Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,066 results for subject:"Recovery of costs"

Type

+ Legislation (39) + Acts (1)
-
Public acts (1)
+ Bills (3) + Public bills (3)
-
Government bills (1)
+ Private members' bills (2)
-
Presentation bills (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (35)
-
Statutory instruments (35)
+ Members' contributions (818)
-
Oral answers to questions (19)
-
Oral question time interventions (2)
-
Oral questions (18)
-
Proceeding contributions (779)
+ Parliamentary committees (23) + Committee proceedings (19)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (1)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (3)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (9)
-
Select Committee reports (1)
-
Select Committee written evidence (3)
+ Parliamentary papers (26)
-
Command papers (5)
-
Consultation papers (7)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (3)
-
Deposited papers (14)
-
House of Commons papers (3)
-
Impact assessments (2)
-
Unprinted papers (2)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (51) + Debates (36) + Committee proceedings (19)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (1)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (3)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (9)
+ Legislative debates (33)
-
Debates on bills (29)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (4)
-
Questions for short debate (2)
+ Formal proceedings (1)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (1)
+ Statements (14) + Oral statements (3)
-
Ministerial statements (3)
-
Written statements (11)
+ Parliamentary questions (145)
-
Oral questions (18)
-
Written questions (127)
+ Research briefings (2)
-
Commons Briefing papers (2)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what estimate she has made of the value of payments and inducements accepted by Michael Misick and his co-defendants; and what proportion of that sum her Department expects to be recovered through confiscation orders following the February 2026...

Asked by
Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Labour)
Answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 July 2026
Reference
18133
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what discussions his Department has had with the Civil Procedure Rules Committee on the implementation of fixed recoverable costs for lower value clinical negligence claims since 4 July 2024.

Asked by
Joe Robertson (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 February 2026
Reference
111994
House
House of Commons

Lords committee stage second day. Schedule 2 agreed to. Clauses 8 to 18 agreed to. Bill reported without amendment.

Lead member
Baroness Levitt
Answering member
Lord Sandhurst
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HL)
Notes
Welsh legislative consent sought.
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc236-291
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Sandhurst

48: Schedule 2, page 22, line 6, leave out from “in” to end of line 13 and insert “Schedule 6A.”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment broadens the cohort to whom Section 35 (victims’ rights to make representations and receive information) of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004 applies...

Member
Lord Sandhurst (Crossbench; Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 c236
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendments 48 to 54, in my name and that of my noble and learned friend Lord Keen of Elie, concern the operation of the victim contact scheme and the new helpline provisions

introduced by the Bill, and in particular the Government’s decision to structure eligibility around the three-part...

Member
Lord Sandhurst (Crossbench; Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc237-241
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Sandhurst, for outlining the detail of the amendments in this group. I was slightly surprised by what he said, because I understood that it was not about whether a prison term was suspended or not, it was the conviction...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 c241
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for the opportunity of setting out the Government’s

position. Our approach is carefully considered. I regret that the noble Lord, Lord Sandhurst, seeks to make party-political points out of this by using language such as “insult to victims”, particularly when, in relation to the principal...

Member
Baroness Levitt (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc238-243
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I addressed this at some length in opening. I am grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton, and the Minister for correcting my errors. I shall add nothing more. I am also grateful for the Minister’s explanation of how—she hopes, at least—this will work in practice. On that...

Member
Lord Sandhurst (Crossbench; Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 c243
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Sandhurst

58: Before Clause 8, insert the following new Clause—

“Functions of Commissioner: protecting those assisting victims of crime

(1) Section 49 (General functions of Commissioner) of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004 is amended as follows.

(2) After subsection (1)(a) insert—

“(aa) take such steps as the Commissioner considers appropriate...

Member
Lord Sandhurst (Crossbench; Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 c243
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendments 58, 59 and 60 are intended to strengthen the role of the Victims’ Commissioner. They would ensure that the commissioner can more effectively promote the interests of victims and witnesses and respond to cases that have wider public policy relevance.

Amendment 58 clarifies that

“the Victims’ Commissioner may take...

Member
Lord Sandhurst (Crossbench; Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc243-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Sandhurst, for tabling these amendments and to the Government for the expansion of the Victims’ Commissioner’s powers as set out in the Bill.

However, there are some broader issues that it might be helpful to air here, which are not...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 c245
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very doubtful about Amendment 58. It would expand the role of the Victims’ Commissioner very substantially indeed if the Victims’ Commissioner is going to take action to support or protect individuals who act in good faith to assist victims of crime. That would involve a great...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc245-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Government firmly believe that the Victims’ Commissioner—I have known the current occupant of the role for many years and have the utmost regard for her—has a crucial strategic role in representing the interests of victims and the witnesses of crime and anti-social behaviour.

Amendment 58 would significantly widen...

Member
Baroness Levitt (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc246-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I listened with interest to what the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton, had to say, and indeed to the noble Lord, Lord Pannick. I encourage the Minister to listen with care to what the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton, said and perhaps to move our way on certain aspects.

Dealing with...

Member
Lord Sandhurst (Crossbench; Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 c247
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord seems to be suggesting that the Victims’ Commissioner does not now engage with individual cases. My understanding is that she very much does, but to feed towards her statutory role. That is quite different from getting involved in the minutiae of an individual case, supporting a victim...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 c248
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there is clearly a balance to be struck. I think we should, as we go forward, because we all have the same interests at heart here, look carefully at whether there will be occasions when the commissioner should look at individual cases, not so much to interfere but...

Member
Lord Sandhurst (Crossbench; Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 c246
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I oppose the Question that Clause 11 stand part of the Bill. This clause seeks to extend the right to prosecute to those with different qualifications from solicitors or barristers.

As my noble friend Lord Gove highlighted at Second Reading, the Crown Prosecution Service faces constraints in whom it...

Member
Lord Sandhurst (Crossbench; Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc248-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will make one or two brief observations about this, if I may. First, I must declare an interest, in that about 10 years ago I was made an honorary vice-president of CILEX. In case it is thought that I am speaking with the interests of CILEX in...

Member
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc249-250
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I entirely agree with what the noble and learned Lord, Lord Thomas has said. I shall add some observations. It is self-evident, as the noble Lord, Lord Sandhurst, says, that only those who are qualified and competent should be responsible for prosecutions, and no one would dispute that....

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 c250
House
House of Lords

The noble and learned Lord has said what I wanted to say much more sensitively and tactfully, but I will say what I was going to say.

There is a danger that lawyers of my generation— I shall just apply it to my generation and not suggest which generation other Members...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc250-249
House
House of Lords