Skip to main content

1-20 of 47 results for subject:"National Association of Bookmakers"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Culture, Media and Sport Committee
Date
13 November 2007
Reference
HC 37-i 2007-08
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on the Draft Human Tissue and Embryos Bill
Date
6 June 2007
Reference
HC 630-ii 2006-07
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

Westminster Hall adjournment debate on betting in horse racing.

Lead member
Iain Duncan Smith
Answering member
Richard Caborn
Department
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c71-94WH
House
House of Commons

The Minister said that my constituent and the hon. Lady’s constituent have been to the courts, but the key point that I have made today is that the levy board and the NJPC simply perjured themselves in those court cases. They said that the lists were not available and that...

Member
Iain Duncan Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c93WH
House
House of Commons

This is important; I hope that the right hon. Gentleman takes note. The new regime provides an appropriate regulatory structure for on-course betting in Britain. The regime addresses the three objectives of the Act, which are to keep gambling fair, to keep it crime-free and to protect the vulnerable, particularly...

Member
Richard Caborn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c93WH
House
House of Commons

The Minister said that there is not enough time to go through all the detail of what has been said here today. When he reflects on the debate, will he consider having a cross-party meeting to discuss these matters in greater detail and to consider whether they need to be...

Member
Richard Younger-Ross (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c94WH
House
House of Commons

It is very serious to say that people have perjured themselves. If one makes those serious allegations, one has to make them stand up. The courts are there to make sure that matters stand up. We make the laws and they carry them out. That case has to be a...

Member
Richard Caborn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c93-4WH
House
House of Commons

I assure the hon. Gentleman that there has been dialogue with my officials and with the right hon. Member for Chingford and Woodford Green.

Member
Richard Caborn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c94WH
House
House of Commons

No.

Member
Iain Duncan Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c94WH
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman has met my officials.

Member
Richard Caborn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c94WH
House
House of Commons

Not since the report.

Member
Iain Duncan Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c94WH
House
House of Commons

Well, the right hon. Gentleman has met my officials several times. If a dialogue is needed, hon. Members can meet my officials or me before we have the discussion with the working group. That might not be a bad idea, but I assure hon. Members that this matter is extremely...

Member
Richard Caborn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c94WH
House
House of Commons

The facts are fundamentally wrong.

Member
Iain Duncan Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c94WH
House
House of Commons

The Minister ought to get from his officials a copy of the letter that Stevenson wrote in response to the report. He has denied all that and made it absolutely clear that he had nothing to do with that and that he did not know of any change to the...

Member
Iain Duncan Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c91WH
House
House of Commons

We are not going to resolve this issue in the debate. I will look into this matter with my officials. At the end of my speech I shall say how we think matters should proceed. I thank the right hon. Gentleman for referring to the important issue of money laundering....

Member
Richard Caborn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c92WH
House
House of Commons

I have given it.

Member
Iain Duncan Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c94WH
House
House of Commons

If the right hon. Gentleman has evidence of perjury in the courts—

Member
Richard Caborn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c94WH
House
House of Commons

That must be taken back to the courts.

Member
Richard Caborn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c94WH
House
House of Commons

What is the composition of the working group? I add my voice to that of the hon. Member for Teignbridge (Richard Younger-Ross), because many issues have not come up in the debate, such as the conduct of auctions, which the Minister brought up himself. Will they also fall within the...

Member
Celia Barlow (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c94WH
House
House of Commons

I am very sorry, Mr. Benton. All that I am saying, very clearly, is that if there is evidence of perjury in court, it must go back to the court. It is not my officials or the Government who should make a decision on that, but the courts.

Member
Richard Caborn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c94WH
House
House of Commons