitted it. I said to the noble Lord and to others that I have asked in the debate what “significant” means in certain situations. All I am...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2023
Reference
827 cc429-430
House
House of Lords

I think the noble Lord said, just before the intervention from the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, that it would not be necessary to prove serious disruption. That cannot be right, with respect; I hope it was a mistake on his part. I understand that the proposed new clause inserted by...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2023
Reference
827 c430
House
House of Lords

Yes, of course. If I gave that impression, it was a mistake on my part. This is the whole point: there has to be “serious disruption”, as in my amendment. The debate—not the argument but the debate, as the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, just raised—is about what we actually mean...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2023
Reference
827 c430
House
House of Lords

I am curious about this “serious disruption”. Quite honestly, if anyone has driven on the M4, the M25 or through the streets of London, they will know what serious disruption is, because we get it every single day from people using their cars. If we have any confusion about what...

Member
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2023
Reference
827 c430
House
House of Lords

I agree with my friend the noble Baroness about the importance of the issues. I think everyone in the Chamber is taking this seriously. There is a legitimate debate going on as to what “serious disruption” means. My friend is right to point out that we are discussing very serious...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2023
Reference
827 cc430-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support Amendment 1, and no less strongly I oppose Amendment 5 proposed by the Government, my noble and learned friend Lord Hope and others. I never feel comfortable at the opposite end of the spectrum from my noble and learned friend Lord Hope, but I trust that...

Member
Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2023
Reference
827 cc431-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will first address the opening remarks of the noble Lord, Lord Coaker. As I have told the House before, I have considerable experience of public order policing and my view is that the police have sufficient powers without any of the measures contained in this Bill. In...

Member
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2023
Reference
827 cc432-3
House
House of Lords

That was a natural break in proceedings as I am now going on to talk about the definition of serious disruption.

As we have heard, Amendments 5, 14, 24 and part of Amendments 50 and 51 relate to the definition of serious disruption. The Minister will no doubt cite the Commissioner...

Member
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2023
Reference
827 cc433-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we genuinely saw a demonstration there during an argument about what might constitute a “serious” or “minor” disruption. We could argue for ages whether it was “serious” or “minor”, but one thing I want to stress is why I support raising the threshold to the maximum and why...

Member
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2023
Reference
827 c434
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I would have thought that the necessity for the Lord Speaker to retire for five minutes might be termed a “serious disruption” of the working of this House. However, the point I want to make, briefly, concerns the use of the phrase “capable of causing”. According to Amendment...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2023
Reference
827 c436
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow the noble and learned Baroness, Lady Butler-Sloss, and a daunting privilege, as always, to follow the noble and learned Lord, Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood. My views on the necessity and desirability of this proposed anti-terror-style legislation are no secret. But whether noble...

Member
Baroness Chakrabarti (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2023
Reference
827 cc436-7
House
House of Lords

I would like to speak next because my amendments have been mentioned and it is probably best that I explain what they are. I stress that the amendments under discussion are not my amendments: they are Amendments 5, 14 and 24 in this group, which substantially repeat amendments I tabled...

Member
Lord Hope of Craighead (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2023
Reference
827 c437
House
House of Lords

I would like to clarify that I wholeheartedly support Amendment 1, which is a definition of “serious disruption”.

Member
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2023
Reference
827 c437
House
House of Lords

So there is agreement that a definition is needed because of the nature of the crime and the consequences that follow from it. The committee noted that a definition was given in Sections 73 and 74 of the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022, to which the noble Baroness,...

Member
Lord Hope of Craighead (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2023
Reference
827 c438
House
House of Lords