Skip to main content

1-20 of 266 results for subject:"Personal loans"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to introduce legislation to make debt restructuring binding for all private creditors on loans provided for under legislation for England and Wales.

Asked by
Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 March 2022
Reference
HL6549
House
House of Lords

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, how many personnel loans from other parts of the Civil Service there have been into the Government commercial function since it was established.

Asked by
Jon Trickett (Labour)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 September 2017
Reference
7556
House
House of Commons

Bank of England and Financial Services Bill [Lords]

The following is an extract from the Second Reading debate of the Bank of England and Financial Services Bill [Lords] on 1 February 2016.

My right hon. Friend the Member for Cities of London and Westminster spoke up for his constituency. He mentioned a...

Member
Harriett Baldwin (Conservative)
Department
Treasury
Type
Ministerial corrections
Date
4 February 2016
Reference
605 c7MC
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the Bill be now read a Second time.

Following the financial crisis, the Government fundamentally reformed the UK’s system of financial regulation, replacing the failed tripartite system with a set of regulators with clear responsibilities and objectives. We have also taken concerted action to improve conduct...

Member
Harriett Baldwin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2016
Reference
605 c653
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Lady agree that one of the real problems in the culture of banking, which we all want to get right, is the role of auditors? Auditors should have been there, should have spotted the dangers and should have blown the whistle, but they did not. Is it...

Member
Barry Sheerman (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2016
Reference
605 c653
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is right to highlight the importance of auditors. Others in this place will consider the role of auditors in the crash, but I think what he will welcome in the Bill is the fact that the National Audit Office, for the first time, will have the ability...

Member
Harriett Baldwin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2016
Reference
605 c653
House
House of Commons

Following on from my hon. Friend’s intervention, does the Minister not agree that one of the fundamental problems with

auditors is that they are always employed, effectively, by the managers of banks or companies when they should be representing shareholders? If they want their contracts renewed, time and again private...

Member
Kelvin Hopkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2016
Reference
605 c653
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is absolutely correct that the Bill focuses specifically on the role of the National Audit Office, one independent arm of government, and the Bank of England, another independent agency. The Bill does not particularly focus on the role of auditors in private companies, but I am sure...

Member
Harriett Baldwin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2016
Reference
605 c654
House
House of Commons

I welcome the fact that the NAO will be looking at the Bank, but it will need extra resources to do that big job. Will the Minister guarantee that the extra people employed will represent the shareholders—us and the people we represent—and will not simply come from the banking sector...

Member
Kelvin Hopkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2016
Reference
605 c654
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman rightly points out the importance of the NAO’s having the right resources. I have not had any representations about this particular move, but I am sure it will make its feelings known, should it require those resources.

The Bill also makes changes to the court. We will simplify...

Member
Harriett Baldwin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2016
Reference
605 cc654-5
House
House of Commons

I am slightly concerned that the Bill moves us towards a system of less tension and a cosier relationship between the Bank and the Treasury. That would worry me and other Members. Is it true? I always thought that that tension was healthy.

Member
Barry Sheerman (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2016
Reference
605 c655
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is right to highlight the importance of the Bank’s operational independence, which Gordon Brown introduced in 1997—it was his greatest legacy to our country—but he will note that his colleagues’ motion calls for a stronger role for both the Treasury and Parliament and arguably for less independence...

Member
Harriett Baldwin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2016
Reference
605 c655
House
House of Commons

Following the point made by my hon. Friend the Member for Huddersfield (Mr Sheerman), it would be even more worrying if there were a cosy relationship between the NAO and the Treasury. The NAO should be responsible to this House, and the Treasury should not be able to get its...

Member
Kelvin Hopkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2016
Reference
605 c655
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is right to recognise that the NAO is completely independent of the Treasury. Although I have a nominal role on the Public Accounts Committee, the NAO is rightly accountable to Parliament.

Member
Harriett Baldwin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2016
Reference
605 c655
House
House of Commons

I very much welcome the move to turn the PRA into the PRC on a par with the MPC and the FPC. Does the Minister not have any anxiety, however, that that leaves the FCA, the consumer protection conduct of business element, out on a limb, with a different status...

Member
Stewart Hosie (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2016
Reference
605 c655
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is right to highlight the fact that the FCA is set up completely differently. However, I stress that the similarity lies in the operational independence. When it comes to the

FCA, the Treasury is obviously able to appoint the chief executive and the board, but the operational...

Member
Harriett Baldwin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2016
Reference
605 cc655-6
House
House of Commons

Does the Minister agree that the senior managers regime will cut through the accountability far more, as the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards discovered? The regulatory regime at the time had the effect of forcing senior managers to create ignorance of what was going on within their institutions. The Bill...

Member
Mark Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2016
Reference
605 c656
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend, who was a distinguished member of the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards, is right to say that the commission highlighted the fact that the approved persons regime

made it very difficult to pin down responsibility. The new regime, with its duty of responsibility clearly articulated —every organisation...

Member
Harriett Baldwin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2016
Reference
605 cc656-7
House
House of Commons

Can the Minister explain what has happened in the two and a half years since the 2013 Act was passed—essentially, by a Conservative Government—to change the reverse burden of proof?

Member
George Kerevan (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2016
Reference
605 c657
House
House of Commons

As the hon. Gentleman knows, the measures in the 2013 Act are due to come into force on 7 March this year. The position in relation to the reverse burden of proof is becoming increasingly clear. Andrew Bailey said in his evidence to the Treasury Committee, of which the hon....

Member
Harriett Baldwin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2016
Reference
605 c657
House
House of Commons