Skip to main content

1-20 of 35 results for subject:"Maritime Incident Response Group"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

As part of the comprehensive spending review that the Government set out last October, we announced the intention to consult interested parties about a review of the maritime incident response group (MIRG) funded by the Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA). Since it was established in 2006, the MIRG has responded...

Member
Mike Penning (Conservative)
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Written statements
Date
15 September 2011
Reference
532 c64-5WS
House
House of Commons

My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport (Mike Penning) has made the following Ministerial Statement. As part of the comprehensive spending review that the Government set out last October, we announced the intention to consult with interested parties about a review of the Maritime Incident Response Group...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Written statements
Date
15 September 2011
Reference
730 c69WS
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee reports (Government responses); House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Transport Committee
Date
7 September 2011
Reference
HC 1482 2010-12
House
House of Commons

Twenty-ninth backbench debate (part one). Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Louise Ellman
Department
House of Commons
Type
Backbench debates
Date
23 June 2011
Reference
530 c496-9
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the Committee and my hon. Friend as its Chair on an excellent report. I think the Government will take notice of it, because they said they would wait for the report and act on its conclusions. Does my hon. Friend agree that had coastguards across the United Kingdom...

Member
Albert Owen (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2011
Reference
530 c496
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Lady and the Committee on an excellent report that raises a number of alarming concerns about both coastguards and emergency towing vessels, about which I am particularly worried and which she describes as ““inviting disaster””. Given that the proposals were started under the previous Government and...

Member
Julian Huppert (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2011
Reference
530 c497
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Lady agree that willingness to listen and change policy is a sign of strength, as the Prime Minister asserted at this week's press conference? My regional paper emphasised that point today in an article which concluded that the consequences would be counted in lives lost.

Member
Sheryll Murray (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2011
Reference
530 c497
House
House of Commons

We were extremely critical of how the proposals were put together, excluding any opportunity for input from serving coastguards. Our report is unanimous. We recognise that modernisation of the coastguard is desirable. We see the coastguard as an essential emergency service, whose work load is increasing, and any proposals to...

Member
Louise Ellman (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2011
Reference
530 c496
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,"That this House notes the publication of the Sixth Report from the Transport Select Committee on The Coastguard, Emergency Towing Vessels and the Maritime Incident Response Group, HC 948." I am delighted to present the Transport Committee's report on the Floor of the House, and I thank...

Member
Louise Ellman (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2011
Reference
530 c496
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman raises an extremely important point; we noted that although the proposals appeared to address the commercial shipping sector to some degree, they seemed to ignore smaller vessels and the fishing industry. We were extremely concerned about that omission.

Member
Louise Ellman (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2011
Reference
530 c497
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Lady on her report. One of the most devastating of her recommendations was:"““It appears to us that the current proposals pay more attention to the MCA's statutory obligations towards the commercial shipping industry and far less to its obligations towards leisure craft and small boat users....

Member
Philip Hollobone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2011
Reference
530 c497
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady makes an important point. Our concern is about the saving of lives. The Government have indeed stated that they are listening; the test will in part be their reaction to our report. The Committee cannot support the Government's proposals for the future of the coastguard in their...

Member
Louise Ellman (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2011
Reference
530 c497
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman makes an important point. I will talk about emergency towing vehicles shortly; I accept his point that decisions about human life should not be made in haste. Our major concern is about safety and the loss of local knowledge, or ““situational awareness””, among coastguard officers which will...

Member
Louise Ellman (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2011
Reference
530 c497
House
House of Commons

I thank our Chairman for giving way. Does she agree that regardless of how many coastguard stations we end up with, it is vital that existing stations are open 24 hours a day to ensure operational continuity when there is an incident?

Member
John Leech (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2011
Reference
530 c498
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman played an important part in producing the report and, like the Committee, I agree that 24-hour stations should be the way forward. The Committee expresses serious concerns about the concept of daylight-only stations. The proposals assume that technology can replace local knowledge, but we were not convinced...

Member
Louise Ellman (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2011
Reference
530 c498
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that any future proposal should be made in an oral statement to the House, so that Members on both sides have an opportunity to ask questions on that initial statement?

Member
Albert Owen (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2011
Reference
530 c499
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes an important point. New proposals should enable the widest possible consultation, including the involvement of hon. Members. I call on the Government to withdraw their proposals and to produce alternatives that address the concerns that we have identified. I present the report to the House. Question...

Member
Louise Ellman (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2011
Reference
530 c499
House
House of Commons

I, too, congratulate my hon. Friend and her Committee on their excellent report. I have visited the Solent coastguard station, which would be the radio centre for most of the country under the proposals, and it was clear that it would be difficult to achieve local knowledge on the basis...

Member
Lord Whitehead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2011
Reference
530 c498
House
House of Commons

I agree with my hon. Friend's comments. The concern about local knowledge or, perhaps more broadly, situational knowledge cannot be emphasised enough. Our concern in that respect relates not only to the coastguard officers themselves, but to the volunteer coastguard. When we conducted our inquiry, particularly when we visited the...

Member
Louise Ellman (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2011
Reference
530 c498
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the hon. Lady, who is the Chair of the Committee. I, too, gained a great deal from visiting the three stations—Falmouth, Greenock and Stornoway—and what struck me particularly was the willingness of the serving officers there to adapt and move forward. They do not necessarily wish...

Member
Iain Stewart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2011
Reference
530 c498
House
House of Commons