Skip to main content

1-20 of 111 results for subject:"Merseyside Development Corporation"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Whether they have plans to release an evaluation of the Merseyside Development Corporation in the near future; and if not, why not. [HL 2875]. - Includes ref to reports in Library.

Asked by
Lord Sefton of Garston (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 July 1998
Reference
HL 2875; 592 c165-6WA
House
House of Lords
Type
Unprinted papers
Date
16 July 1998
House
House of Commons
Type
Unprinted papers
Date
19 June 1998
House
House of Commons

Draft SI on London Docklands Development Corporation (SI 1998/803) and unnumbered SI on urban development corporations in England (area and constitution) (SI 1998/769). Lords debate on motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Hayman
Answering member
Lord Brabazon of Tara
Department
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
13 March 1998
Reference
587 c426-8
House
House of Lords

Draft SI on London Docklands Development Corporation (SI 1998/803) and unnumbered SI on urban development corporations in England (area and constitution) (SI 1998/769). Considered by Standing Committee.

Lead member
Richard Caborn
Department
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Date
3 March 1998
Reference
2nd SC on DL
House
House of Commons

SI 1998/84 (Negative instrument). Coming into force 25 March 1998.

Department
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
27 January 1998
Reference
SI 1998/84
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
Type
Unprinted papers
Date
21 July 1997
House
House of Commons
Type
Unprinted papers
Date
23 July 1996
House
House of Commons

If he will meet the honourable Member for Liverpool, Riverside, to discuss matters affecting his constituents living in the Merseyside Development Corporation area.

Asked by
Robert Parry (Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 July 1996
Reference
282 c24W; 38863
House
House of Commons

How much was paid to the Mersey Docks and Harbour Company for the Albert Dock in 1982. - Merseyside Development Corporation paid £100,000 to the Mersey Docks and Harbour Company for the Albert dock.

Asked by
Robert Parry (Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 July 1996
Reference
281 c51W; 35733
House
House of Commons

What representations have been made to the Government office on Merseyside by the Albert Dock Residents Association concerning their lease when the Merseyside Development Corporation is wound up.

Asked by
Robert Parry (Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 July 1996
Reference
34461; 280 c266W
House
House of Commons

If he will publish the clawback clauses included in the terms of the sale of the leases of properties by (a) the Albert Dock Company, (b) Barratt and (c) other companies within the Merseyside Development Corporation.

Asked by
Robert Parry (Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 July 1996
Reference
34487; 280 c267W
House
House of Commons

What representations he has received from residents of the Albert Dock concerning their future lease after the Merseyside Development Corporation ceases to exist.

Asked by
Robert Parry (Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 June 1996
Reference
280 c135W; 33925
House
House of Commons

Who owned the land in the area of the Albert Dock prior to the take over of the Development Corporation.

Asked by
Robert Parry (Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 June 1996
Reference
280 c135W; 33897
House
House of Commons

Debate on a motion to take note of the 40th and 42nd to 51st reports of the Public Accounts Committee in session 1994/95, and of Treasury Minutes and Northern Ireland Department of Finance and Personnel memoranda on these reports (Cm 2732, 2739, 2754, 2757, 2786, 2825, 2832, 2906, 2921, 2988,...

Lead member
Lord Sheldon
Answering member
Michael Shersby
Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on select committee reports
Date
23 October 1995
Reference
264 c716-67
House
House of Commons
Type
Unprinted papers
Date
18 July 1995
House
House of Commons
Notes
Received 23.03.95; TAGGED FOR DEBATE: CH 23.10.95
Date
22 March 1995
Reference
Cm 2786
House
House of Commons

If he will meet the creditors of the Merseyside Development Corporation; if he will provide for their claims for compensation from public funds.

Asked by
Lord Alton of Liverpool (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 January 1995
Reference
253 c465-6W
House
House of Commons

What considerations underlay the decision of his Parliamentary Under Secretary, the honourable Member for Croydon Central, to give a detailed reply to the honourable Member for Wallasey on 17th January, 252 Official Report, columns 411-2W, on the subject of the Merseyside Development Corporation rather than to wait until his Department...

Asked by
Lord Alton of Liverpool (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 January 1995
Reference
253 c309W
House
House of Commons

To comment on the future of the Merseyside Development Corporation.

Asked by
Robert Parry (Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 January 1995
Reference
252 c504W;252 c506W
House
House of Commons