Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,043 results for subject:"Scheduled offences"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I have listened with great care to the debate and it is clear that none of us welcomes the order before us. The Government have informed us, and it has been endorsed by noble Lords, that it has been brought forward because of necessity. The Minister’s comments on...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2011
Reference
729 c97-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I offer reluctant but strong support to the noble Lord, Lord Shutt. It may or may not be a comfort to him to know that he stands in a long line of Liberal Ministers, going back to Mr Gladstone in the 19th century, who have been perplexed by...

Member
Lord Bew (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2011
Reference
729 c96-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have taken part in this debate. I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Cormack, for speaking about his experience in the House of Commons of dealing with Northern Ireland matters and I note that he spoke about people’s fears. I am...

Member
Lord Shutt of Greetland (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2011
Reference
729 c98-100
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I strongly support the speech of my noble friend. Noble Lords will know that I was chairman of the Northern Ireland Affairs Select Committee for five years before the last general election, and in that capacity conducted inquiries into organised crime, among other things. When we conducted our...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2011
Reference
729 c91-2
House
House of Lords

This was a limited consultation in terms of the numbers invited, but all political parties based in Northern Ireland were invited, as well as the Committee on the Administration of Justice and the noble Lord, Lord Carlile. There was not a 100 per cent return in terms of invitations to...

Member
Lord Shutt of Greetland (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2011
Reference
729 c91
House
House of Lords

The Minister has just given us the views of various people. Were representations and expressions of view given by persons, organisations or political parties in Northern Ireland? What was the balance in those representations in favour of continuing with non-jury trials or otherwise?

Member
Lord Trimble (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2011
Reference
729 c91
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to my noble friend for intervening, but in a sense he is already engaging in the process that I was suggesting. I was not suggesting that we immediately jump to that suggestion or any other, but rather that we should engage in a proper process of debate...

Member
Lord Alderdice (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2011
Reference
729 c96
House
House of Lords

To some extent I considerably disagree with the noble Lord’s proposition. I understand where he is coming from but I feel that psychologically to impose a permanent trial system without judges, a Diplock court system, is admitting defeat. I am still an optimist, even now. I still think that we...

Member
Lord Glentoran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2011
Reference
729 c95-6
House
House of Lords

As ever the noble Lord is alert and well ahead of the argument. There is a case that, rather than waiting for two years, when we would have little opportunity but possibly a modest consultation and a repeat of the order, perhaps after only one year there could be a...

Member
Lord Alderdice (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2011
Reference
729 c95
House
House of Lords

I want to make sure that I understand what the noble Lord is saying. Is he saying that instead of coming back in two years’ time for another renewal, which in theory could go on indefinitely, we move to a transition proposal? As Dr Johnson said, there is nothing as...

Member
Lord Empey (Ulster Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2011
Reference
729 c95
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend for outlining the background to the order. I should like to pick up one or two of the comments. Like other noble Lords, of course I regret the fact that it is necessary for this order to come forward again. Perhaps,...

Member
Lord Alderdice (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2011
Reference
729 c93-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I did not intend to come into this debate, but the noble Lord, Lord Maginnis, said two things that worry me. He suggested that the PSNI is getting complacent. I do not believe that to be true. It is under threat continuously. He and I have met widows...

Member
Lord Glentoran (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2011
Reference
729 c93
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the Motion before the House, albeit with some disappointment, as one who 13 years ago sat beside the noble Lord, Lord Trimble, during negotiations and hoped that we would no longer, and certainly not at this stage, have non-jury trials. However, a number of people in...

Member
Lord Maginnis of Drumglass (Ulster Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2011
Reference
729 c92-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House does approve the draft Justice and Security (Northern Ireland) Act 2007 (Extension of duration of non-jury trial provisions) Order 2011. This order further extends for two years the period during which trials without jury can take place in certain circumstances in...

Member
Lord Shutt of Greetland (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2011
Reference
729 c89-91
House
House of Lords

That the draft order laid before the House on 5 April be approved. Relevant document: 20th Report from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments

Member
Lord Shutt of Greetland (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2011
Reference
729 c89
House
House of Lords

Draft Justice and Security (Northern Ireland) Act 2007 (Extension of duration of non-jury trial provisions) Order 2011 (SI 2011/1720). Lords debate on a motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Shutt of Greetland
Answering member
Baroness Smith of Basildon
Department
Northern Ireland Office
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
4 July 2011
Reference
729 c89-100
House
House of Lords

Fourteenth Sitting (afternoon). Clauses 78 to 89 agreed to. Schedule 6, discussed with Government new clause 4 (Pre-charge detention: minor amendments), and Government new schedule 2 (Disclosure and the intelligence services: consequential amendments), agreed to as amended. Clauses 90 to 92 agreed to. Government new clause 4 agreed to. Government...

Type
Public Bill Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Date
15 May 2008
Reference
PBC
House
House of Commons

I think that the Division Bell indicated that I should be brief—I shall be. We need legislation that is fit for purpose in dealing with the renewed international threat that we now face, and I believe that the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005, the Justice and Security (Northern Ireland) Act...

Member
Lord Browne of Belmont (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2007
Reference
694 c12GC
House
House of Lords

I, too, thank the Minister for his elucidation of the order, which he did with characteristic aplomb. I also endorse what the noble Viscount, Lord Bridgeman, has said. It is clearly necessary to have transitional provisions. All dates are arbitrary; there is nothing special about the end of July. I...

Member
Lord Smith of Clifton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2007
Reference
694 c11GC
House
House of Lords

I am most grateful to the Minister for his comprehensive explanation of the order. It marks the continuing normalisation process in Northern Ireland, which is very welcome and must be maintained. I also welcome the fact that such a move is now possible. How many cases are in progress and...

Member
Viscount Bridgeman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2007
Reference
694 c10-1GC
House
House of Lords