1-5 of 5 results for subject:"Receiver of Wreck"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.254 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.001 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Receiver of Wreck"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Receiver of Wreck" OR subject_ses:66022
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
1st supplementary on archaeological finds being exhibited locally.
1st supplementary on archaeological finds being exhibited locally.
Asked by
Lord Bridges
(Crossbench)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
14 March 2001
Subjects
Archaeology; Museums and galleries; Weapons; Wrecks; Royal Armouries; Receiver of Wreck
Date
14 March 2001
Reference
623 c841
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Lord McIntosh of Haringey
(Labour)
Asked by
Lord Bridges
(Crossbench)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Why the Royal Armouries, acting on the authority of the Receiver of Wreck, forcibly removed an historic cannon of 16th century Spanish ordnance from the premises of Suffolk Underwater Studies at Orford on 12 February before any agreement had been reached regarding the custody of the cannon.
Subjects
Archaeology; Museums and galleries; Weapons; Wrecks; Royal Armouries; Receiver of Wreck
Date
14 March 2001
Reference
623 c841
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Lord McIntosh of Haringey
(Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Archaeology; Museums and galleries; Weapons; Wrecks; Royal Armouries; Receiver of Wreck
Date
14 March 2001
Reference
623 c841
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Why the Royal Armouries, acting on the authority of the Receiver of Wreck, forcibly removed an historic cannon of 16th century Spanish ordnance from the premises of Suffolk Underwater Studies at Orford on 12 February before any agreement had been reached regarding the custody of the cannon.
Why the Royal Armouries, acting on the authority of the Receiver of Wreck, forcibly removed an historic cannon of 16th century Spanish ordnance from the premises of Suffolk Underwater Studies at Orford on 12 February before any agreement had been reached regarding the custody of the cannon.
Asked by
Lord Bridges
(Crossbench)
Answered by
Lord McIntosh of Haringey
(Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
14 March 2001
Answered on
14 March 2001
Subjects
Archaeology; Museums and galleries; Weapons; Wrecks; Royal Armouries; Receiver of Wreck
Date
14 March 2001
Reference
623 c841
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
If he will list for each of the last five years (a) the number of staff employed and (b) the total cost to his Department in respect of responsibilities for Fishes Royal and how much has been received in respect of the disposal for Fishes Roya. - Text of letter...
If he will list for each of the last five years (a) the number of staff employed and (b) the total cost to his Department in respect of responsibilities for Fishes Royal and how much has been received in respect of the disposal for Fishes Roya. - Text of letter...
Asked by
Martin Redmond
(Labour)
Answered by
Steve Norris
(Conservative)
Answering body
Coastguard Agency
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
29 April 1996
Answered on
29 April 1996
Subjects
Costs; Executive agencies; Staff; Wrecks; Receiver of Wreck
Date
29 April 1996
Reference
276 c355W;276 c357W; 26700;26702
House
House of Commons