1-20 of 2,290 results for subject:"Perinatal mortality"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.279 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.009 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Perinatal mortality"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Perinatal mortality" OR subject_t:Stillbirth OR subject_t:Stillbirths OR subject_ses:92411
Type
House
Session
More
Year
More
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
More
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Merron on 15 July (HL1814), what evidence they relied on when describing reviews conducted using the Perinatal Mortality Review Tool as “high-quality”, “objective” and “robust”; and how that description is reconciled with the finding of the December 2023 Mothers...
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Merron on 15 July (HL1814), what evidence they relied on when describing reviews conducted using the Perinatal Mortality Review Tool as “high-quality”, “objective” and “robust”; and how that description is reconciled with the finding of the December 2023 Mothers...
The Government recognises the concerns raised about how perinatal mortality reviews are carried out. The Perinatal Mortality Review Tool provides a framework which needs to also be supported by effective implementation to deliver the objectives of these reviews.
My Rt Hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, is chairing the Maternity and Neonatal Taskforce to develop a national action plan to reform maternity and neonatal services. As Baroness Amos’ report makes clear, there is a pressing need to improve the quality, transparency, oversight, and accountability of investigations and we are working with the taskforce to review this.
With regard to coronial investigation of stillbirth, I refer the Noble Lord to the answer provided on 15 July in response to Question HL1814, which, for ease of reference, has been reproduced below:
“All bereaved parents have the option to be involved in a high-quality review of the death of their baby, from 22 weeks' gestation up to 28 days post birth, through a perinatal mortality review. While this is carried out by the hospital or hospitals where the mother and baby were looked after, a national tool is in place, namely the national Perinatal Mortality Review Tool, to ensure such reviews are objective, robust, and standardised.
“There are a range of views on how stillbirths should be investigated, and it is important that the Government’s conclusions on coronial investigations of stillbirths reflect the recommendations Baroness Amos has made through the final report of her independent investigation into National Health Service maternity and neonatal care, and supports the most effective model for maternity investigations.
“As recommended in Baroness Amos’ report, we will publish the Government’s response to the 2019 consultation, jointly with the Ministry of Justice, in due course.”
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Merron on 15 July (HL1814), whether they consider a review conducted by the hospital or hospitals responsible for the care under review to constitute an independent investigation; and, if not, what independent investigatory route is available following an antepartum stillbirth where the parents...
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Merron on 15 July (HL1814), whether they consider a review conducted by the hospital or hospitals responsible for the care under review to constitute an independent investigation; and, if not, what independent investigatory route is available following an antepartum stillbirth where the parents...
The Government recognises the concerns raised about how perinatal mortality reviews are carried out. The Perinatal Mortality Review Tool provides a framework which needs to also be supported by effective implementation to deliver the objectives of these reviews.
My Rt Hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, is chairing the Maternity and Neonatal Taskforce to develop a national action plan to reform maternity and neonatal services. As Baroness Amos’ report makes clear, there is a pressing need to improve the quality, transparency, oversight, and accountability of investigations and we are working with the taskforce to review this.
With regard to coronial investigation of stillbirth, I refer the Noble Lord to the answer provided on 15 July in response to Question HL1814, which, for ease of reference, has been reproduced below:
“All bereaved parents have the option to be involved in a high-quality review of the death of their baby, from 22 weeks' gestation up to 28 days post birth, through a perinatal mortality review. While this is carried out by the hospital or hospitals where the mother and baby were looked after, a national tool is in place, namely the national Perinatal Mortality Review Tool, to ensure such reviews are objective, robust, and standardised.
“There are a range of views on how stillbirths should be investigated, and it is important that the Government’s conclusions on coronial investigations of stillbirths reflect the recommendations Baroness Amos has made through the final report of her independent investigation into National Health Service maternity and neonatal care, and supports the most effective model for maternity investigations.
“As recommended in Baroness Amos’ report, we will publish the Government’s response to the 2019 consultation, jointly with the Ministry of Justice, in due course.”
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Merron on 15 July (HL1814), which specific findings or recommendations in the final report of the National Maternity and Neonatal Investigation they consider relevant to determining whether coroners should be permitted to investigate stillbirths, other than the recommendation that the Government publish its response to the consultation...
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Merron on 15 July (HL1814), which specific findings or recommendations in the final report of the National Maternity and Neonatal Investigation they consider relevant to determining whether coroners should be permitted to investigate stillbirths, other than the recommendation that the Government publish its response to the consultation...
The Government recognises the concerns raised about how perinatal mortality reviews are carried out. The Perinatal Mortality Review Tool provides a framework which needs to also be supported by effective implementation to deliver the objectives of these reviews.
My Rt Hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, is chairing the Maternity and Neonatal Taskforce to develop a national action plan to reform maternity and neonatal services. As Baroness Amos’ report makes clear, there is a pressing need to improve the quality, transparency, oversight, and accountability of investigations and we are working with the taskforce to review this.
With regard to coronial investigation of stillbirth, I refer the Noble Lord to the answer provided on 15 July in response to Question HL1814, which, for ease of reference, has been reproduced below:
“All bereaved parents have the option to be involved in a high-quality review of the death of their baby, from 22 weeks' gestation up to 28 days post birth, through a perinatal mortality review. While this is carried out by the hospital or hospitals where the mother and baby were looked after, a national tool is in place, namely the national Perinatal Mortality Review Tool, to ensure such reviews are objective, robust, and standardised.
“There are a range of views on how stillbirths should be investigated, and it is important that the Government’s conclusions on coronial investigations of stillbirths reflect the recommendations Baroness Amos has made through the final report of her independent investigation into National Health Service maternity and neonatal care, and supports the most effective model for maternity investigations.
“As recommended in Baroness Amos’ report, we will publish the Government’s response to the 2019 consultation, jointly with the Ministry of Justice, in due course.”
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Merron on 15 July (HL1814), what safeguards exist to prevent uncertainty or error in the assessment of gestational age, or in the retrospective classification of a stillbirth as antepartum or intrapartum, from determining whether bereaved parents have access to an independent investigation.
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Merron on 15 July (HL1814), what safeguards exist to prevent uncertainty or error in the assessment of gestational age, or in the retrospective classification of a stillbirth as antepartum or intrapartum, from determining whether bereaved parents have access to an independent investigation.
The Government recognises the concerns raised about how perinatal mortality reviews are carried out. The Perinatal Mortality Review Tool provides a framework which needs to also be supported by effective implementation to deliver the objectives of these reviews.
My Rt Hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, is chairing the Maternity and Neonatal Taskforce to develop a national action plan to reform maternity and neonatal services. As Baroness Amos’ report makes clear, there is a pressing need to improve the quality, transparency, oversight, and accountability of investigations and we are working with the taskforce to review this.
With regard to coronial investigation of stillbirth, I refer the Noble Lord to the answer provided on 15 July in response to Question HL1814, which, for ease of reference, has been reproduced below:
“All bereaved parents have the option to be involved in a high-quality review of the death of their baby, from 22 weeks' gestation up to 28 days post birth, through a perinatal mortality review. While this is carried out by the hospital or hospitals where the mother and baby were looked after, a national tool is in place, namely the national Perinatal Mortality Review Tool, to ensure such reviews are objective, robust, and standardised.
“There are a range of views on how stillbirths should be investigated, and it is important that the Government’s conclusions on coronial investigations of stillbirths reflect the recommendations Baroness Amos has made through the final report of her independent investigation into National Health Service maternity and neonatal care, and supports the most effective model for maternity investigations.
“As recommended in Baroness Amos’ report, we will publish the Government’s response to the 2019 consultation, jointly with the Ministry of Justice, in due course.”
Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.
Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.
This briefing gives an overview of women’s experiences of maternity services in England, including disparities in the care received by women from minority ethnic groups. It provides details of investigations into maternity units at individual NHS trusts, the government-commissioned national maternity and neonatal investigation, and policies to improve care. This briefing supplements the Library paper Quality and safety of maternity care (England) which contains information on key policy documents and developments (until February 2025).
This briefing gives an overview of women’s experiences of maternity services in England, including disparities in the care received by women from minority ethnic groups. It provides details of investigations into maternity units at individual NHS trusts, the government-commissioned national maternity and neonatal investigation, and policies to improve care. This...
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made of the potential implications for his policies of the article in The Lancet by Dr Czeizel entitled Can terathanasia explain the protective effect of folic-acid supplementation on birth defects, published on 16 August 1997,...
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made of the potential implications for his policies of the article in The Lancet by Dr Czeizel entitled Can terathanasia explain the protective effect of folic-acid supplementation on birth defects, published on 16 August 1997,...
In the United Kingdom, folic acid fortification was first considered by the Committee on Medical Aspects of Food and Nutrition Policy (COMA) in 2000.
In its report on Folic Acid and the Prevention of Disease, COMA considered the 1997 paper by Hook and Czeizelb, Can terathanasia explain the protective effect of folic-acid supplementation on birth defects?.
COMA noted that “It has been suggested that some agents that reduce the incidence of birth defects might do so by increasing the rate of death or abortion of affected fetuses ("terathanasia") and that the effect of folic acid on [neural tube defects] NTDs could be mediated by this means. For this reason, there has been some concern over an increased rate of spontaneous abortions among women taking folic acid supplements.”
COMA further noted that it “is most likely due, however, to an increase in fertility and multiple pregnancies among women taking supplements and to an effect of folate in allowing the survival of non-viable conceptuses to a stage where their loss is recognised as abortions. The generally accepted view is that folic acid supplements prevent NTDs simply by allowing the normal development of the fetal neural tube.”
Folic acid fortification was recommended by COMA in 2000 and by its successor the Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN) in 2006, after an extensive review of the evidence on folate and health. The SACN has further considered the evidence in its 2009 report to the Chief Medical Officer on folic acid and colorectal cancer risk and its 2017 update on folic acid and did not identify any further concerns on the issue.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, pursuant to written question 11338 on Folic Acid, what assessment he has made of the potential impact of the policy on prostate cancer rates and fetal death rates.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, pursuant to written question 11338 on Folic Acid, what assessment he has made of the potential impact of the policy on prostate cancer rates and fetal death rates.
Folic acid fortification was recommended by the Committee on Medical Aspects of Food and Nutrition Policy (COMA) in 2000 and by its successor the Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN) in 2006, after an extensive review of the evidence on folate and health. The SACN has further considered the evidence in its 2009 report to the Chief Medical Officer on folic acid and colorectal cancer risk and its 2017 update on folic acid.
In SACN’s 2017 update on folic acid, the evidence on high folic acid intakes on cancer risk specifically in relation to prostate, breast, colorectal, and overall cancer risk was reviewed. The report concluded that the findings from the different types of studies were inconsistent but overall, the evidence was inconclusive in relation to prostate and colorectal cancer risk and did not suggest an adverse association with breast cancer or overall cancer risk.
The SACN’s risk assessments concluded that ‘conclusive evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) has shown that folic acid supplementation during the early stages of pregnancy can reduce the risk of the fetus developing neural tube defects (NTDs)’.
Foetal death rates was not a health outcome specifically considered by the SACN.
The level of folic acid chosen for fortification was 250 micrograms per 100 grams flour, with a view to minimising the risk of the population exceeding the tolerable upper intake level, which was considered in the Governments impact assessment.
The Government is planning an evaluation on the impact of the policy.
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Merron on 19 June (HL946), given that access to independent investigation is not available to antepartum stillbirths or stillbirths before 37 weeks’ gestation, and depends upon estimated gestational age or retrospective clinical classification as antepartum or intrapartum, what...
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Merron on 19 June (HL946), given that access to independent investigation is not available to antepartum stillbirths or stillbirths before 37 weeks’ gestation, and depends upon estimated gestational age or retrospective clinical classification as antepartum or intrapartum, what...
All bereaved parents have the option to be involved in a high-quality review of the death of their baby, from 22 weeks' gestation up to 28 days post birth, through a perinatal mortality review. While this is carried out by the hospital or hospitals where the mother and baby were looked after, a national tool is in place, namely the national Perinatal Mortality Review Tool, to ensure such reviews are objective, robust, and standardised.
There are a range of views on how stillbirths should be investigated, and it is important that the Government’s conclusions on coronial investigations of stillbirths reflect the recommendations Baroness Amos has made through the final report of her independent investigation into National Health Service maternity and neonatal care, and supports the most effective model for maternity investigations.
As recommended in Baroness Amos’ report, we will publish the Government’s response to the 2019 consultation, jointly with the Ministry of Justice, in due course.
Ten minute rule motion for leave to bring in a Bill. Agreed to on question. Presentation and first reading (Bill 121). To be read a second time on 4 September.
Ten minute rule motion for leave to bring in a Bill. Agreed to on question. Presentation and first reading (Bill 121). To be read a second time on 4 September.
I beg to move,
That leave be given to bring in a Bill to permit stillbirths to be registered remotely in England and Wales; and for connected purposes.
I am grateful for the opportunity to introduce the Bill to the House today. It is a modest proposal. It is not about changing...
I beg to move,
That leave be given to bring in a Bill to permit stillbirths to be registered remotely in England and Wales; and for connected purposes.
I am grateful for the opportunity to introduce the Bill to the House today. It is a modest proposal. It is not about changing...
To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure that NHS Trusts comply with the National Bereavement Care Pathway for miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy and molar pregnancy.
To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure that NHS Trusts comply with the National Bereavement Care Pathway for miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy and molar pregnancy.
In October 2025, NHS England set out the expectation, through the Medium Term Planning Framework, for trusts to implement the National Bereavement Care Pathway for stillbirth and neonatal death. In practice, some of these standards will also be applicable in the context of miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, and molar pregnancy, offering support for these women and families.
While miscarriage and other types of pregnancy loss were not explicitly covered in Baroness Amos’ final report into National Health Service maternity and neonatal care, she did make a recommendation around fundamentally reforming care, including through the development of a new modern service framework. The taskforce will consider all stages of maternity and neonatal care when developing its new national action plan, and we anticipate that the taskforce may wish to include pregnancy loss.
We are also working closely with NHS England to improve the availability of Early Pregnancy Assessment Units, and have extended the Baby Loss Certificate scheme, which provides recognition of pre-24-week loss.
To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have made to include the National Bereavement Care Pathway for miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy and molar pregnancy in mandatory guidance for the NHS.
To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have made to include the National Bereavement Care Pathway for miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy and molar pregnancy in mandatory guidance for the NHS.
In October 2025, NHS England set out the expectation, through the Medium Term Planning Framework, for trusts to implement the National Bereavement Care Pathway for stillbirth and neonatal death. In practice, some of these standards will also be applicable in the context of miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, and molar pregnancy, offering support for these women and families.
While miscarriage and other types of pregnancy loss were not explicitly covered in Baroness Amos’ final report into National Health Service maternity and neonatal care, she did make a recommendation around fundamentally reforming care, including through the development of a new modern service framework. The taskforce will consider all stages of maternity and neonatal care when developing its new national action plan, and we anticipate that the taskforce may wish to include pregnancy loss.
We are also working closely with NHS England to improve the availability of Early Pregnancy Assessment Units, and have extended the Baby Loss Certificate scheme, which provides recognition of pre-24-week loss.
My Lords, I thank the Minister for the Statement and the noble Baroness, Lady Amos, and her team for the thoroughness and compassion with which they have conducted this important investigation. Above all, our thoughts must be and are with the women, babies and families whose experiences lie at the...
My Lords, I thank the Minister for the Statement and the noble Baroness, Lady Amos, and her team for the thoroughness and compassion with which they have conducted this important investigation. Above all, our thoughts must be and are with the women, babies and families whose experiences lie at the...
My Lords, this is another week and another traumatic and difficult-to-read report about the state of maternity services. Behind it are thousands and thousands of women and families deeply affected by these service failures. I thank them all for their contributions to this report, as well as the noble Baroness,...
My Lords, this is another week and another traumatic and difficult-to-read report about the state of maternity services. Behind it are thousands and thousands of women and families deeply affected by these service failures. I thank them all for their contributions to this report, as well as the noble Baroness,...
My Lords, we know—and we can never acknowledge it enough—that women, babies and families across the country are being harmed, traumatised and let down by a broken system. I am grateful to both Front Benches for the way in which they have received this report and for their support, and...
My Lords, we know—and we can never acknowledge it enough—that women, babies and families across the country are being harmed, traumatised and let down by a broken system. I am grateful to both Front Benches for the way in which they have received this report and for their support, and...
My Lords, I declare an interest as the chair of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists board of trustees. The RCOG desperately wants to see an improvement in the services that mothers and children are getting in maternity. I do not know whether the Minister is aware that some...
My Lords, I declare an interest as the chair of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists board of trustees. The RCOG desperately wants to see an improvement in the services that mothers and children are getting in maternity. I do not know whether the Minister is aware that some...
My noble friend allows me to say how grateful we are to the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists for its continuing work, as we are grateful to our many partners who are committed to driving through change. We are working particularly closely with RCOG in developing routes forward. I...
My noble friend allows me to say how grateful we are to the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists for its continuing work, as we are grateful to our many partners who are committed to driving through change. We are working particularly closely with RCOG in developing routes forward. I...
My Lords, like others I recognise the kindness and compassion that the majority of staff in our health service deliver, but as the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care rightly said:
“We must break the cycle of recommendations sitting on a shelf gathering dust”.
The Minister has already made it...
My Lords, like others I recognise the kindness and compassion that the majority of staff in our health service deliver, but as the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care rightly said:
“We must break the cycle of recommendations sitting on a shelf gathering dust”.
The Minister has already made it...