Skip to main content

1-20 of 163 results for subject:"Navigational aids"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Date
13 September 2023
Reference
CP 940
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, if he will make it his policy to bring forward legislative proposals to prevent the siting of seabed fishing equipment in any location within 300 metres of a navigational mark.

Asked by
Matthew Offord (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 June 2022
Reference
11655
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty's Government which UK airports that operate scheduled flights have operational instrument landing systems, either using (1) Global Navigation Satellite System, or (2) land based Instrument Landing Systems; and which have neither system.

Asked by
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 January 2022
Reference
HL5291
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government which heliports operating scheduled flights have Point in Space approach navigation aids.

Asked by
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 January 2022
Reference
HL5292
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Vere of Norbiton on 15 January (HL11793), what assessment they have made of the resilience of UK merchant ships’ ability to receive position, navigation and timing data in the event of a failure of satellite provision.

Asked by
Lord West of Spithead (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 February 2021
Reference
HL12745
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Randerson

1: Clause 2, page 2, line 8, leave out paragraph (c)

Member’s explanatory statement

This is a probing amendment to clarify who may be covered by “another person with functions relating to air navigation” with regard to who is able to prepare and submit airspace change proposals.

Member
Baroness Randerson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2020
Reference
801 c2075
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the support on these Benches for the principles of this Bill should come as no surprise to anyone in this House or the aviation industry. Several previous attempts have been made by the Government to introduce a Bill along these lines, but they have been interrupted by general...

Member
Baroness Randerson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2020
Reference
801 cc2076-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 1, moved by the noble Baroness, Lady Randerson, seeks to clarify the phrase in Clause 2(2)(c)

“another person with functions relating to air navigation.”

I shall start by addressing that phrase and then move on to the other parts of airspace modernisation and how the powers to which it...

Member
Baroness Vere of Norbiton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2020
Reference
801 cc2077-8
House
House of Lords

I am very interested in what the Minister said about who might be involved in seeking changes. Yes, it could be done to help a small airport to get better access to its flights or controls, but it could be done to keep someone away. In other words, it could...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2020
Reference
801 c2078
House
House of Lords

I think we will get into the detail of how airspace change proposals work in the next group of amendments. It is the case that there is a master plan that is overarching—I think hand gestures are needed to describe this—and covers the whole of the south of the country....

Member
Baroness Vere of Norbiton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2020
Reference
801 c2078
House
House of Lords

Section 70.

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2020
Reference
801 c2078
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord has just corrected me that it is Section 70, and he is absolutely right.

Within all this, it is the CAA that will ensure that airspace change proposals are appropriate. It is not the case that one airport will be capable of coming along to try to duff...

Member
Baroness Vere of Norbiton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2020
Reference
801 cc2078-9
House
House of Lords

Can my noble friend confirm that the words of paragraph (c),

“another person with functions relating to air navigation”,

also include the Ministry of Defence?

Member
Lord Trefgarne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2020
Reference
801 c2079
House
House of Lords

My noble friend is right. It may well include the Ministry of Defence, although I would expect that department to fall under the airports section because if it was putting forward airspace changes, as I believe it will be doing for RAF Northolt, it will be the sponsor in that...

Member
Baroness Vere of Norbiton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2020
Reference
801 c2079
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for that response, and I will read her words carefully before Report. I am of course aware that this kind of phrase is a delightful catch-all, which Governments like to put in legislation in case some organisation crops up at a later stage that they have...

Member
Baroness Randerson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2020
Reference
801 c2079
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Randerson

2: Clause 2, page 2, leave out line 13 and insert “master plan for airspace modernisation, as set out in Civil Aviation Publication 1711 and Civil Aviation Publication 1711b.”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment would narrow the powers given to the Secretary of State to ensure they are being used...

Member
Baroness Randerson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2020
Reference
801 c2080
House
House of Lords

This group of amendments, of which we have put forward three, relates once again to clarifying exactly what the Government seek to do. Amendment 2 relates to narrowing the powers of the Secretary of State to make sure that they are used only for

“the delivery of the master plan for...

Member
Baroness Randerson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2020
Reference
801 c2080
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I disagree with Amendment 2 because narrowing the Secretary of State’s powers would not be desirable. I know that the powers under discussion relate directly to the modernisation programme, but they should be maintained permanently regarding the control of airspace. The CAA is not a good place for...

Member
Lord Kirkhope of Harrogate (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2020
Reference
801 c2081
House
House of Lords

My Lords, for the convenience of the House, I draw attention to the penultimate line on the front page of today’s list, which states that the target for the day is to complete Amendment 23. That means that we are not going to do drones today. No Member has moved...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2020
Reference
801 cc2081-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I first pick up the question that the noble Lord, Lord Tunnicliffe, started with, which is whether we shall end at the target of Amendment 23. My understanding is that we shall, because that has been agreed through the usual channels. Amendment 24 is in my name, so...

Member
Lord Craig of Radley (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2020
Reference
801 c2082
House
House of Lords