Skip to main content

1-20 of 72 results for subject:"Pearson Group"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps she is taking to ensure (a) the adequacy of results issued by Pearson for this year’s Key Stage 2 SATs results, (b) that Pearson delivers future results on time and (c) that teachers have adequate access to appeals, in the...

Asked by
Danny Kruger (Reform UK)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
18177
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of the delayed publication of 2025 Key Stage 2 SATs results on pupils, parents and schools; what discussions she has had with Pearson regarding reported issues in the marking process; and if she...

Asked by
Alberto Costa (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Tabled
Date
3 July 2026
Reference
15724
House
House of Commons
Deposited by
Department for Education
Type
Deposited papers
Date
23 January 2023
Reference
DEP2023-0149
House
House of Commons
Deposited by
Whips Office (Lords)
Type
Deposited papers
Date
5 September 2018
Reference
DEP2018-0874
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome the opportunity to draw the regulations to the attention of the House, although it is unfortunate, to say the least, that this debate is taking place five weeks after they came into force. However, there is greater cause for concern because, without consultation or public announcement,...

Member
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2018
Reference
792 cc1650-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Watson of Invergowrie, for bringing this Motion forward. I completely share his disquiet at the way in which these regulations have been framed. I am grateful to the Minister—his department has been in helpful correspondence with me since—but the fundamental...

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2018
Reference
792 c1653
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with almost every word that the noble Lord, Lord Lucas, has said. My noble friend Lord Watson is to be commended for pursuing this issue with terrier-like commitment. Having now read the debates in the House of Commons, I can say that the gravity of the...

Member
Lord Adonis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2018
Reference
792 cc1654-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we on these Benches share the concerns expressed by the noble Lord, Lord Watson, and so eloquently expressed by the noble Lords, Lord Adonis and Lord Lucas. Will the Minister say what data the OfS is likely to share with Pearson? We note that Pearson is the only...

Member
Baroness Garden of Frognal (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2018
Reference
792 cc1655-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Watson, for tabling this Motion. The noble Lord has raised concerns that these regulations create significant powers for the Office for Students to grant access to students’ confidential data to a single commercial provider. He also calls on Her Majesty’s Government to...

Member
Viscount Younger of Leckie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2018
Reference
792 c1656
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for that answer, but it does not get to the root of the problem. He talks of scrutiny, but the point is that these regulations came into force some five weeks ago. How does that square with scrutiny? It does not with me.

Member
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2018
Reference
792 c1656
House
House of Lords

They have been scrutinised as part of the scrutiny process. That is where we are—there is no issue to discuss here.

Member
Viscount Younger of Leckie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2018
Reference
792 c1656
House
House of Lords

Scrutinised by whom?

Member
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2018
Reference
792 c1656
House
House of Lords

They have gone through the scrutiny procedure, as mentioned.

Let me continue. These regulations and the enabling primary legislation provide greater protection, scrutiny and control over information sharing than before. The regulations replicate, and in some cases improve on, the arrangements that HEFCE, OFFA and the DfE had in place for...

Member
Viscount Younger of Leckie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2018
Reference
792 cc1656-7
House
House of Lords

The noble Viscount always uses these weasel words. He says, “if it was necessary to share that data”. What does that mean? In what circumstances would it be necessary to share that data?

Member
Lord Adonis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2018
Reference
792 c1657
House
House of Lords

I think that it would be wise if I continued with my remarks and then, if there are further concerns, I shall be happy to listen.

First, the noble Lord, Lord Watson, referred to the “single commercial provider” within the regulations, which is Pearson Education Ltd. To reassure him and the...

Member
Viscount Younger of Leckie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2018
Reference
792 cc1657-9
House
House of Lords

I apologise to the Minister, but could he answer my question as to whether the OfS will be charging Pearson for the data that it shares with it?

Member
Baroness Garden of Frognal (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2018
Reference
792 c1659
House
House of Lords

I will write to the noble Baroness with that information. It may not only be a charge; there may be an agreement in place and I would prefer to get the full information to her.

3 pm

Member
Viscount Younger of Leckie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2018
Reference
792 cc1659-1660
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not believe my noble friend has answered either of the questions I posed. If the Government are content with drawing a wide power in regulations for a narrow use of personal data, we as a House should react to that by greatly strengthening our scrutiny of...

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2018
Reference
792 c1660
House
House of Lords

I take note of my noble friend’s broader points about the scrutiny of second legislation—I am simply taking note of that—and I will write to him on his points about data-sharing agreements and their publication. I hope that that will satisfy him.

Member
Viscount Younger of Leckie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2018
Reference
792 c1660
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have participated in the debate. I thank the noble Lord, Lord Lucas, for his support, which I welcome, and for sharing our concern about the privacy of the information which is to be shared. I noticed that while he was characterising the...

Member
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2018
Reference
792 cc1660-1
House
House of Lords