1-20 of 88 results for subject:"Rate limitation"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.309 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.003 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Rate limitation"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Rate limitation" OR subject_t:"Rate capping" OR subject_ses:92742
Type
-
Early day motions (1)
+
Legislation (5)
+
Acts (1)
-
Public acts (1)
+
Bills (1)
+
Public bills (1)
-
Government bills (1)
+
Delegated legislation (3)
-
Statutory instruments (3)
+
Members' contributions (12)
-
Business questions (1)
-
Oral answers to questions (5)
+
Oral questions (5)
-
Prime Minister's questions (1)
-
Proceeding contributions (2)
+
Parliamentary committees (2)
+
Committee proceedings (2)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (2)
+
Parliamentary papers (15)
-
Consultation papers (1)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (1)
-
Deposited papers (15)
+
Parliamentary proceedings (3)
+
Debates (3)
+
Committee proceedings (2)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (2)
+
Legislative debates (3)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (3)
+
Parliamentary questions (58)
-
Business questions (1)
+
Oral questions (5)
-
Prime Minister's questions (1)
-
Written questions (52)
House
Session
Year
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
Letter dated 15/06/2009 from Shahid Malik MP to David Wilshire MP regarding the effect of capping on the Surrey Police Authority. 16 p.
Letter dated 15/06/2009 from Shahid Malik MP to David Wilshire MP regarding the effect of capping on the Surrey Police Authority. 16 p.
Deposited by
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Deposited papers
Author
Department for Communities and Local Government
Committed on
15 June 2009
Originated on
15 June 2009
Received on
17 June 2009
Subjects
Council tax; Billing; Budgeting; Neighbourhood policing; Finance; Local government finance; Police authorities; Rate limitation; Surrey; Surrey Police
Date
15 June 2009
Reference
DEP2009-1723
House
House of Commons
SI 2009/354. Together with an explanatory memorandum and an impact assessment from the Department for Communities and Local Government. Coming into force 1 April 2009.
SI 2009/354. Together with an explanatory memorandum and an impact assessment from the Department for Communities and Local Government. Coming into force 1 April 2009.
Department
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Statutory instruments
Procedure
Negative
Laid on
3 March 2009
Made on
23 February 2009
Coming into force
1 April 2009
Legislation
Non-domestic Rating (Small Business Rate Relief) (England) (Amendment) Order 2009
Subjects
Greater London; Business rates; Small businesses; Rate limitation
Commons Library location
UP 336 2008-09
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
SI 2009/354
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
Modernising empty property relief: summary of consultation replies and government response. 34 p.
Modernising empty property relief: summary of consultation replies and government response. 34 p.
Deposited by
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Consultation papers (Government responses);
Deposited papers
Author
Department for Communities and Local Government
Committed on
17 December 2007
Originated on
17 December 2007
Received on
17 December 2007
Subjects
Clubs; Charities; Delegated legislation; Housing; Enforcement; Empty property; Exemptions; Increases; Markets; Rates and rating; Business rates; Rate limitation; Reform; Tax allowances; Valuation
Date
17 December 2007
Reference
DEP2007-0362
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
The Government will carefully consider the matters raised during the Assembly debate, and welcome views from the Assembly on these matters.
The Government will carefully consider the matters raised during the Assembly debate, and welcome views from the Assembly on these matters.
Answered by
Lord Hanson of Flint
(Labour)
Asked by
Mark Durkan
(Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Answering body
Northern Ireland Grand Committee
Type
Oral answers to questions
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, how he will take account of the resolution of the Assembly on 6th June calling for industrial rated bills to remain capped at 25 per cent.
Subjects
Industry; Northern Ireland; Business rates; Rate limitation
Date
20 June 2006
Reference
NIGC c5
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons Grand Committees
House
House of Commons
I am grateful to my hon. Friend for raising the point as he has. My estimate is that, in the event of the resolution passed by the Assembly being implemented—as opposed to being passed by the Assembly when there is not an Executive—£7 million of revenue will be lost over the next financial year. In the period to 2011, the estimated loss of rates and revenue would be in the region of £60 million. Obviously, that will have an impact, because if the resolution of the Assembly went ahead, £60 million of expenditure planned for the next five years would not be funded.
For my hon. Friend’s benefit, I should say that I welcome the following statement from 2002:
““We therefore support this proposal but acknowledge the requirement to phase it out in a manageable fashion in a timeframe to be negotiated with the sector””.
That was the submission of the Social Democratic and Labour party when we had support for industrial derating at the time of the Assembly. I am sure that the party will stick to that pledge.
I am grateful to my hon. Friend for raising the point as he has. My estimate is that, in the event of the resolution passed by the Assembly being implemented—as opposed to being passed by the Assembly when there is not an Executive—£7 million of revenue will be lost over the next financial year. In the period to 2011, the estimated loss of rates and revenue would be in the region of £60 million. Obviously, that will have an impact, because if the resolution of the Assembly went ahead, £60 million of expenditure planned for the next five years would not be funded.
For my hon. Friend’s benefit, I should say that I welcome the following statement from 2002:
““We therefore support this proposal but acknowledge the requirement to phase it out in a manageable fashion in a timeframe to be negotiated with the sector””.
That was the submission of the Social Democratic and Labour party when we had support for industrial derating at the time of the Assembly. I am sure that the party will stick to that pledge.
Answered by
Lord Hanson of Flint
(Labour)
Asked by
Mark Durkan
(Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Answering body
Northern Ireland Grand Committee
Type
Oral answers to questions
The Minister will be aware that the resolution was passed unanimously on a cross-party and cross-community basis. Even the party that did not take part in the debate agreed with the proposition that industrial rates should be capped at 25 per cent. Will the Minister tell us what the implications of a 25 per cent. cap would be for the Government’s estimated revenue from industrial rates next year, and thereby indicate how comfortably the resolution may be accommodated?
Subjects
Industry; Northern Ireland; Business rates; Rate limitation
Date
20 June 2006
Reference
NIGC c5
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons Grand Committees
House
House of Commons
The Minister will be aware that the resolution was passed unanimously on a cross-party and cross-community basis. Even the party that did not take part in the debate agreed with the proposition that industrial rates should be capped at 25 per cent. Will the Minister tell us what the implications of a 25 per cent. cap would be for the Government’s estimated revenue from industrial rates next year, and thereby indicate how comfortably the resolution may be accommodated?
The Minister will be aware that the resolution was passed unanimously on a cross-party and cross-community basis. Even the party that did not take part in the debate agreed with the proposition that industrial rates should be capped at 25 per cent. Will the Minister tell us what the implications of a 25 per cent. cap would be for the Government’s estimated revenue from industrial rates next year, and thereby indicate how comfortably the resolution may be accommodated?
Asked by
Mark Durkan
(Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Answering body
Northern Ireland Grand Committee
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
20 June 2006
I am grateful to my hon. Friend for raising the point as he has. My estimate is that, in the event of the resolution passed by the Assembly being implemented—as opposed to being passed by the Assembly when there is not an Executive—£7 million of revenue will be lost over the next financial year. In the period to 2011, the estimated loss of rates and revenue would be in the region of £60 million. Obviously, that will have an impact, because if the resolution of the Assembly went ahead, £60 million of expenditure planned for the next five years would not be funded.
For my hon. Friend’s benefit, I should say that I welcome the following statement from 2002:
““We therefore support this proposal but acknowledge the requirement to phase it out in a manageable fashion in a timeframe to be negotiated with the sector””.
That was the submission of the Social Democratic and Labour party when we had support for industrial derating at the time of the Assembly. I am sure that the party will stick to that pledge.
Subjects
Industry; Northern Ireland; Business rates; Rate limitation; Tax yields
Date
20 June 2006
Reference
NIGC c5
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons Grand Committees
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, how he will take account of the resolution of the Assembly on 6th June calling for industrial rated bills to remain capped at 25 per cent.
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, how he will take account of the resolution of the Assembly on 6th June calling for industrial rated bills to remain capped at 25 per cent.
Asked by
Mark Durkan
(Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Answered by
Lord Hanson of Flint
(Labour)
Answering body
Northern Ireland Grand Committee
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Answered on
20 June 2006
The Government will carefully consider the matters raised during the Assembly debate, and welcome views from the Assembly on these matters.
Subjects
Industry; Northern Ireland; Business rates; Rate limitation
Date
20 June 2006
Reference
NIGC c5; 78457
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons Grand Committees
House
House of Commons
To ask the Deputy Prime Minister if he will make a statement on how council tax capping will operate in London in 2006–07.
To ask the Deputy Prime Minister if he will make a statement on how council tax capping will operate in London in 2006–07.
Asked by
Lord Pickles
(Conservative)
Answered by
Phil Woolas
(Labour)
Answering body
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
7 February 2006
For answer on
9 February 2006
Answered on
16 February 2006
No decisions on council tax capping in 2006–07 have been taken yet. The Deputy Prime Minister does not intend to determine capping principles until after authorities have set their budget requirements.
Subjects
Council tax; Greater London; Rate limitation
Date
16 February 2006
Reference
442 c2239W;442 c2239W; 51084
House
House of Commons
SI 2004/3315. Considered by Standing Committee. (Minutes of proceedings at UP 7 2004/05).
SI 2004/3315. Considered by Standing Committee. (Minutes of proceedings at UP 7 2004/05).
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Legislation
Non-domestic Rating (Small Business Rate Relief) (England) Order 2004
Notes
Received 09.02.2005
Subjects
England; Rates and rating; Business rates; Rate limitation; Small businesses; Business improvement districts
Date
8 February 2005
Reference
4th SC on DL
Chamber / Committee
Standing committees
House
House of Commons
SI 2004/3315 (Negative instrument). Coming into force in accordance with article 1.
SI 2004/3315 (Negative instrument). Coming into force in accordance with article 1.
Department
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister
Type
Statutory instruments
Procedure
Negative
Laid on
14 December 2004
Made on
14 December 2004
Coming into force
Coming into force in accordance with article 1
Legislation
Local Government Finance Act 1988; Non-domestic Rating (Small Business Rate Relief) (England) Order 2004
Notes
DEBATE: SC (4TH) 08 FEB 2005
Subjects
Greater London; England; Rates and rating; Business rates; Small businesses; Rate limitation
Commons Library location
UP 172 2004/05
Date
14 December 2004
Reference
SI 2004/3315
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
Draft SI on non-domestic rating (chargeable amounts) (england). Considered by Standing Committee. (Minutes of proceedings at UP 7 2004/05). (Vote).
Draft SI on non-domestic rating (chargeable amounts) (england). Considered by Standing Committee. (Minutes of proceedings at UP 7 2004/05). (Vote).
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Legislation
Non-domestic Rating (Chargeable Amounts) (England) Regulations 2004
Subjects
Business; Rates and rating; Business rates; Rate limitation; Valuation; Valuation Office Agency
Date
13 December 2004
Reference
2nd SC on DL
Chamber / Committee
Standing committees
House
House of Commons
Draft SI on non-domestic rating (chargeable amounts) (england). Lords debate on a motion to approve. Agreed to on question.
Draft SI on non-domestic rating (chargeable amounts) (england). Lords debate on a motion to approve. Agreed to on question.
Lead member
Lord Rooker
Answering member
Baroness Hanham
Department
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Legislation
Non-domestic Rating (Chargeable Amounts) (England) Regulations 2004
Subjects
Disclosure of information; Business premises; Rates and rating; Business rates; Rate limitation; Valuation; Research; Valuation Office Agency
Date
9 December 2004
Reference
667 c1045-51
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Draft SI on non-domestic rating (chargeable amounts) (england). (Affirmative instrument). Together with an explanatory memorandum from the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. Approved by Parliament. Made 21 December 2004 (SI 2004/3387). Coming into force 22 December 2004.
Draft SI on non-domestic rating (chargeable amounts) (england). (Affirmative instrument). Together with an explanatory memorandum from the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. Approved by Parliament. Made 21 December 2004 (SI 2004/3387). Coming into force 22 December 2004.
Department
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister
Type
Statutory instruments
Procedure
Affirmative
Laid on
2 December 2004
Made on
21 December 2004
Coming into force
22 December 2004
Legislation
Local Government Finance Act 1988; Non-domestic Rating (Chargeable Amounts) (England) Regulations 2004
Notes
DEBATE:LH 09 DEC 2004;SC (2ND) 13 DEC 2004;CH 14 DEC 2004
Subjects
Appeals; Business; Certification; Rates and rating; Business rates; Valuation Office Agency; Valuation; Rate limitation
Commons Library location
UP 55 2004/05
Date
2 December 2004
Reference
SI 2004/3387
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions, which local authorities have been rate-capped in each of the last 10 years. - Inc list.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions, which local authorities have been rate-capped in each of the last 10 years. - Inc list.
Asked by
Chris Ruane
(Labour)
Answered by
Lord Whitehead
(Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
22 January 2002
For answer on
30 January 2002
Answered on
30 January 2002
Chris Ruane: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions which local authorities have been
rate-capped in each of the last 10 years. [30475]
Dr. Whitehead: I am able to provide information on English local authorities only. Local government finance is a devolved matter and
capping in Wales is a matter for the National Assembly for Wales.
For the financial years 1991-92 to 2001-02 the following English local authorities were capped for the purposes of the community
charge and council tax:
1991-92
Basildon Bristol Ipswich Lambeth Norwich Stoke-on-Trent Warwickshire county council Wirral
1992-93
Basildon Cheltenham Gloucester Gloucestershire Greenwich Hillingdon Lambeth Warwickshire
1993-94
Castle Point Gloucestershire Harlow
1994-95
City of Sheffield
1995-96
Devon county council Gloucestershire county council Shropshire county council Somerset county council Lincolnshire police authority
Barnsley metropolitan borough City of Newcastle-upon-Tyne City of Sheffield City of Norwich
1996-97
Cambridgeshire county council Oxfordshire county council
1997-98
Oxfordshire county council Somerset county council Warwickshire county council
1998-99
Derbyshire county council
1999-2000
None
2000-01
None
2001-02
None.
Subjects
Council tax capping; Finance; Rate limitation
Date
30 January 2002
Reference
30475; 379 c330-1W;379 c326-7W
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on Carmarthenshire County Council.
1st supplementary on Carmarthenshire County Council.
Asked by
Alan Williams
(Labour)
Answering body
Welsh Grand Committee
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
16 December 1997
Subjects
Local government finance; Rate limitation; Wales; Carmarthenshire County Council
Date
16 December 1997
Reference
WGC c1
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons Grand Committees
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Win Griffiths
(Labour)
Asked by
Alan Williams
(Labour)
Answering body
Welsh Grand Committee
Type
Oral answers to questions
If he will make a statement on rate capping in the local government expenditure decision for 1998-99.
Subjects
Local government finance; Rate limitation; Wales; Carmarthenshire County Council
Date
16 December 1997
Reference
WGC c1
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons Grand Committees
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Win Griffiths
(Labour)
Answering body
Welsh Grand Committee
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Local government finance; Rate limitation; Wales; Carmarthenshire County Council
Date
16 December 1997
Reference
WGC c1
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons Grand Committees
House
House of Commons
If he will make a statement on rate capping in the local government expenditure decision for 1998-99.
If he will make a statement on rate capping in the local government expenditure decision for 1998-99.
Asked by
Alan Williams
(Labour)
Answered by
Win Griffiths
(Labour)
Answering body
Welsh Grand Committee
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Answered on
16 December 1997
Subjects
Local government finance; Rate limitation; Wales; Carmarthenshire County Council
Date
16 December 1997
Reference
19375; WGC c1
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons Grand Committees
House
House of Commons
Statement on plans for allocating total expenditure within his responsibility for 1998-99 including details of the 1998-99 Local Government Finance Settlement. - Inc table.
Statement on plans for allocating total expenditure within his responsibility for 1998-99 including details of the 1998-99 Local Government Finance Settlement. - Inc table.
Asked by
Ernie Ross
(Labour)
Answered by
Donald Dewar
(Labour)
Answering body
Scottish Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
2 December 1997
For answer on
3 December 1997
Answered on
3 December 1997
Mr. Ernie Ross: To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will announce his plans for allocating total expenditure within his
responsibility for 1998-99 including details of the 1998-99 Local Government Finance Settlement. [19298]
Mr. Dewar: The attached table outlines my plans for allocating the total expenditure for Scotland within my responsibility.
I have been able to improve significantly on the plans for the local government settlement. Following extensive consultation with
the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities, I propose to increase the level of Government Supported Expenditure by 2.2 per cent.
over £133 million, and the level of Aggregate External Finance by 0.6 per cent. or £33.1 million, in both cases after adjustments
for the transfer of responsibility for funding nursery education and the additional resources provided in the current year for
policing the Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting.
Next year, Scottish local authorities will receive Government support through AEF of nearly £5.3 billion, £91 million greater than
the published plans, which represents over 37 per cent. of the total Scottish Office budget. On top of that local authorities will
receive a further £75 million of support to fund pre-school education, £9 million more than the published plans, £7 million for
Early Intervention and £1 million for Alternatives to Exclusion, plus £325 million of non-housing capital allocations.
I am also announcing today provisional capping principles which will allow local authorities to increase their capped expenditure by
3.4 per cent. or £191 million, almost £150 million more than the inherited plans. The proposed regime is tiered to allow councils
spending close to GAE a greater increase in expenditure than those spending well above GAE.
Government Supported Expenditure
I propose that Government Supported Expenditure (GSE) for 1998-99 should be set at £6,223.9 million. This compares with previous
plans of £6,132 million.
Grant Aided Expenditure
Local authorities will incur an estimated £728.8 million on loan and leasing charges in 1998-99. After deducting this sum from the
GSE total, £5,495.1 million is available for allocation as Grant Aided Expenditure (GAE). This GAE amount is 3.7 per cent. or almost
£198 million higher than that for the current year (after making the above adjustments). I shall announce GAE figures for individual
local authorities as soon as possible.
Aggregate External Finance
I further propose that Government support for local authority current expenditure-that is, Aggregte External Finance (AEF) which
consists of Revenue Support Grant, Specific Grants and Non-Domestic Rate Income--for 1998-99 should be set at £5,271.3 million,
which compares with the previous plans of £5,180 million. Proposals for the distribution of AEF to individual local authorities are
likely to be isued to councils before Christmas. I announced yesterday that the National Non-Domestic Rate poundage would be 47.4p,
the same as in England.
Capping
I have the power to cap a local authority either where I consider that its planned expenditure is excessive or where there is an
excessive increase in its planned expenditure as compared with the previous year. My provisional capping principles for 1998-99 are:
any increase in budget between 1997-98 and 1998-99 of more than 1.75 per cent. will be an excessive increase if the resulting budget
is above the council's GAE for 1998-99;
any increase in budget between 1997-98 and 1998-99 of more than 1.25 per cent. will be an excessive increase if the resulting budget
is more than 2 per cent. above the council's GAE for 1998-99;
any increase in budget between 1997-98 and 1998-99 of more than 0.75 per cent. will be an excessive increase if the resulting budget
is more than 4 per cent. above the council's GAE for 1998-99;
any budget for 1998-99 more than 12.5 per cent. above the Council's GAE assessment (as admusted if necessary) will be excessive save
that if that budget is no greater than the budget set by that council for 1997-98, the council will not be capped.
The Scottish Office public expenditure plans: Allocations for 1998-99
£ million
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
1997-98 Estimated 1997-98 Planned 1998-99 Planned Changes 1998-99 Revised
outturn Provision Provision Provision
Central government
expenditure (including
public corporations other
than nationalised
industries)
Agriculture, Fisheries and 565 565 538 4.0 542
Food
Industry, enterprise and 592 591 584 -1.3 583
training
Roads and transport 284 282 300 -22.8 277
Housing 268 268 261 39.0 300
Scottish Homes loan book -80 -80 0 -- 0
sale{1}
Scottish Homes debt -59 -59 -48 -- -48
repayment {2}
Other environmental 325 325 321 5.6 327
services
Law, order and protective 479 479 465 -4.4 461
services{3}
Education 1,221 1,219 1,245 5.9 1,251
Arts and libraries 81 81 77 0.3 77
Health 4,393 4,376 4,475 106.6 4,581
Social Work services 61 61 61 3.0 64
Other public services{3} 158 158 146 17.5 163
Total central government 8,289 8,267 8,424 153.4 8,578
expenditure
Local authority capital 568 568 552 -- 552
expenditure (excluding
Water)
of which: 342 342 325 -- 325
Single allocation 180 180 180 -- 180
HRA
Other 45 45 47 -- 47
Provision to match receipts 155 160 176 -52.9 123
from European Social Fund
and European Regional
Development Fund
Central government support 5,255 5,255 5,172 85.6 5,257
to local authorities'
current expenditure{4}
of which:
AEF {5} 5,220 5,220 5,165 87.6 5,252
of which:
Specific grants{6} 412 412 420 -4.0 416
Nationalised industries' 22 22 17 9.5 26
financing limits{7}
Non-Control Total 21 -- -- 74 74
Expenditure from Windfall
Tax
of which:
New Deal for Schools 9 -- -- 27 27
Housing capital receipts 12 -- -- 44 44
initiative
Childcare -- -- -- 3 3
Total expenditure within 14,309 14,271 14,341 269 14,610
the Secretary of State's
responsibilities{8}
of which, the Scottish 13,702 13,685 13,786 182 13,968
Block {9}
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
{1} Reflects the repayment of loans to the National Loans Fund which will fall due in 1997-98 following the delayed disposal of
Scottish Homes portfolio of loans to housing associations. {2} Scottish Homes' repayment of debt from capital receipts. {3} From
1998-99 departments will take on responsibility from PRS for the buildings which the government owns and occupies. From 1998-99 they
will no longer pay rents to PRS, but will pay capital charges on the value of the property. This has resulted in a reduction in
planned expenditure for 1998-99 of some £10 million on the LOPS programme, relating to the Scottish Courts estate, and £10 million
on Other Public Services, relating to the Scottish Office, GRO(S) and SRO estates. {4} Includes Housing Support Grant of £15
million/5 million. {5} AEF comprises revenue support grant, income from non-domestic rates (NDRI) and grants to local authorities
for specific purposes. {6} Specific grants include-police £334 million/£339 million, urban £45 million/£43 million, mental illness
£13 million/£13 million. {7} Includes Caledonian MacBrayne and Highlands and Islands Airports Ltd. {8} As a result of rounding, the
figures may not sum to the totals shown. {9} The Scottish Block comprises all expenditure within the responsibility of the Secretary
of State with the exception of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, and nationalised industries' external financing requirements.
Subjects
Central government; Expenditure; Grants; Local government; Local government finance; Rate limitation; Scotland; Revenue support grant; Scottish Office
Date
3 December 1997
Reference
19298; 302 c215-8W
House
House of Commons
That this House calls upon Her Majesty's Government to exempt from rate capping all local authorities with an annual budget not exceeding ??15 million.
That this House calls upon Her Majesty's Government to exempt from rate capping all local authorities with an annual budget not exceeding ??15 million.
Primary sponsor
Christopher Gill
(Conservative)
Type
Early day motions
Subjects
Local government finance; Rate limitation
Date
4 November 1997
Reference
388
House
House of Commons