Skip to main content

1-20 of 34 results for subject:"Nuffield Council on Bioethics"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

This briefing provides an overview of the regulation of non-surgical cosmetic procedures in England.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
10 September 2025
Reference
CBP-10331
Type
Briefing papers on bills
Date
10 March 2021
Reference
CBP-9032

To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the report by the Nuffield Council on Bioethics Ethical considerations in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, published on 17 March; and what discussions they have had with National Health Service leaders about that report.

Asked by
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 April 2020
Reference
HL2777
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, in the light of a statement on the Guardian website on 31 October that an article on the approval of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) had to be amended to correct a statement that the Nuffield Council on Bioethics had confirmed in July that no new...

Asked by
Lord Shinkwin (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2016
Reference
HL3678
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Prior of Brampton on 22 November (HL3127), how the UK National Screening Committee, in making its recommendation on 15 January that non-invasive prenatal testing be approved, formally considered the write up from the roundtable discussion held by the...

Asked by
Lord Shinkwin (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 December 2016
Reference
HL3715
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government when they expect the assessment by the Nuffield Centre for Bioethics of the ethical implications of the introduction of the new non-invasive prenatal test to be completed.

Asked by
Lord Shinkwin (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 December 2016
Reference
HL3716
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what the timetable is for the Nuffield Council for BioEthics to report to his Department on the non-invasive pre-natal test for Down's syndrome.

Asked by
Lord Vaizey of Didcot (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 December 2016
Reference
55835
House
House of Commons
The noble Baroness raises another important point. The Disability Discrimination Act says that shops and other places where anybody with a disability might go should be friendly for their use. Part of the problem is ignorance about this. We are launching a public awareness campaign about dementia in the new year.
Answered by
Baroness Thornton (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
2 December 2009
Reference
715 c735-6
House
House of Lords
I thought that that was also an important part of the report. The report points to, for example, filling in a pond in a care home, which had given enormous pleasure to people, because of the risk. The noble Baroness is absolutely right. Overall, the Government are taking this report very seriously indeed. It has messages not just for us and how we deal with the dementia strategy but for all professionals and people who are dealing with people with dementia.
Answered by
Baroness Thornton (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
2 December 2009
Reference
715 c735
House
House of Lords
Does the Minister agree that it is important that people should be able to make decisions in advance? None of us knows who is going to develop dementia; it can occur in anyone. In particular, people should be able to make decisions about their own future while they are still able to do so, or even decisions as to whether they would want to take part in a research project if they develop dementia.
Asked by
Baroness Gardner of Parkes (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 December 2009
Reference
715 c734
House
House of Lords
My Lords, does the Minister agree with the Nuffield report that, instead of the risk assessments that are made in care services on a regular basis, we should be looking toward risk-and-benefit assessments, so that people with dementia get some chance to practise everyday activities? In Holland, for example, they do things such as making their own beds, instead of being told that it is unsafe, which is the British practice.
Asked by
Baroness Neuberger (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 December 2009
Reference
715 c735
House
House of Lords
The report refers to many of those decisions. The person who is caring for the person with dementia is best placed to take those decisions, but they need support in that. Proper education and training for professionals and carers have been identified as something that we need to address; we need to look at where there are gaps, which indeed there are, and we need to make sure that this is one of our priorities.
Answered by
Baroness Thornton (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
2 December 2009
Reference
715 c734
House
House of Lords
My Lords, does the Minister agree that dementia is an illness, not a social malaise, and that the levels of support available for those suffering from dementia should be comparable to those for people being treated for other illnesses under the National Health Service?
Asked by
Lord Sutherland of Houndwood (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 December 2009
Reference
715 c735
House
House of Lords
My noble friend makes an important point. We are currently commissioning research into best-interest decisions taken under the Mental Capacity Act. As part of the strategy, my honourable friend the Minister has, as my noble friend will know, established a ministerial group of which the Alzheimer’s Society is part, following on from the dementia research summit which pointed to many of those priorities.
Answered by
Baroness Thornton (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
2 December 2009
Reference
715 c734
House
House of Lords
Would the Minister assure this House that respite care for carers is given a high priority? Carers have to bear a tremendous burden and they cannot do it all the time, every month, every year.
Asked by
Baroness Knight of Collingtree (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 December 2009
Reference
715 c735
House
House of Lords
Does the Minister agree with the Nuffield Council that much more needs to be done to include people with dementia in society as equals? What action will her department take to make the services that people use every day, such as shops, restaurants and leisure services, more dementia-friendly?
Asked by
Baroness Greengross (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 December 2009
Reference
715 c735-6
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I declare an interest as a patron of the Alzheimer’s Research Trust. Following the Minister’s response to the last question, does she agree that the real issue is to devote more resources to research into dementia as a whole and particularly, as the Nuffield report suggests, into the social research, which covers all the aspects of care and people’s experience when they suffer with this disease? In a sense, that is one thing that is sadly lacking in present research resources.
Asked by
Baroness Jay of Paddington (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 December 2009
Reference
715 c734
House
House of Lords
Does my noble friend’s indication of that extend to helping carers at home to make difficult decisions that are very much in the field of ethics? Those decisions may go from asking themselves, "Can I lock him in while I go to do the shopping?" to deciding whose needs are paramount when residential care is being considered. Will the Government help carers with those kinds of ethical decisions?
Asked by
Baroness Pitkeathley (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 December 2009
Reference
715 c734
House
House of Lords
That was, I thought, one of the most powerful points made in the Nuffield report. In the consultation that Nuffield carried out, many carers expressed concern that they were treated with suspicion by professionals and felt that they needed to earn trust, despite the fact that they were providing most of the daily care. We totally agree that carers should be treated as care partners by professionals. The national dementia strategy makes it clear that family carers are the most important resource available to people with dementia and need to be supported and fully involved by the professions in the care that they provide.
Answered by
Baroness Thornton (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
2 December 2009
Reference
715 c733-4
House
House of Lords
I thank the Minister most warmly for her very positive reply. Would she accept that the vast majority of the 700,000 people suffering from dementia are cared for at home and that therefore carers at home should be treated as genuine care partners, together with the professional team? They should be trusted and given access to information. What would her Government do to promote that?
Asked by
Lord Harries of Pentregarth (Crossbench)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 December 2009
Reference
715 c733-4
House
House of Lords