Skip to main content

1-20 of 4,885 results for subject:"Means-tested benefits"

Type

-
Early day motions (13)
+ Legislation (107) + Acts (5)
-
Public acts (5)
+ Bills (9) + Public bills (9)
-
Consolidation bills (2)
-
Government bills (4)
+ Private members' bills (3)
-
Ten minute rule bills (3)
+ Delegated legislation (93)
-
Statutory instruments (93)
+ Members' contributions (3,668)
-
Business questions (4)
-
Maiden speeches (1)
-
Oral answers to questions (276)
-
Oral question time interventions (1)
+ Oral questions (293)
-
Prime Minister's questions (20)
-
Topical questions (18)
-
Points of order (5)
-
Proceeding contributions (3,097)
+ Parliamentary committees (41) + Committee proceedings (32)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (3)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (7)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (8)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (12)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
-
Select Committee reports (5)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (4)
+ Parliamentary papers (66)
-
Annual reports (1)
-
Command papers (15)
-
Consultation papers (7)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (2)
-
Deposited papers (41)
-
House of Commons papers (7)
-
House of Lords papers (2)
-
Impact assessments (5)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (133) + Debates (102)
-
Adjournment debates (6)
+ Committee proceedings (32)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (3)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (7)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (8)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (12)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
+ Legislative debates (78)
-
Debates on bills (57)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (20)
+ Monarch's speech debates (2)
-
Queen's speech debates (2)
-
Opposition days (10)
-
Questions for short debate (4)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
-
Private notice questions (1)
+ Statements (23) + Oral statements (10)
-
Ministerial statements (10)
-
Written statements (13)
+ Written corrections (4)
-
Ministerial corrections (4)
+ Parliamentary questions (1,175)
-
Business questions (4)
+ Oral questions (293)
-
Prime Minister's questions (20)
-
Topical questions (18)
-
Private notice questions (1)
-
Written questions (877)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
+ Research briefings (22) + Commons Briefing papers (16)
-
Briefing papers on bills (3)
-
Constituency casework (1)
-
Commons Debate packs (3)
+ Lords Library Briefings (3)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (2)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, whether he has made an assessment of the potential impact of treating Armed Forces Compensation Scheme payments as income for means-tested benefit assessments.

Asked by
David Reed (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
17657
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, in what way defined contribution pension pots held in drawdown are taken into account when determining entitlement to means-tested benefits; and what guidance his Department provides to pensioners on the relationship between pension drawdown decisions and benefit eligibility.

Asked by
Connor Naismith (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Tabled
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
19245
House
House of Commons

Civil compensation is disregarded from pension credit entitlement calculations, but military compensation is not. I know that the new Minister for Veterans is sympathetic to addressing this injustice, so I wonder whether he would meet me and the family of Pauline Cole—a veteran who was fighting to address this matter—in order to put it right.

Asked by
Josh Babarinde (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
6 July 2026
Reference
789 c23
House
House of Commons

I will meet with the hon. Gentleman and the family.

Answered by
Calvin Bailey (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
6 July 2026
Reference
789 c23
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, whether he has made an assessment of the impact of treating Armed Forces Compensation Scheme payments as income for means-tested benefit assessments.

Asked by
Greg Smith (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
12273
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, whether he has made an assessment of the impact of treating Armed Forces Compensation Scheme payments as income for means-tested benefit assessments.

Asked by
Rebecca Smith (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
12993
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, if he will make an assessment of the potential merits of means testing PIP to ensure targeted support.

Asked by
Joy Morrissey (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
900683
House
House of Commons

The increased PIP costs are expected to add an extra £5 billion to the welfare budget this year. As the TaxPayers’ Alliance has highlighted, the number of households earning over £100,000 and getting PIP has doubled to 200,000 claimants. Will the Minister make an assessment of the potential merits of means-testing PIP to ensure targeted support?

Asked by
Joy Morrissey (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
788 c622
House
House of Commons

Together with disabled people, we are co-producing a review of PIP to ensure that it is fair and fit for the future. The review’s terms of reference reflect the view of successive Governments that PIP should be a non-means-tested cash benefit for people both in and out of work, because anybody can incur additional costs as a result of long-term ill health or disability.

Answered by
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
788 c622
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, if he will consider exempting compensation awarded to veterans for service-related (a) illness and (b) injury from means testing for benefits.

Asked by
Jess Brown-Fuller (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 June 2026
Reference
8476
House
House of Commons

Report stage. New clause 1, discussed with new clauses 2 to 24, debated and withdrawn. New clause 4 negatived on division (164 to 311). New clause 11 negatived on division (104 to 391). New clause 22 negatived on division (74 to 323). Amendment 11 negatived on division (171 to 322)....

Lead member
Louise Sandher-Jones
Answering member
Mark Francois; David Reed
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Debates on bills
Date
22 June 2026
Reference
788 cc83-153
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
Jeremy Corbyn (Your Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2026
Reference
788 c83
House
House of Commons

The amendments I have tabled concern the right of British nationals to engage in foreign wars. What brought them about is reports that British nationals have been involved in Israel Defence Forces activities in Gaza and other places. To prevent this from happening in future, my amendments would amend the...

Member
Jeremy Corbyn (Your Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2026
Reference
788 cc96-7
House
House of Commons

The Bill has four key themes. First, it creates the Defence Housing Service, which is a fantastic move forward; it will change for a generation how our people are looked after in service family accommodation. Secondly, it will make major improvements to our service justice system, which is another fantastic...

Member
Al Carns (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2026
Reference
788 c97
House
House of Commons

On reservists, I am sure that the hon. Member will be aware that the maximum age of recall is being increased from 60 to 65, and the threshold for mobilisation is being lowered. The problem in Northern Ireland is that our reservists are overwhelmingly employed in civilian jobs in our...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2026
Reference
788 c97
House
House of Commons

As we progress the Bill collectively, we could, in some areas, look at giving better support to employers, but it is worth being clear that the Bill looks to extend service from anything from four to 16 years. It allows for the return to service of ex-military personnel until they...

Member
Al Carns (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2026
Reference
788 c97
House
House of Commons

It is a privilege to follow the hon. Member for Birmingham Selly Oak (Al Carns), who I may refer to again in a few minutes. It is important to place on record the respect he has engendered across the House by resigning on an important issue of principle relating to...

Member
Mark Francois (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2026
Reference
788 cc97-8
House
House of Commons

I remind the Opposition spokesperson that new clause 1, which I tabled, would prevent the Secretary of State authorising the entry of members of visiting forces from states whose commanders are subject to International Criminal Court arrest warrants or proceedings of the International Court of Justice. I do not see...

Member
Jeremy Corbyn (Your Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2026
Reference
788 c98
House
House of Commons

I am old school, and I was taught that in a debate, it is polite to refer to the Member who moved the lead amendment. That is what I was seeking to do. As I think the House would realise, I am making a very different point and a different...

Member
Mark Francois (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2026
Reference
788 c99
House
House of Commons

In the context of the armed forces covenant and all the great work it does for military families, does my right hon. Friend agree that the Royal British Legion also does important work in this regard? Will he join me in saying thank you to the Royal British Legion in...

Member
Peter Fortune (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2026
Reference
788 c100
House
House of Commons