Skip to main content

1-20 of 117 results for subject:"Middle Level Commissioners"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I would like to thank the hon. Member for Torbay (Kevin Foster) for a full and detailed description of the Lords amendments. Although his constituency, and mine in Plymouth, are some distance from the geographical area in focus, the legislation has important consequences for that locality, so it is right...

Member
Luke Pollard (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2018
Reference
647 cc607-9
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendment 1.

Member
Kevin Foster (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2018
Reference
647 c601
House
House of Commons

This debate marks the end of a detailed process of parliamentary scrutiny of the Bill, which has both been welcome and led to significant changes and improvements to it. That process has been followed tenaciously by my hon. Friend the Member for Christchurch (Sir Christopher Chope), who is in his...

Member
Kevin Foster (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2018
Reference
647 cc601-2
House
House of Commons

I am very conscious of what my hon. Friend says, and we want to encourage people to be active in their recreation. Have the commissioners considered a case whereby such vessels may be part of a commercial operation, with kayaks

being rented out or training taking place? Have they recognised...

Member
Baroness Coffey (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2018
Reference
647 c602
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for her intervention. Yes, that is partly why Lords amendment 7 allows an ability to provide some charge for a more commercial operation. It could perhaps be a block charge to British Canoeing for those who are using the waterway, so that people pay a membership...

Member
Kevin Foster (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2018
Reference
647 c603
House
House of Commons

Could I be quite clear about this, because I am slightly worried? There is no question, is there, of a family taking a canoe out having to pay when they go on these waterways? That would seem excessive.

Member
Bob Stewart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2018
Reference
647 c603
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. and gallant Friend for his intervention. The Lords amendment that I have just briefly covered is designed to deal with some of those concerns. It would be quite common on other waterways to have a system whereby if someone was a member of the British Canoeing...

Member
Kevin Foster (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2018
Reference
647 cc603-6
House
House of Commons

I am perplexed by the term “a relevant interest”. Will my hon. Friend elaborate on that, so that I can understand what a relevant interest might be?

Member
Eddie Hughes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2018
Reference
647 c606
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for his interest. The amendment responds directly to concerns raised by petitioners in the Lords Committee about how the commissioners would not be sufficiently accountable to navigation interests. It gives boat owners on the Middle Level the same right to scrutinise the commissioners’ navigation accounts,...

Member
Kevin Foster (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2018
Reference
647 cc606-7
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to participate in this debate on this very important Bill. I would first like to pay tribute to my hon. Friend the Member for Torbay (Kevin Foster), who volunteered to take it on. It has required a lot of work and effort. I want to put...

Member
Lord Bellingham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2018
Reference
647 cc609-610
House
House of Commons

Is it not good that we are having a debate about these amendments so that comments can be put on the record and people looking at the history of the Middle Level in future can say, “This is what these amendments were about.”? I am very grateful to my hon....

Member
Christopher Chope (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2018
Reference
647 cc610-1
House
House of Commons

It is a great privilege to contribute to the later stages of the Bill.

I am conscious that the Bill has been promoted by the Middle Level Commissioners. I am sure they will recognise the importance that Parliament attaches to scrutinising draft legislation that was not part of any party’s election...

Member
Baroness Coffey (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2018
Reference
647 cc611-2
House
House of Commons

Consideration of Lords amendments. Lords amendments 1 to 20 agreed to.

Lead member
Kevin Foster
Answering member
Baroness Coffey
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Debates on bills
Date
16 October 2018
Reference
647 cc601-612
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 October 2018
Reference
647 c607
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
Christopher Chope (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2018
Reference
636 c905
House
House of Commons

The background to new clause 1 is the principle of quid pro quo, because the petitioners are concerned that new charges and obligations are being brought in without their getting anything in return. Before I expand on that, I should say that all the new clauses and amendments are grouped...

Member
Christopher Chope (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2018
Reference
636 c905
House
House of Commons

indicated assent .

Member
Kevin Foster (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2018
Reference
636 c905
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for confirming that that is the situation. It would therefore be apposite for me to make a few introductory remarks by saying that I, the petitioners and others much appreciate how the Bill’s promoters have responded positively to many of the points that...

Member
Christopher Chope (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2018
Reference
636 cc905-6
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend will be aware that the Bill affects my constituency. Without the Middle Level Commissioners, we would not have many homes protected and many thousands of hectares of farmland would not be kept productive. Does he agree that the key point is that if navigation, locks and waterways...

Member
Lord Bellingham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2018
Reference
636 c906
House
House of Commons

I think the principle is that if the farmers—I know my hon. Friend has a significant interest in farming—are going to benefit from land drainage schemes, and this is essentially one mega land drainage scheme, I do not see why they should not have to pay for the benefit that...

Member
Christopher Chope (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2018
Reference
636 cc906-7
House
House of Commons