Skip to main content

1-20 of 45 results for subject:"Nutt, David"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Science and Technology Committee
Date
9 December 2009
Reference
HC 158 2009-10
House
House of Commons
Lead member
Lord Grayling
Answering member
Alan Johnson
Department
Home Office
Type
Urgent questions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
498 c577
House
House of Commons

May I give unequivocal support not only to the Home Secretary's decision but to the reasoning behind it? He is obviously familiar with Professor Robin Murray's comments, which imply that the ACMD did not do a very good job in surveying the evidence previously. I know that the Home Secretary...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
498 c581
House
House of Commons

Let me start by reiterating my view that the Home Secretary's decision on Friday regarding Professor Nutt's future was the right one. Independent scientific advice is important, but those who take on formal roles with the Government have to be extremely cautious about the things that they say. Professor Nutt's...

Member
Lord Grayling (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
498 c577-8
House
House of Commons

It seems to me that Professor Nutt has been campaigning for the normalisation or deregulation of recreational drugs. Does the Home Secretary agree that membership of the advisory council should be subject to a strict register of members' interests and a strict ethical code on conflicts of interest, particularly financial...

Member
Jim Dobbin (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
498 c582-3
House
House of Commons

Will my right hon. Friend confirm that Professor Nutt does not hold a universal scientific view of the impact of cannabis or of ecstasy?

Member
Baroness Armstrong of Hill Top (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
498 c580
House
House of Commons

Does the Home Secretary agree that although he is entirely entitled to have any adviser whom he chooses and has confidence in, the problem is that the wider public do not get a great deal of independent scientific advice? This kind of incident can weaken the credibility of independent bodies.

Member
Nick Palmer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
498 c583-4
House
House of Commons

Is the Home Secretary satisfied that this episode does not risk putting off other experts from acting as independent Government advisers?

Member
Richard Taylor (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
498 c581
House
House of Commons

If a scientist is appointed a Government adviser but then told that what he says is dependent on the Government's policy, how can he be an independent scientist when advising the Government?

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
498 c582
House
House of Commons

Can the Secretary of State tell me what I am supposed to say to my constituents following this unedifying spat? He will know that young people in particular are very sensitive to mixed and inconsistent messages on drugs issues. God knows what they are thinking of this chaos. When will...

Member
Pete Wishart (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
498 c584
House
House of Commons

My Lords, I am sure that everyone will agree that Ministers must finally decide policy. However, has this episode not destroyed the claim that policy would be based on evidence? Does not the dismissal of Professor Nutt suggest that advice, on the whole, should be kept private, and that the...

Member
Lord Taverne (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
714 c11
House
House of Lords

Recently I went with the police in Sheffield to observe a raid on a property where cannabis was being grown. The local people were relieved that that had happened and that that activity was to be stopped. Is it not important, in formulating policy, that the Government take account of...

Member
Meg Munn (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
498 c581-2
House
House of Commons

The Government's chief scientific adviser is Professor John Beddington, who in February criticised the former Home Secretary for the way in which she treated Professor Nutt. Did the Home Secretary discuss the sacking of Professor Nutt with John Beddington before carrying out that act this weekend?

Member
Lord Willis of Knaresborough (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
498 c583
House
House of Commons

Both the Home Secretary and the hon. Member for Epsom and Ewell (Chris Grayling) have missed the point. The hon. Gentleman is at risk, indeed, of becoming the Home Secretary's Mini-Me, because today he again insisted that the only difference between them was that he thought Professor Nutt should have...

Member
Chris Huhne (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
498 c579-80
House
House of Commons

If my right hon. Friend had taken Professor Nutt's advice and lowered the categorisation of cannabis, and if as a result more young people had started to use it, would not that have been irresponsible?

Member
George Howarth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
498 c580
House
House of Commons

As the Home Secretary comes under attack, will he remind himself that it was Churchill who said that scientists should be on tap and not on top?

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
498 c580
House
House of Commons

As a Member with a scientific background, I would be the first to say that science must inform the decisions that it can inform. However, does my right hon. Friend agree that many parts of complex decisions cannot be measured or tested scientifically and may require a more subjective judgment...

Member
Stephen Ladyman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
498 c581
House
House of Commons

Does this saga not indicate that what we need in this country is a straightforward and honest debate about whether the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, now almost 40 years old, and the A, B and C classification that is wrapped up in it are fit for purpose in this...

Member
Brian Iddon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
498 c582
House
House of Commons

Was it made clear in Professor Nutt's employment documents, in the code of conduct or in writing that he was not permitted to speak on these issues in the public domain?

Member
Adam Afriyie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
498 c582
House
House of Commons

There is no question but that, since its establishment in 1971, the independent and expert advice of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs has been invaluable to the successive Governments whom it has served. Later today the House will consider imposing greater controls on the party drug GBL,...

Member
Alan Johnson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2009
Reference
498 c577
House
House of Commons