Skip to main content

1-20 of 108 results for subject:"National Federation of SubPostmasters"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask His Majesty's Government what discussions they have had with the National Federation of SubPostmasters concerning the removal of DVLA services from Post Offices.

Asked by
Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 July 2023
Reference
HL9449
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, whether he has had discussions with the National Federation of Subpostmasters on pay.

Asked by
David Linden (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 October 2022
Reference
60008
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what assessment he has made of the extent to which the interests of sub-postmasters are being effectively represented by the National Federation of Subpostmastes in the current pay consultation.

Asked by
Anneliese Dodds (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 July 2021
Reference
26157
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of adding the National Association of Sub-Postmasters to his Department's industry group.

Asked by
Scott Mann (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 May 2020
Reference
42130
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered Horizon settlement and future governance of Post Office Ltd.

Innocent people jailed; individuals having their good name and livelihoods taken away from them; the full use of the state and its finances to persecute individuals. Those are all characteristics of a totalitarian or...

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2020
Reference
673 cc1224-5
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the right hon. Gentleman on securing this important debate. Is not the other scandal in this that the courts time and again failed the victims? In the prosecutions that were taken forward by the Post Office, the courts found in favour of the Post Office, despite it being...

Member
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2020
Reference
673 c1225
House
House of Commons

I will come back to that, which is something that I think my hon. Friend the Member for Kingston upon Hull East (Karl Turner) will refer to in his contribution.

The board minutes from 1999 show that the Post Office knew there were bugs in the system and software problems. It...

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2020
Reference
673 c1225
House
House of Commons

It has also come to light that the people who were fixing the system from behind the scenes, as the right hon. Gentleman mentioned, and who could go in and balance the tills as it were, were incentivised and paid to be speedy and quickly fix the issues, which made...

Member
Duncan Baker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2020
Reference
673 c1225
House
House of Commons

It was even worse than that: for many years the Post Office denied that that could ever be done. It was only in 2011, after campaigning by me and others,

that the Post Office had the forensic accountants Second Sight take a look, and it discovered exactly what the hon....

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2020
Reference
673 cc1225-6
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend is outlining a litany of maladministration at the very least. Have any individuals at management level in either at Post Office Ltd or Fujitsu ever been held accountable for this?

Member
Lord Spellar (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2020
Reference
673 c1226
House
House of Commons

I shall come to that, which is a very good point. The complete opposite: most have been promoted or, in one case, appointed as a Government adviser when she left the Post Office.

That denial then led the postmasters to get the group action together, with 555 taking the Post Office...

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2020
Reference
673 c1226
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the right hon. Gentleman on his excellent speech and his stoical determination in trying to get to the bottom of this. Is he also aware that the head of Fujitsu UK is now working in the Cabinet Office?

Member
Lucy Allan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2020
Reference
673 c1227
House
House of Commons

Maybe she fulfils the role of the Pharisee in that parable. Does this not also speak to a deeper problem in our society, where relentlessly, time after time, the great and the good look after each other and hand out these positions to each other, irrespective of whether they have...

Member
Lord Spellar (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2020
Reference
673 c1227
House
House of Commons

It is, but how could somebody be given a CBE when this scandal was out there? How could somebody be appointed to the non-executive board of the Cabinet Office and a healthcare trust, given what is coming out of this court case? I find that remarkable.

Then there is the role...

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2020
Reference
673 cc1227-8
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend is making an excellent case. I want to raise with him this issue about MPs not being able to find out what happened. In the Hillsborough inquiry, the Bishop of Liverpool talked about

“The patronising disposition of unaccountable power”.

This is a classic case of exactly that.

I also...

Member
Diana Johnson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2020
Reference
673 c1228
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for that. She uses a great description.

We then come on to the issue of compensation.

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2020
Reference
673 c1228
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman mentioned the issue of Ministers. Of course the Post Office has a non-executive director appointed by the Government. One must assume that that non-executive director is reporting to Ministers. Would that not be an interesting topic for the inquiry?

Member
David Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2020
Reference
673 c1228
House
House of Commons

Yes, and I was going come on to that, because I would love to know who those non-executive directors have been over the years and what they said to Ministers. If I had been the Minister, I would have had that person in and scrutinised what was going on, as...

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2020
Reference
673 cc1228-1230
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2020
Reference
673 c1230
House
House of Commons

I will try to complete my contribution in even less than five or six minutes, Madam Deputy Speaker.

The right hon. Member for North Durham (Mr Jones) has given a comprehensive explanation of the background to this case, and many of us taking part in this debate will be familiar with...

Member
Martin Vickers (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2020
Reference
673 cc1230-1
House
House of Commons