1-20 of 25 results for subject:"Naval Manning Agency"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.251 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.002 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Naval Manning Agency"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Naval Manning Agency" OR subject_ses:57979
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how much of its personnel budget for each financial year since 1997-98 the Naval Manning Agency spent in Scotland (a) in monetary terms and (b) as a percentage of the total personnel budget for that year; how many personnel were employed in...
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how much of its personnel budget for each financial year since 1997-98 the Naval Manning Agency spent in Scotland (a) in monetary terms and (b) as a percentage of the total personnel budget for that year; how many personnel were employed in...
Asked by
Angus Robertson
(Scottish National Party)
Answered by
Ivor Caplin
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
3 February 2005
For answer on
4 April 2005
Answered on
4 April 2005
Angus Robertson: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much of its personnel budget for each financial year since 1997-98
the Naval Manning Agency spent in Scotland (a) in monetary terms and (b) as a percentage of the total personnel budget
for that year; how many personnel were employed in Scotland in each case; and if he will make a statement. [215433]
Mr. Caplin: Both Civilian and Service personnel data by Agency are collated annually at 1 April and presented in Table 2.6 of
the United Kingdom Defence Statistics, a copy of which is held in the Library of the House. Further information on personnel figures
is available on the DASA website at www.dasa.mod.uk
The number of Service personnel employed by Agency and location is not collated centrally. However, locally held records were
available and have been included in the following table.
A table showing numbers of Civilian personnel by MOD Agency, for the Agency as a total and those employed in Scotland specifically,
for the period 1 April 1997 to 1 January 2005, has also been published on the Defence Analytical Services Agency
website, www.dasa.mod.uk, and is also lodged in the Library of the House. However, no civilian staff were employed in Scotland by
the Naval Manning Agency.
The information asked for is shown in the following table. The NMA ceased to be an agency on 31 March 2004.
Personnel employed in Scotland by the Naval Manning Agency from April 1997 to March 2004
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Monetary value (£ million) Number Percentage of total spend on
Naval Manning Agency personnel
1997-98 0 0 0
1998-99 0 0 0
1999-2000 0 0 0
2000-01 0.067 less than 5 0.59
2001-02 0.085 less than 5 0.66
2002-03 0.097 less than 5 0.69
2003-04 0.105 less than 5 0.74
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Subjects
Executive agencies; Expenditure; Staff; Scotland; Defence agencies; Naval Manning Agency
Date
4 April 2005
Reference
432 c1107W; 215433
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers
Author
Naval Manning Agency
Laid on
20 July 2004
Notes
Received 30.09.04
Subjects
Executive agencies; Staff; Navy; Standards; Marines; Naval Manning Agency
Commons Library location
CS 336;Research IA DEF/AG/NMA/AR/2003-04
Date
20 July 2004
Reference
HC 794 2003/04
House
House of Commons
Lords Written Statement on the service personnel process review and the ceasing of agency status for the three single service personnel agencies (Naval Manning, Army Personnel and RAF Personnel Management Agency). (Inc ref to 17 July 2002 CH 389 c277-8W).
Lords Written Statement on the service personnel process review and the ceasing of agency status for the three single service personnel agencies (Naval Manning, Army Personnel and RAF Personnel Management Agency). (Inc ref to 17 July 2002 CH 389 c277-8W).
Member
Lord Bach
(Labour)
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written statements
Subjects
Armed forces; Executive agencies; Recruitment; Personnel management; Reviews; RAF Personnel Management Agency; Army Personnel Centre; Naval Manning Agency
Date
18 March 2004
Reference
659 c26WS
House
House of Lords
Written Statement on the service personnel process review and the ceasing of agency status for the three single service personnel agencies (Naval Manning, Army Personnel and RAF Personnel Management Agency). (Inc ref to 17 July 2002 389 c277-8W).
Written Statement on the service personnel process review and the ceasing of agency status for the three single service personnel agencies (Naval Manning, Army Personnel and RAF Personnel Management Agency). (Inc ref to 17 July 2002 389 c277-8W).
Member
Ivor Caplin
(Labour)
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written statements
Subjects
Armed forces; Executive agencies; Recruitment; Personnel management; Reviews; RAF Personnel Management Agency; Army Personnel Centre; Naval Manning Agency
Date
17 March 2004
Reference
419 c24WS
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers
Author
Naval Manning Agency
Laid on
16 July 2003
Notes
Received 15.10.03
Subjects
Executive agencies; Staff; Navy; Standards; Marines; Naval Manning Agency
Commons Library location
CS 336
Date
16 July 2003
Reference
HC 888 2002/03
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will place copies of the Naval Manning Agency's annual reports for 2000-01 and 2001-02 in the Library. - Including fact that copies are routinely placed in Library.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will place copies of the Naval Manning Agency's annual reports for 2000-01 and 2001-02 in the Library. - Including fact that copies are routinely placed in Library.
Asked by
Bernard Jenkin
(Conservative)
Answered by
Ivor Caplin
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
11 June 2003
For answer on
18 June 2003
Answered on
18 June 2003
Mr. Jenkin: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will place copies of the Naval Manning Agency's annual reports for
2000-01 and 2001-02 in the Library. [119627]
Mr. Caplin: Copies of the Naval Manning Agency's annual reports are routinely placed in the Libraries of both Houses. The 2001-02
report was available in the Library of the House on 10 October 2002.
Subjects
Annual reports; Naval Manning Agency
Date
18 June 2003
Reference
407 c250W; 119627
House
House of Commons
Lords statement on What key targets have been set for the chief executive of the Naval Manning Agency for the financial year 2003-04. [HL 3017[. - Includes figures.
Lords statement on What key targets have been set for the chief executive of the Naval Manning Agency for the financial year 2003-04. [HL 3017[. - Includes figures.
Asked by
Lord Brookman
(Labour)
Answered by
Lord Bach
(Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
22 May 2003
Answered on
22 May 2003
Subjects
Career development; Housing; Staff; Navy; Standards; Naval Manning Agency
Date
22 May 2003
Reference
648 c101WA
House
House of Lords
Written Statement on Naval Manning Agency key targets 2003/04. (Inc figs).
Written Statement on Naval Manning Agency key targets 2003/04. (Inc figs).
Member
Lord Moonie
(Labour)
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written statements
Subjects
Career development; Housing; Staff; Navy; Standards; Naval Manning Agency
Date
22 May 2003
Reference
405 c43-4WS
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers
Author
Naval Manning Agency
Laid on
23 July 2002
Notes
Received 30.07.02
Subjects
Executive agencies; Staff; Navy; Standards; Marines; Naval Manning Agency
Commons Library location
CS 336
Date
23 July 2002
Reference
HC 1030 2001/02
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what performance targets have been set for the Naval Manning Agency for the financial year 2002-03.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what performance targets have been set for the Naval Manning Agency for the financial year 2002-03.
Asked by
Karen Buck
(Labour)
Answered by
Adam Ingram
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
11 April 2002
For answer on
15 April 2002
Answered on
15 April 2002
Ms Buck: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what performance targets have been set for the Naval Manning Agency for the
financial year 2002-03. [49906]
Mr. Ingram: The key targets that have been set for the chief executive of the Naval Manning Agency for the financial year 2002-03
are as listed. The targets build upon progress made by the agency since it formed on 1 July 1996.
Key Target 1. Deployment:
The percentage of filled officer billets to be: 94 per cent. or greater. The percentage of filled rating billets to be: 90 per cent.
or greater. The percentage of filled other rank billets to be: 90 per cent or greater.
Key Target 2. Manpower Planning:
The variation of strength to requirement to be: Better than -4 per cent.
Key Target 3. Career Management:
The percentage of officers receiving the required notice of change to be: 60 per cent. or greater. The percentage of ratings
receiving the required notice of change to be: 98 per cent. or greater. The number of occurrences where minimum time ashore criteria
are met to be: 99 per cent. or greater.
Key Target 4. NMA Corporate Efficiency:
To achieve strict control of NMA manpower overheads to within plus or minus 2 per cent. of the baseline established for manpower
overheads as at 1 April 2002. To carry out two benchmarking exercises. To achieve a customer confidence score of 63.
Key Target 5. Financial:
To operate the NMA within 0 to -1 per cent. of its 2001-02 net cash allocation for operating activities. Production of annual
accrual accounts to be completed by July 2003.
Subjects
Standards; Naval Manning Agency
Date
15 April 2002
Reference
383 c714W;383 c712W; 49906
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what plans there are for the conduct of quinquennial reviews of the three services manning agencies.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what plans there are for the conduct of quinquennial reviews of the three services manning agencies.
Asked by
Mark Hendrick
(Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answered by
Adam Ingram
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
19 July 2001
For answer on
20 July 2001
Answered on
20 July 2001
Subjects
Armed forces; Air force; Personnel management; Training; Reviews; RAF Personnel Management Agency; Army Personnel Centre; Naval Manning Agency
Date
20 July 2001
Reference
6457; 372 c710-1W
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers
Author
Naval Manning Agency
Laid on
19 July 2001
Subjects
Executive agencies; Staff; Navy; Standards; Marines; Naval Manning Agency
Commons Library location
CS 336
Date
19 July 2001
Reference
HC 142 2001/02
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what performance targets have been set for the Naval Manning Agency for 2001-02. - Inc figures.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what performance targets have been set for the Naval Manning Agency for 2001-02. - Inc figures.
Asked by
Lord Coaker
(Labour)
Answered by
Lord Spellar
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
9 April 2001
For answer on
10 April 2001
Answered on
10 April 2001
Mr. Coaker: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what performance targets have been set for the Naval Manning Agency for
2001-02. [158296]
Mr. Spellar: The Key Targets that have been set for the Chief Executive of the Naval Manning Agency for the financial year 2001-02
are set out. The targets build upon progress made by the Agency since it formed on 1 July 1996.
Deployment:
(a) The percentage of filled Officer billets to be--94 per cent. or greater.
(b) The percentage of filled rating billets to be--92 per cent. or greater.
(c) The percentage of filled other rank billets to be--90 per cent. or greater.
Manpower Planning:
The variation of strength to requirement to be--between plus 1/2 and minus 2 per cent.
Career Management:
(a) The percentage of Officers receiving the required Notice of Change to be--60 per cent. or greater.
(b) The percentage of ratings receiving the required Notice of Change to be--98 per cent. or greater.
(c) the number of occurrences where Minimum Time Ashore criteria are met to be--99 per cent. or greater.
NMA Corporate Efficiency:
(a) To achieve strict control of NMA manpower overheads to within plus or minus 2 per cent. of the baseline established for manpower
overheads as at 1 April 2000.
(b) To carry out two benchmarking exercises.
(c) To achieve a Customer Confidence Score of 63.
Financial:
(a) To operate the NMA within zero to minus 1 per cent. of its 2001-02 Net Cash-Allocation for Operating Activities.
(b) Production of Annual Accrual Accounts to be completed by July 2002.
Subjects
Standards; Naval Manning Agency
Date
10 April 2001
Reference
158296; 366 c519-20W
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers
Author
Naval Manning Agency
Laid on
25 January 2001
Subjects
Executive agencies; Staff; Navy; Standards; Marines; Naval Manning Agency
Commons Library location
CS 336;Research IA DEF/AG/NMA/AR
Date
25 January 2001
Reference
HC 125 2000/01
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what key targets have been set for the Naval Manning Agency for 2000-01. - Inc figures.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what key targets have been set for the Naval Manning Agency for 2000-01. - Inc figures.
Asked by
Andy King
(Labour)
Answered by
Lord Spellar
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
5 April 2000
For answer on
6 April 2000
Answered on
6 April 2000
Mr. Andy King: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what key targets have been set for the Naval Manning Agency for 2000-01.
[118376]
Mr. Spellar: The Key Targets that have been set for the Chief Executive of the Naval Manning Agency (NMA) for the financial year
2000-01 are as set out. The targets build upon progress made by the Agency since it formed on 1 July 1996.
1. Deployment:
a. The percentage of filled Officer billets to be: 94 per cent. or greater.
b. The percentage of filled rating billets to be: 91 per cent. or greater.
c. The percentage of filled other rank billets to be: 88 per cent. or greater.
2. Manpower Planning: The variation of Strength to Requirement to be: between zero and minus 2 per cent.
3. Career Management:
a. The percentage of Officers receiving the required Notice of Change to be: 60 per cent. greater.
b. The percentage of ratings receiving the required Notice of Change to be: 98 per cent. or greater.
c. The number of occurrences where Minimum Time Ashore criteria are met to be: 99 per cent. greater.
4. NMA Corporate Efficiency:
a. To achieve strict control of NMA manpower overheads to within plus or minus 2 per cent. of the baseline established for manpower
overheads as at 1 April 2000.
b. To carry out two Benchmarking Exercises.
c. To achieve a Customer Confidence Score of 62.
5. Financial
a. Production of Annual Accrual Accounts to be completed by September 01.
b. To operate the NMA within its 2000-01 Net Cash Allocation for Operating Activities (at 1999-2000 prices) of £164.8 million.
Subjects
Standards; Naval Manning Agency
Date
6 April 2000
Reference
118376; 347 c551-2W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will list (a) those targets of the Naval Manning agency for 1998-99 which (i) were and (ii) were not achieved, giving the factors affecting the outcome in each case and (b) action taken by the agency to improve target achievement...
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will list (a) those targets of the Naval Manning agency for 1998-99 which (i) were and (ii) were not achieved, giving the factors affecting the outcome in each case and (b) action taken by the agency to improve target achievement...
Asked by
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Lord Moonie
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
21 February 2000
For answer on
6 March 2000
Answered on
6 March 2000
Mr. Menzies Campbell: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list (a) those targets of the Naval Manning agency for
1998-99 which (i) were and (ii) were not achieved, giving the factors affecting the outcome in each case and (b) action taken by the
agency to improve target achievement performance in 1999-2000; and if he will make a statement. [111761]
Dr. Moonie: This is a matter for the Chief Executive of the Naval Manning Agency. I have asked the Chief Executive to write to the
right hon. and learned Member.
Letter from Jeremy de Halpert to Mr. Menzies Campbell dated 6 March 2000:
In your recent Parliamentary Question, you sought a range of information concerning the targets placed upon the Naval Management
Agency (NMA) for 1998-99. You also asked what action the Agency had taken to improve performance against its targets in 1990-00. I
have been asked to reply as the Chief Executive of the NMA.
The information you requested is attached to this letter. Details of NMA's performance against its targets will be published shortly
in the Agency's Annual Report and Accounts for 1998-99. I will arrange for a copy of the Report to be sent to you as soon as it is
available.
I hope this is helpful.
Naval Manning Agency--Performance Against Targets--1998-99
Deployment Filled Officer Billets: Target: Greater than 94%--Met Achieved: 94.2%
Overall performance continued to be satisfactory. A similar outturn to last year has been achieved despite a more difficult manning
climate that has seen a deterioration in the balance of the Office Strength to Requirement. The RN was 280 Officers short of its
requirement as at 1 February 1999 compared to 149 Officers on 1 April 1998. Filled Rating/Other Rank Billets Targets: Ratings:
greater than 89%--Not met Royal Marines Other Ranks greater than 88%--Not met Achieved: Ratings: 87.4% Royal Marines Other Ranks
85.3%
The NMA's performance is little changed from last year (88% and 85.1% respectively) and should be viewed in the light of the
difficulties faced by the recruiting Agency in 1998-99 in meeting requested gains to the trained strength.
In year, a defining balance of Strength to Requirement was evident for Royal Navy Ratings and Royal Marines Other Ranks but the rate
of decline has now been arrested. This has been achieved through a combination of close monitoring of gains to the trained strength
and Premature Voluntary Release figures and greater accuracy in the forecasting and monitoring of demographic trends. This work is
being developed during 1990-00. The introduction of the five year second open engagement (20E(5), to complement the existing ten
year 20E, has also provided the Agency with added flexibility in its manpower management.
Manpower Planning Variation of Strength to Requirement Target: Plus 1% to Minus 2%--Not met Achieved: Minus 3.3%
This figure is calculated on the basis of a 3-year running average. This reporting method takes into consideration an element of the
lag between planning decisions and the consequent inflow of trained manpower and provides a more effective and accurate measure of
the NMA's planning performance than an in year 12 month running average.
The NMA's Owner has reduced the upper level of the target for 1999-00 form 11% to zero to reflect the manning difficulties
encountered in 1998-99 and ensure that the aim is directed at meeting future manpower requirements without over-providing.
Career Management Percentage of Officers receiving the required Notice of Move {2} Target: Greater than 60%--Met Achieved: 67.6%
The disparity between this target and that for ratings/other ranks reflects the ability of Officers to negotiate their next career
move directly with their Appointing Officer Percentage of Ratings/Other Ranks receiving the required Notice of Move {2} Target:
Greater than 98%--Met Achieved: 99.5% The continuing imbalance between Strength and Requirement has made the achievement of this
target particularly challenging Percentage drafts where Minimum Time Ashore (MTA) {3} criteria are met Target: 99%--Met Achieved:
99.9% While the NMA has met this target, the difficult manpower supply climate has led to a growth in the number of personnel
nearing the MTA criteria
Efficiency Numeric Reduction in Gapping Target: 7.5% reduction in gapping--Not met Achieved: 7%
The high degree of deploying turbulence and recruiting difficulties experienced in 1998-99 limited the scope for reducing the level
of gapping. Earlier efficiencies in the utilisation of the manning margin have also reduced the potential for further savings. To
reflect these factors, the Agency's target for the coming year has been adjusted to 5%.
The NMA successfully introduced its Customer Review process in summer 1998. This has helped the Agency to develop its understanding
of the issues, besides gapping, that are of concern to its customers. The process has also led to several changes in the way the
Agency operates, especially in terms of its external communication and data presentation. The NMA is confident that this will be
reflected in the results obtained from the Review, which commenced in April 1999. Additionally, it is intended that the European
Foundation Quality Management Model should be introduced into the Agency. This will ensure that NMA continues to develop along the
most effective lines and that its performance reflects best practice.
Benchmarking Exercises Target: Two exercises--Met Achieved: Two exercises The NMA's Customer Review Process was the list of these
exercises. The second exercise was conducted with the RAF.
Financial Production of Accounts Target: To produce Accounts for Period from April 99 to March 99--Met Achieved: Accounts laid in
January 2000. Comment: None
{1} Within four months of change of their employment
{2} Less than three months for shore service and five months for sea service
{3} The Minimum Time Ashore criterion is a Personnel Management Standard that aims to ensure a reasonable amount of time ashore
between sea-going drafts. It differs between Rates and length of Service in a sea draft and is not applicable to Officers.
Subjects
Standards; Naval Manning Agency
Date
6 March 2000
Reference
345 c493-5W; 111761
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers
Author
Naval Manning Agency
Laid on
27 January 2000
Subjects
Executive agencies; Staff; Navy; Standards; Marines; Naval Manning Agency
Commons Library location
CS 336
Date
27 January 2000
Reference
HC 156 1999/2000
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what key targets have been set for the Naval Manning Agency for financial year 1999-2000.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what key targets have been set for the Naval Manning Agency for financial year 1999-2000.
Asked by
Linda Perham
(Labour)
Answered by
Doug Henderson
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
20 May 1999
For answer on
21 May 1999
Answered on
21 May 1999
Ms Perham: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what key targets have been set for the Naval Manning Agency for the financial
year 1999-2000. [85301]
Mr. Doug Henderson: Key Targets have been set for the Chief Executive of the Naval Manning Agency for the financial year 1999-2000.
The targets build upon progress made by the Agency since it formed on 1 July 1996 and are as follows:
Key Target 1
a. The percentage of filled Officer billets to be 94 per cent. or greater.
b. The percentage of filled rating billets to be 90 per cent. or greater.
c. The percentage of filled other rank billets to be 88 per cent. or greater.
Key Target 2 The variation of Strength to Requirement to be between zero and minus 2 per cent.
Key Target 3
a. The percentage of Officers receiving the required Notice of Change to be 60 per cent. or greater.
b. The percentage of ratings receiving the required Notice of Change to be 98 per cent. or greater.
c. The number of occurrences where Minimum Time Ashore criteria are met to be 99 per cent. or greater.
Key Target 4
a. To achieve a 5 per cent. reduction in NMA manpower overheads.
b. To carry out 2 Benchmarking Exercises.
c. To achieve a Customer Confidence Score of 60.
Key Target 5
a. Production of Annual Accrual Accounts to be completed by April 2000.
b. To operate the NMA within its 1999-2000 Net Cash Allocation for Operating Activities (at 1998-99 prices) of £10.883 million, a
reduction of 3.1 per cent. after specific, additional in-year commitments have been discounted.
Subjects
Standards; Naval Manning Agency
Date
21 May 1999
Reference
85301; 331 c460-1W;331 c459-61W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many people are currently employed by the Naval Manning Agency; what was the figure at its inception; on what date the Naval Manning Agency published its report for 1997-98; and what was the cost of production of the report. - Including...
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many people are currently employed by the Naval Manning Agency; what was the figure at its inception; on what date the Naval Manning Agency published its report for 1997-98; and what was the cost of production of the report. - Including...
Asked by
Mike Hancock
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Doug Henderson
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
10 March 1999
For answer on
29 March 1999
Answered on
29 March 1999
Mr. Hancock: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many people are currently employed by the Naval Manning Agency; what was
the figure at its inception; on what date the Naval Manning Agency published its report for 1997-98; and what was the cost of
production of the report. [76895]
Mr. Doug Henderson: This is a matter for the Chief Executive of the Naval Manning Agency. I have asked the Chief Executive to write
to the hon. Member.
Letter from Rear Admiral J. M. de Halpert to Mr. Mike Hancock, dated 29 March 1999:
I am replying to your questions to the Secretary of State about the number of people employed in the Naval Manning Agency and the
costs of publication of the Agency's 1997-98 Report, as these matters fall within my area of responsibility as Chief Executive of
the Naval manning Agency.
The Agency currently employs 278 people including four part-time personnel. On Vesting Day (1 July 1996) the Agency employed 292
personnel.
The proof copy of the Agency's 1997-98 Annual Report and Accounts was produced on 28 January 1999, and a copy has been placed in the
Library of the House. The final version of the Report is currently with the printers and should be published in April. The cost is
expected to be similar to last year's at around £1,600.
I hope you find this helpful.
Subjects
Costs; Annual reports; Publications; Staff; Naval Manning Agency
Date
29 March 1999
Reference
76895; 328 c482-3W
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers
Author
Naval Manning Agency
Laid on
28 January 1999
Notes
Received 22.11.99
Subjects
Executive agencies; Staff; Personnel management; Navy; Standards; Marines; Defence agencies; Naval Manning Agency
Commons Library location
CS 336
Date
28 January 1999
Reference
HC 175 1998/99
House
House of Commons