Skip to main content

1-20 of 525 results for subject:"Programme motions"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Laid by
Clerk of the House
Department
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons sessional returns; House of Commons papers
Date
12 September 2024
Reference
HC (2024) 1 2024-25
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Clerk of the House
Department
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons sessional returns; House of Commons papers
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
HC (2023) 1 2023-24
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker. I am afraid that I could not give you notice of this point of order

because it follows the SNP’s Standing Order No. 24 application. It seems to me that the reason today’s debate on the Illegal Migration Bill finishes at the...

Member
Peter Bone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2023
Reference
731 c755
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Clerk of the House
Department
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons sessional returns; House of Commons papers
Date
28 November 2022
Reference
HC (2022) 1 2022-23
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Clerk of the House
Department
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons sessional returns; House of Commons papers
Notes
Ordered to be printed 25 May 2021. Appeared as a Correction to the Vote of 7 February 2022 on 24 January 2023.
Date
7 February 2022
Reference
HC (2021) 1 2021-22
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Mr Deputy Speaker. There is no provision on today’s Order Paper for debating the programme motion, which is listed to be moved forthwith at 10 pm. That motion proposes that the further stages of the Bill—Committee, Report and Third Reading—be taken in single session on...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Points of order
Date
5 October 2020
Reference
681 c651
House
House of Commons

To ask the Leader of the House, whether he plans to provide additional time in programme motions for House Business as a result of the additional time required for divisions in the House while social distancing measures are in place.

Asked by
Owen Thompson (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Leader of the House
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 June 2020
Reference
52212
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Clerk of the House
Department
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons sessional returns; House of Commons papers
Date
20 January 2020
Reference
HC (2019) 1 2019-20
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Clerk of the House
Department
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons sessional returns; House of Commons papers
Date
20 January 2020
Reference
HC 1 2019-20
House
House of Commons

Thank you, Mr Speaker. I think I am petitioning to make another statement.

Owing to the loss of the programme motion, I have to make a statement, because the Bill now stands referred to a Committee under Standing Orders 83A and 63. I mention that for the convenience of the House....

Member
Jacob Rees-Mogg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2019
Reference
666 cc934-795
House
House of Commons

I thank the Leader of the House for making a business statement and not a point of order. He heard Her Majesty’s Opposition and will know that we stand ready to work with the Government. The Opposition Chief Whip is a very reasonable person and will be very happy to...

Member
Valerie Vaz (Labour)
Type
Business questions
Date
22 October 2019
Reference
666 cc795-6
House
House of Commons

I was fascinated to hear that the Bill was in limbo. Theologically speaking, it is reported that Pope Benedict XVI abolished limbo. I wonder whether the Bill is not in the heaven that is having been passed, or in the hell of having failed, but in purgatory, where it

is...

Member
Jacob Rees-Mogg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2019
Reference
666 cc899-935
House
House of Commons

Forms.

Member
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2019
Reference
666 c935
House
House of Commons

Forms and tariffs are completely different things. I am so sorry that the Opposition are confused, after so many years of debate on this subject, between a form and a tariff. No doubt we can provide specialist expertise to explain the difference.

The interruption of the Queen’s Speech debate has a...

Member
Jacob Rees-Mogg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2019
Reference
666 c935
House
House of Commons

Given everything else, the Government must clearly have an understanding of the limit beyond which it will be not be possible to go with the Bill in respect of leaving the EU by 31 October and completing its progress. In the light of that, has my right hon. Friend kept...

Member
Iain Duncan Smith (Conservative)
Type
Business questions
Date
22 October 2019
Reference
666 c935
House
House of Commons

The problem—the constraint—is, of course, the fact that this is a bicameral legislature. However long we sat, the House of Lords would also have to sit, and the deadline is Thursday week. Even if we were to sit around the clock, having the hours that we were to have had...

Member
Jacob Rees-Mogg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2019
Reference
666 c935
House
House of Commons

I thank the Leader of the House for his short business statement. He is absolutely right: he has met his obligations according to the Standing Orders of the House by making the statement. I also thank him for not making it through a point of order, as he did on...

Member
Pete Wishart (Scottish National Party)
Type
Business questions
Date
22 October 2019
Reference
666 cc935-6
House
House of Commons

I hate to quibble with the hon. Gentleman, but it is not a self-imposed deadline. It is a deadline that was selected by the European Union. Members may recall that the previous Government went to the European Union suggesting a deadline around June. It was rejected by the EU, which...

Member
Jacob Rees-Mogg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2019
Reference
666 c936
House
House of Commons

May I urge my right hon. Friend to reconsider the point made by our right hon. Friend the Member for Chingford and Woodford Green (Mr Duncan Smith)? I think we all know that the people who voted against the programme motion tonight did not really want more time to consider...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Business questions
Date
22 October 2019
Reference
666 c936
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for a characteristically good idea as to how we might be able to proceed. The only difficulty is that the programme

motion has been voted down, and to sit in the way my hon. Friend suggests would require another programme motion, and there...

Member
Jacob Rees-Mogg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2019
Reference
666 c936
House
House of Commons