Skip to main content

1-20 of 47 results for subject:"Ray, John"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Tragically, John Ray infant school, one of the largest infant schools in Braintree, burnt down a few days ago. Will the Prime Minister join me in thanking Essex county council for the speed with which it found alternative accommodation for the children, and in welcoming the encouraging news that the school is to be rebuilt as soon as possible?

Asked by
Brooks Newmark (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 September 2013
Reference
567 c976
House
House of Commons

I certainly join my hon. Friend in praising his county council. That does sound like a tragic event, and it comes on top of the fact that, as everyone knows, we need to provide more primary school places. I commend the council for its quick action.

Answered by
Lord Cameron of Chipping Norton (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 September 2013
Reference
567 c976
House
House of Commons

That this House welcomes the leader in The Times on 15th July which called for adequate compensation to be paid to the three guardsmen, Adrian Hicks, Sean Povey and John Ray, who lost their legs in a training exercise in July 1989; recognises the support given for compensation by a...

Primary sponsor
David Winnick (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
15 July 1991
Reference
1134
House
House of Commons

What is the estimated present value equivalent award of the sum he gave to the House in the Adjournment Debate on 3rd June, Official Report 192 c129-36, assuming death occurs at age 25, 35, 45 and 55 years.

Asked by
John Browne (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 July 1991
Reference
194 c402W;194 c400W
House
House of Commons
Deposited by
Ministry of Defence
Type
Deposited papers
Date
4 July 1991
Reference
Dep 7186
House
House of Commons

Pursuant to 193 c402W, how many special socks have been provided to Guardsmen Povey, Hicks & Ray; & if he will make it his policy to supply such special socks free on demand. (Holding answer 24 June 1991).

Asked by
David Winnick (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 July 1991
Reference
194 c81-2W;194 c81W
House
House of Commons

Pursuant to the Answer of 25th June to the honourable Member for Bristol East, at 193 c453-4W, what action had been taken, or will be taken, to prevent the recurrence of the accident in July 1989 to the Grenadier Guardsmen, Hicks, Povey and Ray.

Asked by
David Winnick (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 July 1991
Reference
194 c81W
House
House of Commons

Pursuant to 193 c453W, if he will place in the Library a copy of the transcript of the interview with Lance Corporal Ray at Medicine Hat City Hospital, Canada.

Asked by
David Winnick (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 June 1991
Reference
193 c580W;193 c592W
House
House of Commons

What steps have been taken by his Department to trace the origin of the munition that exploded in July 1989 in Suffield, Canada, causing the injuries suffered by Guardsmen Hicks, Povey and Ray.

Asked by
David Winnick (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 June 1991
Reference
193 c579W;193 c591W
House
House of Commons

If he will ask Guardsmen Hicks, Povey and Ray to make a further statement on the events in July 1989 in Suffield, Canada; & arrange for Povey & Hicks to be interviewed.

Asked by
David Winnick (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 June 1991
Reference
193 c579W;193 c591W
House
House of Commons

Why the proceedings of the Board of Inquiry into the accident during a training exercise in July 1989 at Suffield, Canada, are classified as restricted.

Asked by
David Winnick (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 June 1991
Reference
193 c579W;193 c591W
House
House of Commons

Whether guardsmen on the training exercise in July 1989 at Suffield, Canada, were properly briefed on the possibility of unexploded munitions. - Board of inquiry concluded they were.

Asked by
David Winnick (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 June 1991
Reference
193 c579W;193 c591W
House
House of Commons

What steps he has taken to assure himself that the Board of Inquiry held in Canada after the accident in July 1989 at Suffield, examined all the relevant facts pertaining to his Department's responsibility for the safety of their employees. - Ref to 193 c347-8W.

Asked by
David Winnick (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 June 1991
Reference
193 c580W;193 c592W
House
House of Commons

Pursuant to 193 c454W, if he will state the name and rank of the senior officer in the Grenadier Guards who has made representations to him over Guardsmen Povey, Hicks and Ray. - Major General (Ret'd) BC Gordon Lennox CB MBE, regimental lieutenant-colonel of Grenadier Guards.

Asked by
David Winnick (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 June 1991
Reference
193 c579-80W;193 c591-2W
House
House of Commons

Whether the convening order for the Army Board of Inquiry into events of 7th July 1989 on the Batus range required investigation into the question as to why a round remained uncleared outside an impact area on the Batus live firing range. - The convening order directed the board of...

Asked by
John Browne (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 June 1991
Reference
193 c452-3W;193 c464-5W
House
House of Commons

Under what terms of reference the Board of Inquiry was set up that inquired into the cases of Guardsmen Hicks, Povey and Ray. - Details given.

Asked by
Jonathan Sayeed (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 June 1991
Reference
193 c453-4W;193 c465-6W
House
House of Commons

What informal undertakings were given after the serious injuries affecting Guardsmen Povey, Hicks and Ray in July 1989, that compensation would be paid to them. - MOD is aware of none. If any such undertakings were given, they were without authorisation.

Asked by
David Winnick (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 June 1991
Reference
193 c453W;193 c465W
House
House of Commons

Whether Guardsmen Povey, Hicks and Ray were requested to give evidence before the Board of Inquiry into the circumstances which led to their serious injuries in July 1989.

Asked by
David Winnick (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 June 1991
Reference
193 c453W;193 c465W
House
House of Commons

Whether the board of inquiry into the Grenadier accident at Batus of 7th July 1989 was (a) ordered to investigate and (b) took any evidence as to how an unexploded round lay uncleared on the Batus range before 7th July 1989.

Asked by
John Browne (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 June 1991
Reference
193 c452W;193 c464W
House
House of Commons

How many special socks have been provided to Guardsmen Povey, Hicks and Ray; and if he will make it his policy to supply such special socks free on demand. - Sec of State for Health will reply shortly. (Answer given at 194 c81-2w).

Asked by
David Winnick (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 June 1991
Reference
193 c402W;193 c414W
House
House of Commons