1-5 of 5 results for subject:"Riddick, Graham"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.281 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.002 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Riddick, Graham"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Riddick, Graham" OR subject_t:"Graham Riddick" OR subject_ses:303215
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
That this House congratulates the honourable Member for Colne Valley on his success with his complaint to the Press Complaints Commission against the Sunday Times; notes that the Press Complaints Commission found that there was no justification for the Sunday Times use of subterfuge, that the newspaper should have made clear to its readers that its approach to the honourable Member for Colne Valley had been on the basis of an entirely legitimate consultancy, not on the basis of a one-off payment in return for asking a question, that the approach to Conservative honourable Members was entirely different to the approach made to Labour honourable Members, and that the Sunday Times failed to tell its readers the truth about the honourable Member for Colne Valley's return of a cheque and the issue of who raised the subject of payments first; is amazed that the response of the editor of the Sunday Times, Mr John Witherow, a member of the Press Complaints Commission, was to say that his newspaper had only been criticised on a couple of minor points; believes that if self-regulation is to mean anything editors should accept the adjudications of the Press Complaints Commission; and questions whether Mr Rupert Murdoch is as dismissive of the Press Complaints Commission as his editor.
That this House congratulates the honourable Member for Colne Valley on his success with his complaint to the Press Complaints Commission against the Sunday Times; notes that the Press Complaints Commission found that there was no justification for the Sunday Times use of subterfuge, that the newspaper should have made...
Debate on motion to approve Committee of Privileges first report (HC 351) and proposing the suspension of Members for Colne Valley and Bosworth. Agreed to on question.
Debate on motion to approve Committee of Privileges first report (HC 351) and proposing the suspension of Members for Colne Valley and Bosworth. Agreed to on question.
Debate on a motion that the matter of the complaint, together with the issues referred to in the statement by the Speaker on 12 July (on the Sunday Times newspaper of alleged financial inducements to Members) be referred to the Committee of Privileges. Agreed to on question.
Debate on a motion that the matter of the complaint, together with the issues referred to in the statement by the Speaker on 12 July (on the Sunday Times newspaper of alleged financial inducements to Members) be referred to the Committee of Privileges. Agreed to on question.
That this House unreservedly condemns the irresponsible and anti-democratic comments made in an Oral Question to the Prime Minister by the honourable Member for Colne Valley that there is now a case for turning the poll tax into exactly that- for taking the vote away from people who have not paid their community charge and giving it back to them only when they have done so (Official Report, 23rd October, column 187); notes with dismay that the Prime Minister failed to condemn this unprincipled remark; and further notes that the operation of the poll tax has already had an impact upon the sanctity and comprehensiveness of the franchise in that the interconnections of the poll tax and electoral registers has been a key factor in the shortfall of the numbers of people on the electoral register, including the alarming fall of 8.5 per cent. in the franchise in Finchley in the last two years.
That this House unreservedly condemns the irresponsible and anti-democratic comments made in an Oral Question to the Prime Minister by the honourable Member for Colne Valley that there is now a case for turning the poll tax into exactly that- for taking the vote away from people who have not...