Skip to main content

1-20 of 112 results for subject:"Military Covenant Task Force"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords statement on the Armed Forces covenant.

Lead member
Lord Astor of Hever
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
727 c1179-91
House
House of Lords

Statement on the Armed Forces covenant.

Lead member
Liam Fox
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
528 c25-42
House
House of Commons

My Lords, with the leave of the House, I will now repeat a Statement made in the other place by my right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Defence. ““With permission, Mr Speaker, I should like to make a Statement on the Armed Forces covenant, which is being published...

Member
Lord Astor of Hever (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
727 c1179-82
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for repeating the Statement made in the other place by the Secretary of State for Defence and for the advance copies of the three reports on the Armed Forces covenant and the Statement itself. We of course endorse the Minister’s comments on the support...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
727 c1182-4
House
House of Lords

My hon. Friend makes a useful point. We have, of course, been trialling our new website and are looking at examinations at the point when personnel leave the armed forces. One issue that I failed to mention and ought to have done is the need to get better information to...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
528 c41-2
House
House of Commons

Today has been a great day for parliamentary scrutiny. We had an Armed Forces Bill before Parliament. We had a campaign by the Royal British Legion. We had MPs on both sides of the House concerned about the issue. We had a Secretary of State and a Prime Minister who...

Member
Peter Bone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
528 c42
House
House of Commons

As I said in my statement, we will bring forward Government amendments to put into effect what I have set out in my statement.

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
528 c42
House
House of Commons

I welcome my right hon. Friend's announcement of the practical measures to give effect to the armed forces covenant. Is he aware that such varied voices as those of the Adjutant-General, the deputy Chief of the Defence Staff, the Second Sea Lord and Bryn Parry of Help for Heroes all...

Member
Christopher Pincher (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
528 c40-1
House
House of Commons

Indeed I do; that is reflected in the balance we have set out today. There was something of a false debate between the Government and the service charities, especially the Royal British Legion, but they were always very clear that the outcome would be right for our armed forces. It...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
528 c41
House
House of Commons

What the Secretary of State has said today will be welcomed by many, particularly those in the Nelson and District branch of the Royal British Legion, whom he met and discussed the matter with when he last visited Pendle. Of particular concern to many is how the Government can help...

Member
Andrew Stephenson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
528 c41
House
House of Commons

For obvious reasons, I well remember that visit to Pendle. As I have said in response to earlier questions, we are looking at how we can best improve access to housing, in the public sector by looking at best practice across the country in conjunction with local government, and by...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
528 c41
House
House of Commons

I welcome my right hon. Friend's statement. Will he indicate his willingness to examine how compensation is paid to members of the armed forces who are injured? Currently, many of those who are badly injured and rightly receive many hundreds of thousands of pounds are at great risk of exploitation...

Member
John Glen (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
528 c40
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes a very interesting point. I will undertake to have some work begun in the Department to see where we are on that subject. It is obviously crucial for the long-term welfare of those who receive such payments that money is invested in a wise way that...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
528 c40
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State's congratulations to the Royal British Legion are well deserved, because it was its campaign more than anything else that forced this most welcome retreat by the Government. He will know that what wound the Royal British Legion up more than anything else was the attempt to...

Member
Bob Ainsworth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
528 c30
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend raises an important point, which we have grappled with in our approach to the covenant. The reason why equipment is not in the military covenant today is that the covenant for the welfare of our personnel involves a pact not just between the Government and the...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
528 c30
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the right hon. Gentleman for asking for clarification on that point, and I can give him this assurance, which, as he knows, I have given the House on a number of occasions. I have wanted to see a maximising of transparency on this, and I have...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
528 c30
House
House of Commons

Legality has to be a foregone conclusion in this House if we are to take our appropriate place in the international family of civilised nations. As to the Government's duty in sending our armed forces into combat, I would say that they have two clear duties: one is to ensure...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
528 c30-1
House
House of Commons

I understand my right hon. Friend's attempt to draw a distinction between Government and community obligation, but is not the Government's responsibility also a moral one? For that reason, should we not recognise that the Government have a duty not to expose our armed forces to unnecessary risk, always to...

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
528 c30
House
House of Commons

I particularly welcome the Secretary of State's announcement about three cycles of IVF for the injured when they come back. He will know that that is virtually the first thing that the young men who return to the Queen Elizabeth hospital from Afghanistan will ask about. He also mentioned prosthetics....

Member
Baroness Stuart of Edgbaston (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
528 c31
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for the welcome—the basic welcome—that the right hon. Gentleman has given. Yes, it is perfectly true that the Opposition raised some of the issues in a recent debate—except that they would not define what they meant, nor would they tell us what rights they might create or...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2011
Reference
528 c29
House
House of Commons