Skip to main content

1-20 of 147 results for subject:"Service Prosecuting Authority"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Defence Committee
Date
2 December 2025
House
House of Commons

Under section 364 of the Armed Forces Act 2006 the Director of Service Prosecutions is appointed by His Majesty the King. The term of the current incumbent, Jonathan Rees KC, came to an end on 31 October 2025.

I can inform the House that His Majesty has appointed Mary Cowe...

Member
Louise Sandher-Jones (Labour)
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written statements
Date
20 November 2025
Reference
HCWS1078
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Defence (Louise Sandher-Jones) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.

Under section 364 of the Armed Forces Act 2006 the Director of Service Prosecutions is appointed by His Majesty the King. The term of the current incumbent, Jonathan Rees KC, came to...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written statements
Date
20 November 2025
Reference
HLWS1079
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, when the next inspection of the (a) Service Police and (b) Service Prosecuting Authority by the Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate is.

Asked by
Luke Pollard (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 January 2024
Reference
10355
House
House of Commons

Letter dated 11/01/2024 from Andrew Murrison MP to John Healey MP in response to Written Parliamentary Questions regarding how many cases of sexual assault, sexual harassment and rape resulted in charges and Court Martials in connection with incidents involving Armed Forces personnel serving at Army colleges, and how many cases...

Deposited by
Ministry of Defence
Type
Deposited papers
Date
11 January 2024
Reference
DEP2024-0038
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how much the Service Prosecuting Authority spent on equality and diversity training in the 2022-23 financial year.

Asked by
Julian Knight (Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 October 2023
Reference
202418
House
House of Commons

I feel almost Gilbertian in this Gilbert and Sullivan-esque interchanging of roles.

My Lords, this statutory instrument consists of three changes to the rules that apply to the service courts: to provide an overriding objective for court martial, the Service Civilian Court and the Summary Appeal Court; to give the Director...

Member
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2022
Reference
824 cc210-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in supporting this draft SI and accepting that revision is not an option, I still have a couple of points to raise. The overriding objective introduced in all three types of service court seems, on first reading, to be almost entirely motherhood and apple pie, or should almost...

Member
Lord Craig of Radley (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2022
Reference
824 c211GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, like the noble and gallant Lord, Lord Craig of Radley, on reading the overriding objective as outlined in the statutory instrument, my sense was that it appears in some ways to be motherhood and apple pie. It would seem self-evident that an overriding objective should be that cases...

Member
Baroness Smith of Newnham (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2022
Reference
824 c213GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I presume that prior to the very welcome rules female board members were never present. Was that the case? I am looking at Rule 3A(1). How often do these boards sit? One presumes it is as events dictate, but how many are there in the average year? What...

Member
Lord Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2022
Reference
824 c213GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not wish simply to make things up. I have very little to say on this. However, the amendments to the rules that the Government have brought forward are important. I agree with the noble and gallant Lord, Lord Craig, the noble Baroness, Lady Smith, and my...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2022
Reference
824 cc213-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was in the process of welcoming the Armed Forces (Service Court Rules) (Amendment) (No. 2) Rules 2022, in particular their adoption of the recommendations of His Honour Shaun Lyons—we are pleased about that.

I was also congratulating the Minister on the MoD’s including the European Convention on Human...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2022
Reference
824 c214GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, once again we have had an interesting debate. In many respects this has been a more technical SI than the earlier one, but none the less, it has generated points of interest and I will do my level best to address them.

The noble and gallant Lord, Lord Craig,...

Member
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2022
Reference
824 c215GC
House
House of Lords

Just to be clear, is the Minister saying to the Committee that the Judge Advocate-General has the say and, regardless of whether the Secretary of State agrees with him, the Judge Advocate- General wins?

Member
Lord Craig of Radley (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2022
Reference
824 c215GC
House
House of Lords

That is what I am saying. Indeed, I add to that by observing that it would be profoundly undesirable if the Secretary of State, as a government Minister, were getting involved in the discharge of justice under what should be an independent criminal justice system, albeit within the services justice...

Member
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2022
Reference
824 cc215-6GC
House
House of Lords

This is a really important point, which, as I said, the noble Baroness, Lady Smith, and I were discussing. If somebody outside this Committee read our proceedings and saw the word “lay” they would assume that these people are members of the

public, even though the instrument deals with non-service...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2022
Reference
824 c216GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord. We are sometimes guilty of using vocabulary in the environment with which we are all familiar. These are lay members who are not legally qualified; they sit as a presence roughly comparable to a jury. The noble Lord is right that they are “lay” not...

Member
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2022
Reference
824 c217GC
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Goldie
Answering member
Lord Coaker
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
18 October 2022
Reference
824 cc210-7GC
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many staff there have been in the Service Prosecution Authority in each year since 2010.

Asked by
John Healey (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 July 2022
Reference
31717
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the annual budget for the Service Prosecution Authority was in each year since 2010.

Asked by
John Healey (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 July 2022
Reference
31716
House
House of Commons