1-20 of 42 results for subject:"Sex offender treatment programme"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.225 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.003 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Sex offender treatment programme"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Sex offender treatment programme" OR subject_t:SOTP OR subject_ses:12759
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how much it has cost his Department to deliver the (a) Core Sex Offender Treatment and (b) Extended Sex Offender Treatment programme in the last 12 months; and how many people have participated with what outcomes in each such programme in the...
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how much it has cost his Department to deliver the (a) Core Sex Offender Treatment and (b) Extended Sex Offender Treatment programme in the last 12 months; and how many people have participated with what outcomes in each such programme in the...
We are absolutely committed to reducing reoffending and addressing the needs of those individuals convicted of a sexual offence.
Her Majestyâs Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) does not record expenditure in its central accounting system in a format that allows for the identification of spend on Sex Offender Treatment Programmes and therefore, cannot provide cost data for the period requested.
The NOMS Annual Digest 2016/17 provides information on volumes of sex offender programmes delivered in 2016/17. This is included in the table below.
In April 2017 the final core and extended SOTP programmes completed and we stopped the programme and introduced new programmes. No offenders took part in the programme after April 2017.
The new programmes are Horizon (Moderate Intensity) and Kaizen SO (High Intensity), which we have introduced for men convicted of sexual offending.
These programmes draw on the latest international evidence on effective treatment for this cohort of offenders.
Table: Accredited Sexual Offending Programme Starts and Completions in Prison, England & Wales 2016/17 | ||
|
|
|
| Starts | Completions |
|
|
|
Core Programme | 527 | 594 |
Extended Programme | 133 | 128 |
|
|
|
All Sexual Offending Programmes | 1,173 | 1,171 |
|
|
|
It should be noted that some of those completing a programme in 2016/17 will have started it in the preceding year, and some starting in 2016/17 will complete in the subsequent year.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 29 January 2018 to Question 124275, on Sex Offender Treatment Programme, in what number of cases the Parole Board has taken account of the completion of the sex offender treatment programme when making a decision on whether...
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 29 January 2018 to Question 124275, on Sex Offender Treatment Programme, in what number of cases the Parole Board has taken account of the completion of the sex offender treatment programme when making a decision on whether...
The Parole Board collects data on release decisions according to sentence types. To provide the information requested would require the analysis of individual release decisions and could only be obtained at disproportionate cost.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, when the Parole Board stopped taking into account completion of the sex offender treatment programme in assessing the suitability of prisoners for release.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, when the Parole Board stopped taking into account completion of the sex offender treatment programme in assessing the suitability of prisoners for release.
The Parole Board has not stopped taking into account completion of the sex offender treatment programme in assessing the suitability of prisoners for release. The Board may only direct release of a prisoner if it is satisfied that it is no longer necessary for the protection of the public that the prisoner should remain detained.
When making its decision, the Parole Board will consider all evidence presented to it. Attendance on offending behaviour courses - including sex offender treatment programmes - is just one of the factors Parole Board panels consider.
Some of the evidence considered by the panel includes, but is not limited to, details of offences, previous convictions, sentencing remarks, assessment of an experienced probation officer, the offenders’ own comments; as well as reports from psychiatrists, psychologists, security experts, prison staff, substance misuse workers, and staff on behaviour management programmes. The offender also has an opportunity to make a statement, as do victims. Before release is directed, the Parole Board will also satisfy itself that a comprehensive resettlement plan is in place.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, when the review into the Sex Offender Treatment Programme was commissioned; and which Minister commissioned that review.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, when the review into the Sex Offender Treatment Programme was commissioned; and which Minister commissioned that review.
The recently published study in to Core Sex Offender Treatment Programmes was commissioned in December 2014 by the then MOJ Director of Analysis as part of ongoing evaluative work undertaken by the Department.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to his Department's report, Impact evaluation of the prison-based Core Sex Offender Treatment Programme, published on 30 June 2017, when the decision was made to halt that programme.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to his Department's report, Impact evaluation of the prison-based Core Sex Offender Treatment Programme, published on 30 June 2017, when the decision was made to halt that programme.
The HM Prison and Probation Service Executive Committee took the operational decision to cease delivery of the Core and Extended Sex Offender Treatment Programmes and accelerate transition to the Horizon and Kaizen programmes in February 2017 following receipt of the peer reviewed evaluation report and advice from the independent Correctional Services Accreditation and Advisory Panel.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the reasons are for the time taken to publish the report, entitled Impact evaluation of the prison-based Core Sex Offender Treatment Programme, published on 30 June 2017.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the reasons are for the time taken to publish the report, entitled Impact evaluation of the prison-based Core Sex Offender Treatment Programme, published on 30 June 2017.
Ministers were informed of the outcomes of the evaluation and the planned operational response in February 2017. The report was published on 30 June, shortly after the pre-election period.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many convicted sex offenders have (a) started and (b) completed the Sex Offender Treatment Programme; and of those offenders how many are (i) in prison, (ii) released and (iii) in a bail hostel.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many convicted sex offenders have (a) started and (b) completed the Sex Offender Treatment Programme; and of those offenders how many are (i) in prison, (ii) released and (iii) in a bail hostel.
Information on the numbers of convicted sex offenders who have (a) started and (b) completed the Sex Offender Treatment Programmes is published annually. The data until 2015/16 is available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/547224/supplementary-tables.zip. Data for the period 2016 / 17 due to be published on 27July 2017.
Information on the current locations of former participants in the Core Sex Offender Treatment Programme is held on individual offender files. The information requested could therefore be provided only at disproportionate cost.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether homosexual prisoners taking part in the Sex Offender Treatment Programme delivered at HM Prison Northumberland are having additional weighting points allocated on the grounds of their sexual orientation; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether homosexual prisoners taking part in the Sex Offender Treatment Programme delivered at HM Prison Northumberland are having additional weighting points allocated on the grounds of their sexual orientation; and if he will make a statement.
National Offender Management Service does not, as part of the Sex Offender Treatment Programme, use a prisoner's sexual orientation when coding and allocating them to a particular risk level.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many (a) sex offenders and (b) sex offender treatment programme places there were in each prison in each of the last four years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many (a) sex offenders and (b) sex offender treatment programme places there were in each prison in each of the last four years.
It has not been possible to answer this question within the time available. I will write to the right hon. Gentleman as soon as possible.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many prisoners undertook the (a) Core Sex Offender Treatment Programme, (b) Extended Sex Offender Treatment Programme, (c) Healthy Sex Programme, (d) Becoming New Me Programme, (e) New Me Coping Programme, (f) Living as New Me Programme and (g) all sex offender...
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many prisoners undertook the (a) Core Sex Offender Treatment Programme, (b) Extended Sex Offender Treatment Programme, (c) Healthy Sex Programme, (d) Becoming New Me Programme, (e) New Me Coping Programme, (f) Living as New Me Programme and (g) all sex offender...
We provide a range of programmes for this highly complex group of offenders. These are tailored to address an individual's risk and need, and can also include substance misuse, anger management and violence reduction. Sex offender treatment programmes are not suitable for every prisoner. In each case a thorough assessment will be carried out. We are looking to make sure that the resources we are targeting specifically towards sex offenders deal with the highest risk sex offenders and have created the Sex Offender Management Board to address this. This should lead to increased high risk sex offenders accessing programmes. A greater focus has been placed on higher risk offenders who pose the greatest risk of harm to the public and this therefore requires investment in lengthier more expensive programmes which offer greater benefit to the public. This may result in a reduction in overall places but represents a better investment in public protection. This is why simply looking at the number of starts or completions does not tell the full story. The following table sets out the number of prisoners by establishment and in total who started each of the named programmes in the financial years 2009-10 to 2012-13.
| Location | Programme
name | 2009-10 | 2010-11 | 2011-12 | 2012-13 | Grand
total |
| Albany | Core
Programme | 36 | 54 | 63 | 36 | 189 |
| Extended
Programme | 27 | 27 | 27 | 18 | 99 | |
| Albany
Total | 63 | 81 | 90 | 54 | 288 | |
| Aylesbury | Becoming
New
Me | — | — | — | 5 | 5 |
| Core
Programme | 17 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 71 | |
| Aylesbury
Total | 17 | 18 | 18 | 23 | 76 | |
| Brixton | Core
Programme | — | — | — | 17 | 17 |
| Healthy
Sexual
Functioning | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | |
| Rolling
Programme | — | — | 4 | 15 | 19 | |
| Brixton
Total | — | — | 4 | 34 | 38 | |
| Bullingdon | Becoming
New
Me | — | — | — | 5 | 5 |
| Better
Lives
Booster | 9 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 45 | |
| Core
Programme | 27 | 27 | 27 | 18 | 99 | |
| Rolling
Programme | 33 | 36 | 32 | 29 | 130 | |
| Bullingdon
Total | 69 | 81 | 68 | 61 | 279 | |
| Bure | Better
Lives
Booster | — | 27 | 9 | 27 | 63 |
| Core
Programme | — | 45 | 27 | 27 | 99 | |
| Extended
Programme | — | — | 18 | 9 | 27 | |
| Healthy
Sexual
Functioning | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | |
| Bure
Total | — | 72 | 54 | 65 | 191 | |
| Channings
Wood | Better
Lives
Booster | 18 | 26 | 18 | 27 | 89 |
| Core
Programme | 9 | 9 | 18 | 9 | 45 | |
| Healthy
Sexual
Functioning | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | |
| Channings
Wood
Total | 27 | 35 | 36 | 40 | 138 | |
| Frankland | Adapted
Better Lives
Booster | — | 8 | 7 | — | 15 |
| Becoming
New
Me | 8 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 36 | |
| Core
Programme | 18 | 27 | 18 | 27 | 90 | |
| Extended
Programme | — | — | 10 | 9 | 19 | |
| Healthy
Sexual
Functioning | 2 | 4 | — | 2 | 8 | |
| Frankland
Total | 28 | 47 | 45 | 48 | 168 | |
| Full
Sutton | Core
Programme | 9 | 18 | 18 | 14 | 59 |
| Extended
Programme | 9 | 16 | 17 | 9 | 51 | |
| Healthy
Sexual
Functioning | 3 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 15 | |
| Rolling
Programme | 15 | — | — | 1 | 16 | |
| Full
Sutton
Total | 36 | 37 | 37 | 31 | 141 | |
| Hull | Becoming
New
Me | 16 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 40 |
| Core
Programme | 18 | 27 | 18 | 37 | 100 | |
| New
Me
Coping | — | — | 7 | — | 7 | |
| Rolling
Programme | 37 | 35 | 4 | 1 | 77 | |
| Hull
Total | 71 | 70 | 37 | 46 | 224 | |
| Littlehey | Core
Programme | 27 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 72 |
| Rolling
Programme | 35 | 37 | 39 | 37 | 148 | |
| Littlehey
Total | 62 | 46 | 57 | 55 | 220 | |
| Maidstone | Better
Lives
Booster | 16 | 26 | 34 | 17 | 93 |
| Core
Programme | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 72 | |
| Rolling
Programme | 17 | — | — | — | 17 | |
| Maidstone
Total | 51 | 44 | 52 | 35 | 182 | |
| Manchester | Becoming
New
Me | 8 | 8 | — | — | 16 |
| Core
Programme | 7 | 9 | 9 | — | 25 | |
| Manchester
Total | 15 | 17 | 9 | — | 41 | |
| Northumberland1 | Becoming
New
Me | — | 8 | 8 | — | 16 |
| Better
Lives
Booster | — | 15 | 15 | 7 | 37 | |
| Core
Programme | 9 | 18 | 9 | 27 | 63 | |
| Rolling
Programme | 21 | — | — | — | 21 | |
| Northumberland
Total | 30 | 41 | 32 | 34 | 137 | |
| Parc | Rolling
Programme | 32 | 32 | 31 | 27 | 122 |
| Parc
Total | 32 | 32 | 31 | 27 | 122 | |
| Risley | Core
Programme | 9 | 18 | 18 | 9 | 54 |
| Extended
Programme | 18 | 18 | 19 | 9 | 64 | |
| Healthy
Sexual
Functioning | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 26 | |
| Rolling
Programme | 28 | 23 | 22 | 28 | 101 | |
| Risley
Total | 63 | 64 | 67 | 51 | 245 | |
| Rye
Hill | Becoming
New
Me | 6 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 38 |
| Core
Programme | 43 | 18 | 18 | 27 | 106 | |
| Rye
Hill
Total | 49 | 34 | 26 | 35 | 144 | |
| Shepton
Mallet | Better
Lives
Booster | 27 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 71 |
| Core
Programme | — | 9 | — | 9 | 18 | |
| Extended
Programme | 9 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 45 | |
| Shepton
Mallet
Total | 36 | 36 | 27 | 35 | 134 | |
| Stafford | Core
Programme | 27 | 27 | 27 | 18 | 99 |
| Rolling
Programme | 33 | 36 | 35 | 11 | 115 | |
| Stafford
Total | 60 | 63 | 62 | 29 | 214 | |
| Swinfen
Hall | Adapted
Better Lives
Booster | — | — | 8 | 8 | 16 |
| Becoming
New
Me | 16 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 40 | |
| Better
Lives
Booster | — | 9 | 9 | 18 | 36 | |
| Core
Programme | 27 | 9 | 17 | 26 | 79 | |
| Extended
Programme | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 36 | |
| Swinfen
Hall
Total | 52 | 35 | 51 | 69 | 207 | |
| Usk | Adapted
Better Lives
Booster | — | 9 | 9 | — | 18 |
| Becoming
New
Me | 8 | — | 8 | 8 | 24 | |
| Better
Lives
Booster | — | 9 | 9 | 8 | 26 | |
| Core
Programme | 9 | 9 | 18 | 27 | 63 | |
| Extended
Programme | 18 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 45 | |
| Healthy
Sexual
Functioning | — | 2 | 4 | 3 | 9 | |
| Usk
Total | 35 | 38 | 57 | 55 | 185 | |
| Wakefield | Adapted
Better Lives Booster | 8 | — | — | — | 8 |
| Becoming
New
Me | — | 8 | — | — | 8 | |
| Better
Lives
Booster | — | 9 | — | 9 | 18 | |
| Core
Programme | 27 | 9 | 27 | 18 | 81 | |
| Extended
Programme | — | 18 | — | 9 | 27 | |
| Healthy
Sexual
Functioning | 2 | — | — | — | 2 | |
| Wakefield
Total | 37 | 44 | 27 | 36 | 144 | |
| Wandsworth | Core
Programme | 27 | 27 | 26 | — | 80 |
| Healthy
Sexual
Functioning | 1 | 2 | 2 | — | 5 | |
| Rolling
Programme | 38 | 38 | 24 | — | 100 | |
| Wandsworth
Total | 66 | 67 | 52 | — | 185 | |
| Wayland | Better
Lives Booster | 9 | — | — | — | 9 |
| Core
Programme | 8 | — | — | — | 8 | |
| Rolling
Programme | 18 | — | — | — | 18 | |
| Wayland
Total | 35 | — | — | — | 35 | |
| Whatton | Adapted
Better Lives
Booster | 16 | 16 | 24 | 16 | 72 |
| Becoming
New
Me | 24 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 60 | |
| Better
Lives
Booster | 36 | 27 | 36 | 27 | 126 | |
| Core
Programme | 36 | 9 | 45 | 45 | 135 | |
| Extended
Programme | 9 | 18 | 27 | 27 | 81 | |
| Healthy
Sexual
Functioning | — | — | 5 | 10 | 15 | |
| Rolling
Programme | 55 | 58 | 35 | 35 | 183 | |
| Whatton
Total | 176 | 144 | 180 | 172 | 672 | |
| Wymott | Adapted
Programme | 8 | — | — | — | 8 |
| Becoming
New
Me | 8 | 8 | 16 | 8 | 40 | |
| Better
Lives
Booster | — | — | 9 | 7 | 16 | |
| Core
Programme | 27 | 35 | 18 | 27 | 107 | |
| Wymott
Total | 43 | 43 | 43 | 42 | 171 | |
| Grand
Total | 1,153 | 1,189 | 1,162 | 1,077 | 4,581 | |
| 1
Figures refer to Acklington prior to merger with Castington to
become Northumberland in
2011-12. |
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what the average waiting time for a sex offender treatment programme is (a) across the whole prison estate and (b) in those prisons holding sex offenders.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what the average waiting time for a sex offender treatment programme is (a) across the whole prison estate and (b) in those prisons holding sex offenders.
NOMS run a number of different sexual offending treatment programmes across various prison types and security categories. The range of courses and individual circumstances of the offenders waiting to undertake them means that it is not possible to provide a meaningful average waiting time for these programmes. Prisoners' access can be dependent upon a number of factors which include their level of motivation, risk of recidivism, treatment history or sentence plan, and their sentence length and release date or tariff expiry. Once referred for a programme, access will also depend on whether other prisoners are considered to take priority for that programme on factors such as level of risk and release date.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what the average cost of probation supervision of an individual with a sex offender programme attachment was in the latest year for which information is available.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what the average cost of probation supervision of an individual with a sex offender programme attachment was in the latest year for which information is available.
To ask the Minister of State, Ministry of Justice what plans she has to increase resources for the Sex Offender Treatment Programme at each prison where the number of prisoners exceeds the programme capacity; and if she will make a statement.
To ask the Minister of State, Ministry of Justice what plans she has to increase resources for the Sex Offender Treatment Programme at each prison where the number of prisoners exceeds the programme capacity; and if she will make a statement.
To ask the Minister of State, Ministry of Justice if she will make a statement on the effectiveness of the Sex Offender Treatment Programme (SOTP) for (a) high, (b) medium and (c) low risk offenders; and what the subsequent reconviction rates are for offenders from each of these categories who...
To ask the Minister of State, Ministry of Justice if she will make a statement on the effectiveness of the Sex Offender Treatment Programme (SOTP) for (a) high, (b) medium and (c) low risk offenders; and what the subsequent reconviction rates are for offenders from each of these categories who...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the re-offending rate was of sex offenders who (a) attended and (b) did not attend the sexual offender treatment programme in each of the last five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the re-offending rate was of sex offenders who (a) attended and (b) did not attend the sexual offender treatment programme in each of the last five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what proportion of sexual offenders in prison attended the sexual offender treatment programme in each of the last five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what proportion of sexual offenders in prison attended the sexual offender treatment programme in each of the last five years.
| SOTP completions¹ | Sex offender population at 30 June² | |
| 2001-02 | 867 | 5,107 |
| 2002-03 | 948 | 5,294 |
| 2003-04 | 1,157 | 5,540 |
| 2004-05 | 1,232 | 5,773 |
| 2005-06 | 1,152 | 6,185 |
| ¹ Figures includes both public and contracted sectors. | ||
| ² Immediate custodial sentenced population in prison establishments for sexual offences. |
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment he has made of the role of attachment theory in the (a) construction and (b) delivery of sex offender treatment programmes; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment he has made of the role of attachment theory in the (a) construction and (b) delivery of sex offender treatment programmes; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the average length of time taken to achieve parole was by those who (a) participated and (b) did not participate in the Sex Offender Treatment Programme in the last period for which figures are available.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the average length of time taken to achieve parole was by those who (a) participated and (b) did not participate in the Sex Offender Treatment Programme in the last period for which figures are available.