Skip to main content

1-20 of 68 results for subject:"Ministry of Defence Guard Service"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Further to my Hon. Friend’s statement of 8 September (HCWS913), I am providing a further update on the measures we continue to take to enhance and improve security across the Defence Estate.

As we set out previously, after many years of under-investment and hollowing out under the previous administration, we...

Member
Al Carns (Labour)
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written statements
Date
27 November 2025
Reference
HCWS1103
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Defence (Al Carns) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.

Further to my Hon. Friend’s statement of 8 September (HCWS913), I am providing a further update on the measures we continue to take to enhance and improve security across the Defence Estate.

...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written statements
Date
27 November 2025
Reference
HLWS1102
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to page 90 of the Strategic Defence Review 2025, what progress he has made on devising a strategy for the protection of critical national infrastructure by the (a) MOD Guard Service and (b) UK intelligence community.

Asked by
Ben Obese-Jecty (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 October 2025
Reference
79320
House
House of Commons

My Hon Friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Louise Sandher-Jones) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.

Further to the statement made by my Hon Friend, Luke Pollard MP, on Monday 23 June 2025, I wish to give an update on the MOD Security Review. The Strategic Defence Review (SDR) which...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written statements
Date
8 September 2025
Reference
HLWS912
House
House of Lords

Further to the statement made by my Hon Friend, Luke Pollard MP, on Monday 23 June 2025, I wish to give an update on the MOD Security Review. The Strategic Defence Review (SDR) which reported earlier this year identified defence sites, including RAF Brize Norton, as needing further investment. After...

Member
Louise Sandher-Jones (Labour)
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written statements
Date
8 September 2025
Reference
HCWS913
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, which Army Reserve Centres are envisaged to require armed guarding in Northern Ireland after 2028.

Asked by
Gregory Campbell (Democratic Unionist Party)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 January 2025
Reference
22883
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment his Department has made of the potential impact of standing down the Guard Force in Northern Ireland on the security of Army Reserve Centres; and what plans he has to support affected full-time reserve personnel.

Asked by
Alex Easton (Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 December 2024
Reference
17703
House
House of Commons

What recent assessment he has made of the potential impact of the Operational MGS Employment Contract on applications for promotion in the Ministry of Defence Guard Service.

Asked by
Sarah Dyke (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
20 November 2023
Reference
900165; 741 cc14-5
House
House of Commons

There is no evidence—[Interruption.]

Answered by
Andrew Murrison (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
20 November 2023
Reference
741 c14
House
House of Commons

There is no evidence that the operational MOD Guard Service employment contract has had a material bearing on workflow, recruitment and retention. However, it is not possible to conduct an accurate assessment of the impact that OMEC has had on applications from staff seeking promotion, because of the way applications are filed. That said, the MOD Guard Service is encouraged by the volume of applications received for vacancies through fair and open competition, no doubt encouraged by the fact that OMEC terms and conditions of service remain highly favourable when compared with private sector security companies.

Answered by
Andrew Murrison (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
20 November 2023
Reference
741 c15
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for his response but, respectfully, I do not find it sufficient. My constituent has provided more than a decade’s service within the Ministry of Defence Guard Service. He reports that he and his contemporaries are disincentivised to apply for promotion, because it would mean switching to the new OMEC contracts from their legacy contracts and an extra six hours’ work a week. Many are leaving. Will the Minister promise to investigate this issue thoroughly?

Asked by
Sarah Dyke (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
20 November 2023
Reference
741 c15
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the hon. Lady. The new way of working was passed through the trade union consultation process, of course, and in terms of pay, pension, leave and sickness benefits and working hours, the MOD Guard Service performs well, as I have said, against private security companies. That is why we appear to be recruiting and retaining well.

Answered by
Andrew Murrison (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
20 November 2023
Reference
741 c15
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 13 September 2021 to Question 45090, on Ministry of Defence Guard Service: Conditions of Employment, how many of the 20 applications were made by MGS staff seeking promotion.

Asked by
Jack Dromey (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 November 2021
Reference
79322
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 13 September 2021 to Question 45089, Ministry of Defence Guard Service: Conditions of Employment, whether a value-for-money analysis including the potential effect on staff (a) health, (b) safety, and (c) wellbeing was undertaken before the introduction of...

Asked by
Jack Dromey (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 November 2021
Reference
79321
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 13 September 2021 to Question 45089, Ministry of Defence Guard Service: Conditions of Employment, how much of the estimated £63 million savings over 10 years of the introduction of Operational MGS Employment Contracts is expected to be...

Asked by
Jack Dromey (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 November 2021
Reference
79320
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 13 September 2021 to Question 45088, Ministry of Defence Guard Service: Conditions of Employment, if he will place in the Library a redacted copy of any impact assessments made prior to the introduction of Operational MGS Employment...

Asked by
Jack Dromey (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 November 2021
Reference
79318
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 13 September 2021 to Question 45088, Ministry of Defence Guard Service: Conditions of Employment, if he will arrange for trade union representatives to have access to the OMEC impact assessments.

Asked by
Jack Dromey (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 November 2021
Reference
79319
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 13 September 2021 to Question 45090, Ministry of Defence Guard Service: Conditions of Employment, how many and what proportion of MGS staff on pre-OMEC contracts would experience a reduction in pay in the event that they were...

Asked by
Stephen Morgan (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 November 2021
Reference
75990
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 13 September 2021 to Question 45127, Ministry of Defence Guard Service: Working Hours, whether a fatigue risk management system is in place for MGS staff working (a) up to and (b) more than 48 hours in a...

Asked by
Stephen Morgan (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 November 2021
Reference
75996
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 13 September 2021 to Question 45127, Ministry of Defence Guard Service: Working Hours, if he will commit to ensuring that no member of MGS staff on OMEC contracts are required to work more than 48 hours in...

Asked by
Stephen Morgan (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 November 2021
Reference
75995
House
House of Commons