Skip to main content

1-20 of 3,794 results for subject:"Patients' rights"

Type

-
Early day motions (36)
+ Legislation (32) + Acts (3)
-
Public acts (3)
+ Bills (21) + Public bills (21)
-
Government bills (1)
+ Private members' bills (20)
-
Ballot bills (3)
-
Presentation bills (1)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (6)
-
Ten minute rule bills (10)
+ Delegated legislation (8)
-
Statutory instruments (8)
+ Members' contributions (3,260)
-
Business questions (1)
-
Maiden speeches (1)
-
Oral answers to questions (9)
+ Oral questions (12)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Proceeding contributions (3,239)
+ Parliamentary committees (73) + Committee proceedings (52)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (19)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (1)
-
European Committee proceedings (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (26)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (3)
-
Select Committee reports (11)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (9)
-
Select Committee written evidence (1)
+ Parliamentary papers (129)
-
Annual reports (3)
-
Command papers (14)
-
Consultation papers (5)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (2)
-
Deposited papers (77)
-
House of Commons papers (21)
-
House of Lords papers (7)
-
Impact assessments (4)
-
Unprinted papers (11)
-
White papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (190) + Debates (120)
-
Adjournment debates (8)
-
Backbench debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (52)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (19)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (1)
-
European Committee proceedings (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (26)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (3)
-
Debates on select committee reports (2)
+ Legislative debates (97)
-
Debates on bills (95)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (2)
-
Questions for short debate (6)
+ Formal proceedings (1)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (1)
+ Statements (67) + Oral statements (13)
-
Ministerial statements (12)
-
Select Committee statements (1)
-
Written statements (54)
-
Urgent questions (2)
+ Parliamentary questions (150)
-
Business questions (1)
+ Oral questions (12)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Urgent questions (2)
-
Written questions (135)
+ Research briefings (14) + Commons Briefing papers (11)
-
Briefing papers on bills (2)
-
Commons Debate packs (2)
-
POSTnotes (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The Infected Blood Inquiry made recommendations to improve patient care and safety, and strengthen the voice of patients in the healthcare system.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
22 May 2026
Reference
CBP-10081

This briefing gives an overview of hormone treatments used to treat gender dysphoria in children and young people and details the government-funded PATHWAYS research programme into the safety and effectiveness of these treatments.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
19 March 2026
Reference
CBP-10596

Lords committee stage fifth day. Clause 1 under consideration.

Lead member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton
Answering member
Baroness Levitt
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HL)
Notes
Scottish legislative consent correspondence published, Northern Ireland and Welsh legislative consent sought.
Date
9 January 2026
Reference
851 cc500-1508
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Carlile of Berriew

25: Clause 1, page 1, line 12, at end insert—

“(e) has had their application for assistance under section (Application for assistance with suicide order) approved by the Court,”

Member
Lord Carlile of Berriew (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 January 2026
Reference
851 c500
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome what the noble and learned Lord has just said, which I am sure will be welcome to most Members of the Committee.

Amendment 25 stands in my name and those of my noble friend Lady Hollins and my noble and right reverend friend Lord Harries of Pentregarth....

Member
Lord Carlile of Berriew (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 January 2026
Reference
851 cc500-1432
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to Amendment 120 and the amendments consequential to it. I should explain at the outset that my remarks incorporate the concerns of my noble friend Lord Farmer, who regrets that he is unable to be here. We are both worried, as I know are many...

Member
Lord Shinkwin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 January 2026
Reference
851 cc501-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have added my name to several of my noble friend’s amendments and I would like to congratulate him on finding a solution that could allow the Bill to meet one of the sponsors’ original aspirations. The impact of Amendments 25 and 120 are many. One that may...

Member
Baroness Hollins (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1434-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak briefly to two of the amendments in this group. I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Carlile, for meeting me in relation to his proposals under Amendment 120.

This group also contains related Amendment 116, which would introduce the capacity test that the noble Lord...

Member
Baroness Berridge (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1435-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Carlile, made a very powerful case, if I may say so, for judicial control to provide the independent scrutiny that we all agree is required in some form to ensure that the criteria of the Bill are satisfied in

individual cases. However, I offer...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1438-9
House
House of Lords

I am interested in the noble Lord’s view of the panel. I appreciate that he is discussing Schedule 2, but there are parts of this Bill where a unanimous decision of that panel is not needed, so it is quite possible that the medical person could be overruled by the...

Member
Baroness Coffey (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 January 2026
Reference
851 c1439
House
House of Lords

With great respect, that is not my understanding. The next point I was going to make is that paragraph 5(3) of Schedule 2 answers the very point just made by the noble Baroness. It states:

“The panel is to be treated as having decided to refuse to grant a certificate of...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1439-506
House
House of Lords

May I probe the noble Lord a little further? In the evidence given by witnesses to the Select Committee, it was said that somebody should not be allowed simply to abstain; and that, if these people are being appointed as professionals to these panels, they should express a view. At...

Member
Baroness Coffey (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 January 2026
Reference
851 c507
House
House of Lords

I am sorry but, with the greatest respect, the noble Baroness has not listened or read what is in the Bill. If any of the three members is unwise enough to abstain—I agree that it is highly undesirable that they should—because they are not satisfied that the case is made...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 January 2026
Reference
851 c1440
House
House of Lords

I agree with the noble Lord’s assessment.

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 January 2026
Reference
851 c1440
House
House of Lords

If the noble Baroness reads the Bill, her concern will be addressed.

Then we need to look at paragraph 8 of Schedule 2, which tells the commissioner that he or she

“may give guidance about … practice and procedure”.

I would be very surprised if the practice and procedure did not allow for...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 January 2026
Reference
851 c1440
House
House of Lords

I am very grateful to the noble Lord. If he just looks again at paragraph 5 of Schedule 2, it may be that there is a wholesale ambiguity. Sub-paragraph (2) says:

“Decisions of a panel may be taken by a majority vote; but this is subject to sub-paragraph (3)”,

which the noble...

Member
Lord Carlile of Berriew (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1440-508
House
House of Lords

No, they do not, because the majority vote does not apply to the question of whether a certificate of eligibility applies. There may be a majority vote on other issues; for example, whether to have a hearing or to require documents, or something of that sort. But on the fundamental...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 January 2026
Reference
851 cc508-1441
House
House of Lords

I wish to speak to Amendments 25 and 120 in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Carlile of Berriew, to which my name is attached. They are amendments which I believe go to the very heart of the Bill. It is vital that if the Bill eventually comes into...

Member
Lord Harries of Pentregarth (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1441-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am the only person in this House who was President of the Family Division. I did the final part of the Bland case, to allow him to die. I very much prefer the idea that we should have a court-based decision, for the reasons that have already...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 January 2026
Reference
851 c1442
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am diffidently following the noble and learned Baroness, with her experience both as a legislator and as a very senior

judge. I am very pleased she intervened when she did, because her contribution has been most helpful, There is always a difficulty for someone like me, who...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1442-3
House
House of Lords